Cargando…
Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints
Artificial finger joint design has been developed through different stages through the past. PIP (proximal interphalangeal) and MCP (metacarpophalangeal) artificial finger joints have come to replace the amputation and arthrodesis options; although, these artificial joints are still facing challenge...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5534796 |
_version_ | 1783706534158532608 |
---|---|
author | Alnaimat, F. A. Owida, H. A. Al Sharah, A. Alhaj, M. Hassan, Mohammad |
author_facet | Alnaimat, F. A. Owida, H. A. Al Sharah, A. Alhaj, M. Hassan, Mohammad |
author_sort | Alnaimat, F. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Artificial finger joint design has been developed through different stages through the past. PIP (proximal interphalangeal) and MCP (metacarpophalangeal) artificial finger joints have come to replace the amputation and arthrodesis options; although, these artificial joints are still facing challenges related to reactive tissues, reduced range of motion, and flexion and extension deficits. Swanson silicone artificial finger joints are still common due to the physician's preferability of silicone with the dorsal approach during operation. Nevertheless, other artificial finger joints such as the pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty have also drawn the interests of practitioners. Artificial finger joint has been classified under three major categories which are constrained, unconstrained, and linked design. There are also challenges such as concerns of infections and articular cartilage necrosis associated with attempted retention of vascularity. In addition, one of the main challenges facing the silicone artificial finger joints is the fracture occurring at the distal stem with the hinge. The aim of this paper is to review the different artificial finger joints in one paper as there are few old review papers about them. Further studies need to be done to develop the design and materials of the pyrocarbon and silicone implants to increase the range of motion associated with them and the fatigue life of the silicone implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8195645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81956452021-06-28 Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints Alnaimat, F. A. Owida, H. A. Al Sharah, A. Alhaj, M. Hassan, Mohammad Appl Bionics Biomech Review Article Artificial finger joint design has been developed through different stages through the past. PIP (proximal interphalangeal) and MCP (metacarpophalangeal) artificial finger joints have come to replace the amputation and arthrodesis options; although, these artificial joints are still facing challenges related to reactive tissues, reduced range of motion, and flexion and extension deficits. Swanson silicone artificial finger joints are still common due to the physician's preferability of silicone with the dorsal approach during operation. Nevertheless, other artificial finger joints such as the pyrocarbon implant arthroplasty have also drawn the interests of practitioners. Artificial finger joint has been classified under three major categories which are constrained, unconstrained, and linked design. There are also challenges such as concerns of infections and articular cartilage necrosis associated with attempted retention of vascularity. In addition, one of the main challenges facing the silicone artificial finger joints is the fracture occurring at the distal stem with the hinge. The aim of this paper is to review the different artificial finger joints in one paper as there are few old review papers about them. Further studies need to be done to develop the design and materials of the pyrocarbon and silicone implants to increase the range of motion associated with them and the fatigue life of the silicone implants. Hindawi 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8195645/ /pubmed/34188692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5534796 Text en Copyright © 2021 F. A. Alnaimat et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Alnaimat, F. A. Owida, H. A. Al Sharah, A. Alhaj, M. Hassan, Mohammad Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints |
title | Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints |
title_full | Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints |
title_fullStr | Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints |
title_full_unstemmed | Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints |
title_short | Silicone and Pyrocarbon Artificial Finger Joints |
title_sort | silicone and pyrocarbon artificial finger joints |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34188692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5534796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alnaimatfa siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints AT owidaha siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints AT alsharaha siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints AT alhajm siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints AT hassanmohammad siliconeandpyrocarbonartificialfingerjoints |