Cargando…
The Use of Social Media for Health Research Purposes: Scoping Review
BACKGROUND: As social media are increasingly used worldwide, more and more scientists are relying on them for their health-related projects. However, social media features, methodologies, and ethical issues are unclear so far because, to our knowledge, there has been no overview of this relatively y...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042593 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25736 |
_version_ | 1783706234068664320 |
---|---|
author | Bour, Charline Ahne, Adrian Schmitz, Susanne Perchoux, Camille Dessenne, Coralie Fagherazzi, Guy |
author_facet | Bour, Charline Ahne, Adrian Schmitz, Susanne Perchoux, Camille Dessenne, Coralie Fagherazzi, Guy |
author_sort | Bour, Charline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As social media are increasingly used worldwide, more and more scientists are relying on them for their health-related projects. However, social media features, methodologies, and ethical issues are unclear so far because, to our knowledge, there has been no overview of this relatively young field of research. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to provide an evidence map of the different uses of social media for health research purposes, their fields of application, and their analysis methods. METHODS: We followed the scoping review methodologies developed by Arksey and O’Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute. After developing search strategies based on keywords (eg, social media, health research), comprehensive searches were conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. We limited the search strategies to documents written in English and published between January 1, 2005, and April 9, 2020. After removing duplicates, articles were screened at the title and abstract level and at the full text level by two independent reviewers. One reviewer extracted data, which were descriptively analyzed to map the available evidence. RESULTS: After screening 1237 titles and abstracts and 407 full texts, 268 unique papers were included, dating from 2009 to 2020 with an average annual growth rate of 32.71% for the 2009-2019 period. Studies mainly came from the Americas (173/268, 64.6%, including 151 from the United States). Articles used machine learning or data mining techniques (60/268) to analyze the data, discussed opportunities and limitations of the use of social media for research (59/268), assessed the feasibility of recruitment strategies (45/268), or discussed ethical issues (16/268). Communicable (eg, influenza, 40/268) and then chronic (eg, cancer, 24/268) diseases were the two main areas of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Since their early days, social media have been recognized as resources with high potential for health research purposes, yet the field is still suffering from strong heterogeneity in the methodologies used, which prevents the research from being compared and generalized. For the field to be fully recognized as a valid, complementary approach to more traditional health research study designs, there is now a need for more guidance by types of applications of social media for health research, both from a methodological and an ethical perspective. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040671 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8193478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81934782021-06-28 The Use of Social Media for Health Research Purposes: Scoping Review Bour, Charline Ahne, Adrian Schmitz, Susanne Perchoux, Camille Dessenne, Coralie Fagherazzi, Guy J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: As social media are increasingly used worldwide, more and more scientists are relying on them for their health-related projects. However, social media features, methodologies, and ethical issues are unclear so far because, to our knowledge, there has been no overview of this relatively young field of research. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aimed to provide an evidence map of the different uses of social media for health research purposes, their fields of application, and their analysis methods. METHODS: We followed the scoping review methodologies developed by Arksey and O’Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute. After developing search strategies based on keywords (eg, social media, health research), comprehensive searches were conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. We limited the search strategies to documents written in English and published between January 1, 2005, and April 9, 2020. After removing duplicates, articles were screened at the title and abstract level and at the full text level by two independent reviewers. One reviewer extracted data, which were descriptively analyzed to map the available evidence. RESULTS: After screening 1237 titles and abstracts and 407 full texts, 268 unique papers were included, dating from 2009 to 2020 with an average annual growth rate of 32.71% for the 2009-2019 period. Studies mainly came from the Americas (173/268, 64.6%, including 151 from the United States). Articles used machine learning or data mining techniques (60/268) to analyze the data, discussed opportunities and limitations of the use of social media for research (59/268), assessed the feasibility of recruitment strategies (45/268), or discussed ethical issues (16/268). Communicable (eg, influenza, 40/268) and then chronic (eg, cancer, 24/268) diseases were the two main areas of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Since their early days, social media have been recognized as resources with high potential for health research purposes, yet the field is still suffering from strong heterogeneity in the methodologies used, which prevents the research from being compared and generalized. For the field to be fully recognized as a valid, complementary approach to more traditional health research study designs, there is now a need for more guidance by types of applications of social media for health research, both from a methodological and an ethical perspective. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040671 JMIR Publications 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8193478/ /pubmed/34042593 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25736 Text en ©Charline Bour, Adrian Ahne, Susanne Schmitz, Camille Perchoux, Coralie Dessenne, Guy Fagherazzi. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 27.05.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Bour, Charline Ahne, Adrian Schmitz, Susanne Perchoux, Camille Dessenne, Coralie Fagherazzi, Guy The Use of Social Media for Health Research Purposes: Scoping Review |
title | The Use of Social Media for Health Research Purposes: Scoping Review |
title_full | The Use of Social Media for Health Research Purposes: Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | The Use of Social Media for Health Research Purposes: Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Social Media for Health Research Purposes: Scoping Review |
title_short | The Use of Social Media for Health Research Purposes: Scoping Review |
title_sort | use of social media for health research purposes: scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042593 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bourcharline theuseofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT ahneadrian theuseofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT schmitzsusanne theuseofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT perchouxcamille theuseofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT dessennecoralie theuseofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT fagherazziguy theuseofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT bourcharline useofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT ahneadrian useofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT schmitzsusanne useofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT perchouxcamille useofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT dessennecoralie useofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview AT fagherazziguy useofsocialmediaforhealthresearchpurposesscopingreview |