Cargando…

Mechanical, sensory, and consumer evaluation of ketogenic, gluten‐free breads

Ketogenic, gluten‐free breads comprised of almond flour, oat bran fiber, or combinations of both were compared. The textural properties, sensory attributes, and consumer acceptance were analyzed on each bread containing 100% almond flour (AF), 66.7% almond flour with 33.3% oat bran fiber (AOB), 66.7...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillespie, Rachel, Ahlborn, Gene J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8194744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2308
_version_ 1783706437305761792
author Gillespie, Rachel
Ahlborn, Gene J.
author_facet Gillespie, Rachel
Ahlborn, Gene J.
author_sort Gillespie, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Ketogenic, gluten‐free breads comprised of almond flour, oat bran fiber, or combinations of both were compared. The textural properties, sensory attributes, and consumer acceptance were analyzed on each bread containing 100% almond flour (AF), 66.7% almond flour with 33.3% oat bran fiber (AOB), 66.7% oat bran fiber with 33.3% almond flour (OBA), and 100% oat bran fiber (OB). AF and AOB breads had a more open crumb structure composed of cells between 1–4 mm(2). OBA and OB had a significantly dense crumb pattern made up of more cells less than one millimeter squared. Quantitative–descriptive analysis (QDA) and consumer acceptance testing was conducted 24 hr after baking and mechanical endpoints were evaluated 24, 72, and 120 hr after baking. AF and AOB breads were preferred over OBA and OB breads in QDA evaluation and consumer acceptance scores. Greater percentages of oat bran fiber resulted in a bread that was less moist, firmer in texture, and chewier with trained panelists. In both sensory evaluations, higher amounts of almond flour resulted in higher values in eggy flavor while increased amounts of oat bran fiber correlated with higher values in earthy flavor. Mechanical testing identified higher percentages of almond flour resulted in bread that was less firm and less chewy. Over time, all variations with almond flour became softer and less chewy, while the OB bread increased in firmness. Sensory cohesiveness did not correlate with the mechanical equivalent, identifying a need to re‐evaluate the parameters used to calculate this objective endpoint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8194744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81947442021-06-15 Mechanical, sensory, and consumer evaluation of ketogenic, gluten‐free breads Gillespie, Rachel Ahlborn, Gene J. Food Sci Nutr Original Research Ketogenic, gluten‐free breads comprised of almond flour, oat bran fiber, or combinations of both were compared. The textural properties, sensory attributes, and consumer acceptance were analyzed on each bread containing 100% almond flour (AF), 66.7% almond flour with 33.3% oat bran fiber (AOB), 66.7% oat bran fiber with 33.3% almond flour (OBA), and 100% oat bran fiber (OB). AF and AOB breads had a more open crumb structure composed of cells between 1–4 mm(2). OBA and OB had a significantly dense crumb pattern made up of more cells less than one millimeter squared. Quantitative–descriptive analysis (QDA) and consumer acceptance testing was conducted 24 hr after baking and mechanical endpoints were evaluated 24, 72, and 120 hr after baking. AF and AOB breads were preferred over OBA and OB breads in QDA evaluation and consumer acceptance scores. Greater percentages of oat bran fiber resulted in a bread that was less moist, firmer in texture, and chewier with trained panelists. In both sensory evaluations, higher amounts of almond flour resulted in higher values in eggy flavor while increased amounts of oat bran fiber correlated with higher values in earthy flavor. Mechanical testing identified higher percentages of almond flour resulted in bread that was less firm and less chewy. Over time, all variations with almond flour became softer and less chewy, while the OB bread increased in firmness. Sensory cohesiveness did not correlate with the mechanical equivalent, identifying a need to re‐evaluate the parameters used to calculate this objective endpoint. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8194744/ /pubmed/34136197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2308 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gillespie, Rachel
Ahlborn, Gene J.
Mechanical, sensory, and consumer evaluation of ketogenic, gluten‐free breads
title Mechanical, sensory, and consumer evaluation of ketogenic, gluten‐free breads
title_full Mechanical, sensory, and consumer evaluation of ketogenic, gluten‐free breads
title_fullStr Mechanical, sensory, and consumer evaluation of ketogenic, gluten‐free breads
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical, sensory, and consumer evaluation of ketogenic, gluten‐free breads
title_short Mechanical, sensory, and consumer evaluation of ketogenic, gluten‐free breads
title_sort mechanical, sensory, and consumer evaluation of ketogenic, gluten‐free breads
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8194744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2308
work_keys_str_mv AT gillespierachel mechanicalsensoryandconsumerevaluationofketogenicglutenfreebreads
AT ahlborngenej mechanicalsensoryandconsumerevaluationofketogenicglutenfreebreads