Cargando…

Who would benefit from open abdomen in severe acute pancreatitis?—a matched case-control study

BACKGROUND: Selection of patients for open abdomen (OA) treatment in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is challenging. Treatment related morbidity and risk of adverse events are high; however, refractory abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is potentially lethal. Factors influencing the decision to in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Husu, Henrik Leonard, Leppäniemi, Ari Kalevi, Mentula, Panu Juhani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8194042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00376-x
_version_ 1783706342143295488
author Husu, Henrik Leonard
Leppäniemi, Ari Kalevi
Mentula, Panu Juhani
author_facet Husu, Henrik Leonard
Leppäniemi, Ari Kalevi
Mentula, Panu Juhani
author_sort Husu, Henrik Leonard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Selection of patients for open abdomen (OA) treatment in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is challenging. Treatment related morbidity and risk of adverse events are high; however, refractory abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is potentially lethal. Factors influencing the decision to initiate OA treatment are clinically important. We aimed to study these factors to help understand what influences the selection of patients for OA treatment in SAP. METHODS: A single center study of patients with SAP that underwent OA treatment compared with conservatively treated matched controls. RESULTS: Within study period, 47 patients treated with OA were matched in a 1:1 fashion with conservatively treated control patients. Urinary output under 20 ml/h (OR 5.0 95% CI 1.8-13.7) and ACS (OR 4.6 95% CI 1.4-15.2) independently associated with OA treatment. Patients with OA treatment had significantly more often visceral ischemia (34%) than controls (6%), P = 0.002. Mortality among patients with visceral ischemia was 63%. Clinically meaningful parameters predicting developing ischemia were not found. OA treatment associated with higher overall 90-day mortality rate (43% vs 17%, P = 0.012) and increased need for necrosectomy (55% vs 21%, P = 0.001). Delayed primary fascial closure was achieved in 33 (97%) patients that survived past OA treatment. CONCLUSION: Decreased urine output and ACS were independently associated with the choice of OA treatment in patients with SAP. Underlying visceral ischemia was strikingly common in patients undergoing OA treatment, but predicting ischemia in these patients seems difficult. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-021-00376-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8194042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81940422021-06-15 Who would benefit from open abdomen in severe acute pancreatitis?—a matched case-control study Husu, Henrik Leonard Leppäniemi, Ari Kalevi Mentula, Panu Juhani World J Emerg Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Selection of patients for open abdomen (OA) treatment in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is challenging. Treatment related morbidity and risk of adverse events are high; however, refractory abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is potentially lethal. Factors influencing the decision to initiate OA treatment are clinically important. We aimed to study these factors to help understand what influences the selection of patients for OA treatment in SAP. METHODS: A single center study of patients with SAP that underwent OA treatment compared with conservatively treated matched controls. RESULTS: Within study period, 47 patients treated with OA were matched in a 1:1 fashion with conservatively treated control patients. Urinary output under 20 ml/h (OR 5.0 95% CI 1.8-13.7) and ACS (OR 4.6 95% CI 1.4-15.2) independently associated with OA treatment. Patients with OA treatment had significantly more often visceral ischemia (34%) than controls (6%), P = 0.002. Mortality among patients with visceral ischemia was 63%. Clinically meaningful parameters predicting developing ischemia were not found. OA treatment associated with higher overall 90-day mortality rate (43% vs 17%, P = 0.012) and increased need for necrosectomy (55% vs 21%, P = 0.001). Delayed primary fascial closure was achieved in 33 (97%) patients that survived past OA treatment. CONCLUSION: Decreased urine output and ACS were independently associated with the choice of OA treatment in patients with SAP. Underlying visceral ischemia was strikingly common in patients undergoing OA treatment, but predicting ischemia in these patients seems difficult. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-021-00376-x. BioMed Central 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8194042/ /pubmed/34112205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00376-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Husu, Henrik Leonard
Leppäniemi, Ari Kalevi
Mentula, Panu Juhani
Who would benefit from open abdomen in severe acute pancreatitis?—a matched case-control study
title Who would benefit from open abdomen in severe acute pancreatitis?—a matched case-control study
title_full Who would benefit from open abdomen in severe acute pancreatitis?—a matched case-control study
title_fullStr Who would benefit from open abdomen in severe acute pancreatitis?—a matched case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Who would benefit from open abdomen in severe acute pancreatitis?—a matched case-control study
title_short Who would benefit from open abdomen in severe acute pancreatitis?—a matched case-control study
title_sort who would benefit from open abdomen in severe acute pancreatitis?—a matched case-control study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8194042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34112205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00376-x
work_keys_str_mv AT husuhenrikleonard whowouldbenefitfromopenabdomeninsevereacutepancreatitisamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT leppaniemiarikalevi whowouldbenefitfromopenabdomeninsevereacutepancreatitisamatchedcasecontrolstudy
AT mentulapanujuhani whowouldbenefitfromopenabdomeninsevereacutepancreatitisamatchedcasecontrolstudy