Cargando…
Pooled Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients With Urological Malignancies in the Real-World Setting
Lipegfilgrastim is a long-acting glycopegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) approved for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. In general, there is little information on the use of any G-CSFs specifically in patients with urological malignancies receiving chemotherapy...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.655355 |
_version_ | 1783706470955614208 |
---|---|
author | Merseburger, Axel S. Geiges, Götz Klier, Jörg Wiesholzer, Martin Pichler, Petra |
author_facet | Merseburger, Axel S. Geiges, Götz Klier, Jörg Wiesholzer, Martin Pichler, Petra |
author_sort | Merseburger, Axel S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lipegfilgrastim is a long-acting glycopegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) approved for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. In general, there is little information on the use of any G-CSFs specifically in patients with urological malignancies receiving chemotherapy. This report combines information from two prospective non-interventional studies on the prophylactic use of lipegfilgrastim in urological cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the real-world setting. Data were derived from two phase IV studies (NADIR and LEOS) with similar protocols conducted in nine European countries. Analysis included 228 patients (142 prostate, 50 testicular, 27 bladder, and 9 other urological cancers). Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia risk was classified as high (43.0%), intermediate (49.1%), or low (7.5%). Lipegfilgrastim was administered as primary (n=180, 78.9%) or secondary (n=29, 12.7%) prophylaxis. The incidence of febrile neutropenia over all chemotherapy cycles (n=998) and first cycles (n=228) for which lipegfilgrastim was administered for prophylaxis was 2.6% and 1.3%, respectively. Corresponding results for Grade 3/4 neutropenia were 2.2% and 0.9%, respectively. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 24 patients (10.5%): those in more than one patient were bone pain (n=6, 2.6%) and pyrexia (n=3, 1.3%). The use of lipegfilgrastim for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia was effective and well tolerated in patients with urological malignancies in the real-world setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8195268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81952682021-06-12 Pooled Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients With Urological Malignancies in the Real-World Setting Merseburger, Axel S. Geiges, Götz Klier, Jörg Wiesholzer, Martin Pichler, Petra Front Oncol Oncology Lipegfilgrastim is a long-acting glycopegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) approved for the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. In general, there is little information on the use of any G-CSFs specifically in patients with urological malignancies receiving chemotherapy. This report combines information from two prospective non-interventional studies on the prophylactic use of lipegfilgrastim in urological cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the real-world setting. Data were derived from two phase IV studies (NADIR and LEOS) with similar protocols conducted in nine European countries. Analysis included 228 patients (142 prostate, 50 testicular, 27 bladder, and 9 other urological cancers). Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia risk was classified as high (43.0%), intermediate (49.1%), or low (7.5%). Lipegfilgrastim was administered as primary (n=180, 78.9%) or secondary (n=29, 12.7%) prophylaxis. The incidence of febrile neutropenia over all chemotherapy cycles (n=998) and first cycles (n=228) for which lipegfilgrastim was administered for prophylaxis was 2.6% and 1.3%, respectively. Corresponding results for Grade 3/4 neutropenia were 2.2% and 0.9%, respectively. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 24 patients (10.5%): those in more than one patient were bone pain (n=6, 2.6%) and pyrexia (n=3, 1.3%). The use of lipegfilgrastim for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia was effective and well tolerated in patients with urological malignancies in the real-world setting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8195268/ /pubmed/34123810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.655355 Text en Copyright © 2021 Merseburger, Geiges, Klier, Wiesholzer and Pichler https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Merseburger, Axel S. Geiges, Götz Klier, Jörg Wiesholzer, Martin Pichler, Petra Pooled Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients With Urological Malignancies in the Real-World Setting |
title | Pooled Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients With Urological Malignancies in the Real-World Setting |
title_full | Pooled Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients With Urological Malignancies in the Real-World Setting |
title_fullStr | Pooled Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients With Urological Malignancies in the Real-World Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Pooled Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients With Urological Malignancies in the Real-World Setting |
title_short | Pooled Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients With Urological Malignancies in the Real-World Setting |
title_sort | pooled analysis on the effectiveness and safety of lipegfilgrastim in patients with urological malignancies in the real-world setting |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.655355 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merseburgeraxels pooledanalysisontheeffectivenessandsafetyoflipegfilgrastiminpatientswithurologicalmalignanciesintherealworldsetting AT geigesgotz pooledanalysisontheeffectivenessandsafetyoflipegfilgrastiminpatientswithurologicalmalignanciesintherealworldsetting AT klierjorg pooledanalysisontheeffectivenessandsafetyoflipegfilgrastiminpatientswithurologicalmalignanciesintherealworldsetting AT wiesholzermartin pooledanalysisontheeffectivenessandsafetyoflipegfilgrastiminpatientswithurologicalmalignanciesintherealworldsetting AT pichlerpetra pooledanalysisontheeffectivenessandsafetyoflipegfilgrastiminpatientswithurologicalmalignanciesintherealworldsetting |