Cargando…

Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints

Artificial finger joint design has been developed through different stages through the past. PIP (proximal interphalangeal) and MCP (metacarpophalangeal) artificial finger joints have come to replace the amputation and arthrodesis options; although, these artificial joints are still facing challenge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alnaimat, F. A., Owida, H. A., Al Sharah, A., Alhaj, M., Hassan, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5534796
_version_ 1783706534158532608
author Alnaimat, F. A.
Owida, H. A.
Al Sharah, A.
Alhaj, M.
Hassan, Mohammad
author_facet Alnaimat, F. A.
Owida, H. A.
Al Sharah, A.
Alhaj, M.
Hassan, Mohammad
author_sort Alnaimat, F. A.
collection PubMed
description Artificial finger joint design has been developed through different stages through the past. PIP (proximal interphalangeal) and MCP (metacarpophalangeal) artificial finger joints have come to replace the amputation and arthrodesis options; although, these artificial joints are still facing challenges related to reactive tissues, reduced range of motion, and flexion and extension deficits. Swanson silicone artificial finger joints are still common due to the physician's preferability of silicone with the dorsal approach during operation. Nevertheless, other artificial finger joints such as the pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty have also drawn the interests of practitioners. Artificial finger joint has been classified under three major categories which are constrained, unconstrained, and linked design. There are also challenges such as concerns of infections and articular cartilage necrosis associated with attempted retention of vascularity. In addition, one of the main challenges facing the silicone artificial finger joints is the fracture occurring at the distal stem with the hinge. The aim of this paper is to review the different artificial finger joints in one paper as there are few old review papers about them. Further studies need to be done to develop the design and materials of the pyrocarbon and silicone implants to increase the range of motion associated with them and the fatigue life of the silicone implants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8195645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81956452021-06-28 Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints Alnaimat, F. A. Owida, H. A. Al Sharah, A. Alhaj, M. Hassan, Mohammad Appl Bionics Biomech Review Article Artificial finger joint design has been developed through different stages through the past. PIP (proximal interphalangeal) and MCP (metacarpophalangeal) artificial finger joints have come to replace the amputation and arthrodesis options; although, these artificial joints are still facing challenges related to reactive tissues, reduced range of motion, and flexion and extension deficits. Swanson silicone artificial finger joints are still common due to the physician's preferability of silicone with the dorsal approach during operation. Nevertheless, other artificial finger joints such as the pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty have also drawn the interests of practitioners. Artificial finger joint has been classified under three major categories which are constrained, unconstrained, and linked design. There are also challenges such as concerns of infections and articular cartilage necrosis associated with attempted retention of vascularity. In addition, one of the main challenges facing the silicone artificial finger joints is the fracture occurring at the distal stem with the hinge. The aim of this paper is to review the different artificial finger joints in one paper as there are few old review papers about them. Further studies need to be done to develop the design and materials of the pyrocarbon and silicone implants to increase the range of motion associated with them and the fatigue life of the silicone implants. Hindawi 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8195645/ /pubmed/34188692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5534796 Text en Copyright © 2021 F. A. Alnaimat et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Alnaimat, F. A.
Owida, H. A.
Al Sharah, A.
Alhaj, M.
Hassan, Mohammad
Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints
title Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints
title_full Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints
title_fullStr Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints
title_full_unstemmed Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints
title_short Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints
title_sort silicone and pyrocarbon artificial finger joints
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5534796
work_keys_str_mv AT alnaimatfa siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints
AT owidaha siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints
AT alsharaha siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints
AT alhajm siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints
AT hassanmohammad siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints