Cargando…
Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols
INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is an essential step in the management of lung nodules (LNs). Low-dose CT (LDCT)-guided CNB has been used to decrease the radiation exposure. AIM: To evaluate the technical success, safety, diagnostic capacity, and radiation expo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136031 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.103303 |
_version_ | 1783706289848713216 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yi-Yang Cheng, Hong Li, Guang-Chao |
author_facet | Huang, Yi-Yang Cheng, Hong Li, Guang-Chao |
author_sort | Huang, Yi-Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is an essential step in the management of lung nodules (LNs). Low-dose CT (LDCT)-guided CNB has been used to decrease the radiation exposure. AIM: To evaluate the technical success, safety, diagnostic capacity, and radiation exposure to patients between LDCT-guided and standard-dose CT (SDCT)-guided CNB for LNs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-centre study. Patients who underwent LDCT-guided or SDCT-guided CNB for LNs from January 2015 to December 2017 were included. Data on technical success, diagnostic performance, complications, and radiation exposure were collected and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 70 and 65 patients underwent LDCT-guided and SDCT-guided CNB procedure, respectively. The technical success rates were 100% in both groups. The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy in the LDCT and SDCT groups were 71.4% and 67.7% (p = 0.637), 97.8% and 93.2% (p = 0.625), 100%, and 100%, and 98.6% and 95.4% (p = 0.560), respectively. The independent risk factor of diagnostic failure was less sample tissues (p = 0.012; 95% confidence interval: 0.033–0.651). Pneumothorax was found in 9 and 12 patients in the LDCT and SDCT groups, respectively (p = 0.369). Lung haemorrhage was found in 11 and 12 patients in the LDCT and SDCT groups, respectively (p = 0.671). The mean dose-length product was 38.3 ±17.0 mGy · cm and 376.0 ±118.7 mGy · cm in the LDCT and SDCT groups, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SDCT, LDCT-guided CNB can provide comparable safety and diagnostic performance for LNs while reducing exposure to radiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8193745 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81937452021-06-15 Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols Huang, Yi-Yang Cheng, Hong Li, Guang-Chao Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is an essential step in the management of lung nodules (LNs). Low-dose CT (LDCT)-guided CNB has been used to decrease the radiation exposure. AIM: To evaluate the technical success, safety, diagnostic capacity, and radiation exposure to patients between LDCT-guided and standard-dose CT (SDCT)-guided CNB for LNs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-centre study. Patients who underwent LDCT-guided or SDCT-guided CNB for LNs from January 2015 to December 2017 were included. Data on technical success, diagnostic performance, complications, and radiation exposure were collected and analysed. RESULTS: A total of 70 and 65 patients underwent LDCT-guided and SDCT-guided CNB procedure, respectively. The technical success rates were 100% in both groups. The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy in the LDCT and SDCT groups were 71.4% and 67.7% (p = 0.637), 97.8% and 93.2% (p = 0.625), 100%, and 100%, and 98.6% and 95.4% (p = 0.560), respectively. The independent risk factor of diagnostic failure was less sample tissues (p = 0.012; 95% confidence interval: 0.033–0.651). Pneumothorax was found in 9 and 12 patients in the LDCT and SDCT groups, respectively (p = 0.369). Lung haemorrhage was found in 11 and 12 patients in the LDCT and SDCT groups, respectively (p = 0.671). The mean dose-length product was 38.3 ±17.0 mGy · cm and 376.0 ±118.7 mGy · cm in the LDCT and SDCT groups, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SDCT, LDCT-guided CNB can provide comparable safety and diagnostic performance for LNs while reducing exposure to radiation. Termedia Publishing House 2021-02-03 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8193745/ /pubmed/34136031 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.103303 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Fundacja Videochirurgii https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Huang, Yi-Yang Cheng, Hong Li, Guang-Chao Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols |
title | Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols |
title_full | Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols |
title_fullStr | Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols |
title_short | Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols |
title_sort | computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy for lung nodules: low-dose versus standard-dose protocols |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8193745/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136031 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.103303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyiyang computedtomographyguidedcoreneedlebiopsyforlungnoduleslowdoseversusstandarddoseprotocols AT chenghong computedtomographyguidedcoreneedlebiopsyforlungnoduleslowdoseversusstandarddoseprotocols AT liguangchao computedtomographyguidedcoreneedlebiopsyforlungnoduleslowdoseversusstandarddoseprotocols |