Cargando…

Radiomic Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Different Image Types: Classification of Breast Lesions

Objective: A limited number of studies have focused on the radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). We aimed to construct several radiomics-based models of CEM for classifying benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: The retrospective, double-center study included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Simin, Mao, Ning, Duan, Shaofeng, Li, Qin, Li, Ruimin, Jiang, Tingting, Wang, Zhongyi, Xie, Haizhu, Gu, Yajia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.600546
_version_ 1783706471451590656
author Wang, Simin
Mao, Ning
Duan, Shaofeng
Li, Qin
Li, Ruimin
Jiang, Tingting
Wang, Zhongyi
Xie, Haizhu
Gu, Yajia
author_facet Wang, Simin
Mao, Ning
Duan, Shaofeng
Li, Qin
Li, Ruimin
Jiang, Tingting
Wang, Zhongyi
Xie, Haizhu
Gu, Yajia
author_sort Wang, Simin
collection PubMed
description Objective: A limited number of studies have focused on the radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). We aimed to construct several radiomics-based models of CEM for classifying benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: The retrospective, double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2013 and February 2020. Radiomic analysis was performed using high-energy (HE), low-energy (LE), and dual-energy subtraction (DES) images from CEM. Datasets were randomly divided into the training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. The maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) method and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression were used to select the radiomic features and construct the best classification models. The performances of the models were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Leave-group-out cross-validation (LGOCV) for 100 rounds was performed to obtain the mean AUCs, which were compared by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test. Results: A total of 192 women with 226 breast lesions (101 benign; 125 malignant) were enrolled. The median age was 48 years (range, 22–70 years). For the classification of breast lesions, the AUCs of the best models were 0.931 (95% CI: 0.873–0.989) for HE, 0.897 (95% CI: 0.807–0.981) for LE, 0.882 (95% CI: 0.825–0.987) for DES images and 0.960 (95% CI: 0.910–0.998) for all of the CEM images in the testing set. According to LGOCV, the models constructed with the HE images and all of the CEM images showed the highest mean AUCs for the training (0.931 and 0.938, respectively; P < 0.05 for both) and testing sets (0.892 and 0.889, respectively; P = 0.55 for both), which were significantly higher than those of the two models constructed with the LE and DES images in the training (0.912 and 0.899, respectively; all P < 0.05) and testing sets (0.866 and 0.862, respectively; all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Radiomic analysis of CEM images was valuable for classifying benign and malignant breast lesions. The use of HE images or all three types of CEM images can achieve the best performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8195270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81952702021-06-12 Radiomic Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Different Image Types: Classification of Breast Lesions Wang, Simin Mao, Ning Duan, Shaofeng Li, Qin Li, Ruimin Jiang, Tingting Wang, Zhongyi Xie, Haizhu Gu, Yajia Front Oncol Oncology Objective: A limited number of studies have focused on the radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). We aimed to construct several radiomics-based models of CEM for classifying benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: The retrospective, double-center study included women who underwent CEM between November 2013 and February 2020. Radiomic analysis was performed using high-energy (HE), low-energy (LE), and dual-energy subtraction (DES) images from CEM. Datasets were randomly divided into the training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. The maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) method and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression were used to select the radiomic features and construct the best classification models. The performances of the models were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Leave-group-out cross-validation (LGOCV) for 100 rounds was performed to obtain the mean AUCs, which were compared by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test. Results: A total of 192 women with 226 breast lesions (101 benign; 125 malignant) were enrolled. The median age was 48 years (range, 22–70 years). For the classification of breast lesions, the AUCs of the best models were 0.931 (95% CI: 0.873–0.989) for HE, 0.897 (95% CI: 0.807–0.981) for LE, 0.882 (95% CI: 0.825–0.987) for DES images and 0.960 (95% CI: 0.910–0.998) for all of the CEM images in the testing set. According to LGOCV, the models constructed with the HE images and all of the CEM images showed the highest mean AUCs for the training (0.931 and 0.938, respectively; P < 0.05 for both) and testing sets (0.892 and 0.889, respectively; P = 0.55 for both), which were significantly higher than those of the two models constructed with the LE and DES images in the training (0.912 and 0.899, respectively; all P < 0.05) and testing sets (0.866 and 0.862, respectively; all P < 0.05). Conclusions: Radiomic analysis of CEM images was valuable for classifying benign and malignant breast lesions. The use of HE images or all three types of CEM images can achieve the best performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8195270/ /pubmed/34123776 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.600546 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Mao, Duan, Li, Li, Jiang, Wang, Xie and Gu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Simin
Mao, Ning
Duan, Shaofeng
Li, Qin
Li, Ruimin
Jiang, Tingting
Wang, Zhongyi
Xie, Haizhu
Gu, Yajia
Radiomic Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Different Image Types: Classification of Breast Lesions
title Radiomic Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Different Image Types: Classification of Breast Lesions
title_full Radiomic Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Different Image Types: Classification of Breast Lesions
title_fullStr Radiomic Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Different Image Types: Classification of Breast Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Radiomic Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Different Image Types: Classification of Breast Lesions
title_short Radiomic Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography With Different Image Types: Classification of Breast Lesions
title_sort radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography with different image types: classification of breast lesions
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123776
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.600546
work_keys_str_mv AT wangsimin radiomicanalysisofcontrastenhancedmammographywithdifferentimagetypesclassificationofbreastlesions
AT maoning radiomicanalysisofcontrastenhancedmammographywithdifferentimagetypesclassificationofbreastlesions
AT duanshaofeng radiomicanalysisofcontrastenhancedmammographywithdifferentimagetypesclassificationofbreastlesions
AT liqin radiomicanalysisofcontrastenhancedmammographywithdifferentimagetypesclassificationofbreastlesions
AT liruimin radiomicanalysisofcontrastenhancedmammographywithdifferentimagetypesclassificationofbreastlesions
AT jiangtingting radiomicanalysisofcontrastenhancedmammographywithdifferentimagetypesclassificationofbreastlesions
AT wangzhongyi radiomicanalysisofcontrastenhancedmammographywithdifferentimagetypesclassificationofbreastlesions
AT xiehaizhu radiomicanalysisofcontrastenhancedmammographywithdifferentimagetypesclassificationofbreastlesions
AT guyajia radiomicanalysisofcontrastenhancedmammographywithdifferentimagetypesclassificationofbreastlesions