Cargando…

A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal

Down syndrome (DS, Trisomy 21) and Williams syndrome (WS) are two neurodevelopmental disorders of genetic origin that are accompanied by mild to moderate intellectual disability but exhibit distinct cognitive profiles. In this review we discuss our recent work characterizing the real-world spatial l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Banta Lavenex, Pamela, Lavenex, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.669320
_version_ 1783706287984345088
author Banta Lavenex, Pamela
Lavenex, Pierre
author_facet Banta Lavenex, Pamela
Lavenex, Pierre
author_sort Banta Lavenex, Pamela
collection PubMed
description Down syndrome (DS, Trisomy 21) and Williams syndrome (WS) are two neurodevelopmental disorders of genetic origin that are accompanied by mild to moderate intellectual disability but exhibit distinct cognitive profiles. In this review we discuss our recent work characterizing the real-world spatial learning and memory abilities of adult individuals with DS and WS. We used several different paradigms in which participants locomote freely and have access to coherent input from all sensory modalities to investigate their fundamental egocentric (body-centered or viewpoint-dependent) and allocentric (world-centered or viewpoint-independent) spatial abilities. We found unequivocal evidence that most individuals with DS exhibit low-resolution egocentric and allocentric spatial learning and memory abilities similar to typically developing (TD) children in the same mental age range. In contrast, most individuals with DS exhibit impaired high-resolution allocentric spatial learning and facilitated response learning as compared to TD children. In comparison, whereas most individuals with WS also exhibit facilitated response learning, their low-resolution allocentric spatial learning and memory abilities are severely impaired as compared to both TD children and individuals with DS. Together with work from other laboratories using real-world or virtual reality paradigms, these findings indicate that in order to navigate in their environment most individuals with DS may use either egocentric route learning that does not integrate individual landmarks, or a low-resolution allocentric spatial representation that encodes the relationships between different locations (i.e., cognitive mapping). In contrast, since most individuals with WS are unable to build or use a low-resolution allocentric or configural representation of the environment they may use visually and verbally encoded landmarks as beacons to learn routes. Finally, we discuss the main neural structures implicated in these different spatial processes and explain how the relative preservation or impairment of specific brain functions may engender the unique cognitive profiles observed in individuals with these neurodevelopmental disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8193736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81937362021-06-12 A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal Banta Lavenex, Pamela Lavenex, Pierre Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Down syndrome (DS, Trisomy 21) and Williams syndrome (WS) are two neurodevelopmental disorders of genetic origin that are accompanied by mild to moderate intellectual disability but exhibit distinct cognitive profiles. In this review we discuss our recent work characterizing the real-world spatial learning and memory abilities of adult individuals with DS and WS. We used several different paradigms in which participants locomote freely and have access to coherent input from all sensory modalities to investigate their fundamental egocentric (body-centered or viewpoint-dependent) and allocentric (world-centered or viewpoint-independent) spatial abilities. We found unequivocal evidence that most individuals with DS exhibit low-resolution egocentric and allocentric spatial learning and memory abilities similar to typically developing (TD) children in the same mental age range. In contrast, most individuals with DS exhibit impaired high-resolution allocentric spatial learning and facilitated response learning as compared to TD children. In comparison, whereas most individuals with WS also exhibit facilitated response learning, their low-resolution allocentric spatial learning and memory abilities are severely impaired as compared to both TD children and individuals with DS. Together with work from other laboratories using real-world or virtual reality paradigms, these findings indicate that in order to navigate in their environment most individuals with DS may use either egocentric route learning that does not integrate individual landmarks, or a low-resolution allocentric spatial representation that encodes the relationships between different locations (i.e., cognitive mapping). In contrast, since most individuals with WS are unable to build or use a low-resolution allocentric or configural representation of the environment they may use visually and verbally encoded landmarks as beacons to learn routes. Finally, we discuss the main neural structures implicated in these different spatial processes and explain how the relative preservation or impairment of specific brain functions may engender the unique cognitive profiles observed in individuals with these neurodevelopmental disorders. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8193736/ /pubmed/34122185 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.669320 Text en Copyright © 2021 Banta Lavenex and Lavenex. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Banta Lavenex, Pamela
Lavenex, Pierre
A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal
title A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal
title_full A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal
title_fullStr A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal
title_full_unstemmed A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal
title_short A Critical Review of Spatial Abilities in Down and Williams Syndromes: Not All Space Is Created Equal
title_sort critical review of spatial abilities in down and williams syndromes: not all space is created equal
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34122185
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.669320
work_keys_str_mv AT bantalavenexpamela acriticalreviewofspatialabilitiesindownandwilliamssyndromesnotallspaceiscreatedequal
AT lavenexpierre acriticalreviewofspatialabilitiesindownandwilliamssyndromesnotallspaceiscreatedequal
AT bantalavenexpamela criticalreviewofspatialabilitiesindownandwilliamssyndromesnotallspaceiscreatedequal
AT lavenexpierre criticalreviewofspatialabilitiesindownandwilliamssyndromesnotallspaceiscreatedequal