Cargando…

The impact of slow stomatal kinetics on photosynthesis and water use efficiency under fluctuating light

Dynamic light conditions require continuous adjustments of stomatal aperture. The kinetics of stomatal conductance (g(s)) is hypothesized to be key to plant productivity and water use efficiency (WUE). Using step-changes in light intensity, we studied the diversity of light-induced g(s) kinetics in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eyland, David, van Wesemael, Jelle, Lawson, Tracy, Carpentier, Sebastien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33693867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab114
Descripción
Sumario:Dynamic light conditions require continuous adjustments of stomatal aperture. The kinetics of stomatal conductance (g(s)) is hypothesized to be key to plant productivity and water use efficiency (WUE). Using step-changes in light intensity, we studied the diversity of light-induced g(s) kinetics in relation to stomatal anatomy in five banana genotypes (Musa spp.) and modeled the impact of both diffusional and biochemical limitations on photosynthesis (A). The dominant A limiting factor was the diffusional limitation associated with g(s) kinetics. All genotypes exhibited a strong limitation of A by g(s), indicating a priority for water saving. Moreover, significant genotypic differences in g(s) kinetics and g(s) limitations of A were observed. For two contrasting genotypes, the impact of differential g(s) kinetics was further investigated under realistic diurnally fluctuating light conditions and at the whole-plant level. Genotype-specific stomatal kinetics observed at the leaf level was corroborated at whole-plant level by transpiration dynamics, validating that genotype-specific responses are still maintained despite differences in g(s) control at different locations in the leaf and across leaves. However, under diurnally fluctuating light conditions the impact of g(s) speediness on A and intrinsic ((i)WUE) depended on time of day. During the afternoon there was a setback in kinetics: absolute g(s) and g(s) responses to light were damped, strongly limiting A and impacting diurnal (i)WUE. We conclude the impact of differential g(s) kinetics depended on target light intensity, magnitude of change, g(s) prior to the change in light intensity, and particularly time of day.