Cargando…
Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial
PURPOSE: The prospective, multicenter SMART SF trial demonstrated the acute safety and effectiveness of the 56-hole porous tip irrigated contact force (CF) catheter for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation with a low primary adverse event rate (2.5%), leading to FDA approval...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00780-4 |
_version_ | 1783706562654633984 |
---|---|
author | Natale, Andrea Monir, George Patel, Anshul M. Fishel, Robert S. Marchlinski, Francis E. Delaughter, M. Craig Athill, Charles A. Melby, Daniel P. Gonzalez, Mario D. Hariharan, Ramesh Gidney, Brett Tan, Tiffany Chinitz, Larry A. |
author_facet | Natale, Andrea Monir, George Patel, Anshul M. Fishel, Robert S. Marchlinski, Francis E. Delaughter, M. Craig Athill, Charles A. Melby, Daniel P. Gonzalez, Mario D. Hariharan, Ramesh Gidney, Brett Tan, Tiffany Chinitz, Larry A. |
author_sort | Natale, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The prospective, multicenter SMART SF trial demonstrated the acute safety and effectiveness of the 56-hole porous tip irrigated contact force (CF) catheter for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation with a low primary adverse event rate (2.5%), leading to FDA approval of the catheter. Here, we are reporting the long-term effectiveness and safety results that have not yet been reported. METHODS: Ablations were performed using the 56-hole porous tip irrigated CF catheter guided by the 3D mapping system stability module. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, and/or atrial flutter), based on electrocardiographic data at 12 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence occurring 3 months post procedure, acute procedural failures such as lack of entrance block confirmation of all PVs, and undergoing repeat procedure for atrial fibrillation in the evaluation period (91 to 365 days post the initial ablation procedure) were considered to be effectiveness failures. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (age 64.8 ± 9.7 years; male 52.6%; Caucasian 96.2%) participated in the 12-month effectiveness evaluation. Mean follow-up time was 373.5 ± 45.4 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from 12-month atrial tachyarrhythmia was 74.9%. Two procedure-related pericardial effusion events were reported at 92 and 180 days post procedure. There were no pulmonary vein stenosis complications or deaths reported through the 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The SMART SF 12-month follow-up evaluation corroborates the early safety and effectiveness success previously reported for PAF ablation with STSF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8195769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81957692021-06-28 Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial Natale, Andrea Monir, George Patel, Anshul M. Fishel, Robert S. Marchlinski, Francis E. Delaughter, M. Craig Athill, Charles A. Melby, Daniel P. Gonzalez, Mario D. Hariharan, Ramesh Gidney, Brett Tan, Tiffany Chinitz, Larry A. J Interv Card Electrophysiol Article PURPOSE: The prospective, multicenter SMART SF trial demonstrated the acute safety and effectiveness of the 56-hole porous tip irrigated contact force (CF) catheter for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation with a low primary adverse event rate (2.5%), leading to FDA approval of the catheter. Here, we are reporting the long-term effectiveness and safety results that have not yet been reported. METHODS: Ablations were performed using the 56-hole porous tip irrigated CF catheter guided by the 3D mapping system stability module. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, and/or atrial flutter), based on electrocardiographic data at 12 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence occurring 3 months post procedure, acute procedural failures such as lack of entrance block confirmation of all PVs, and undergoing repeat procedure for atrial fibrillation in the evaluation period (91 to 365 days post the initial ablation procedure) were considered to be effectiveness failures. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (age 64.8 ± 9.7 years; male 52.6%; Caucasian 96.2%) participated in the 12-month effectiveness evaluation. Mean follow-up time was 373.5 ± 45.4 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from 12-month atrial tachyarrhythmia was 74.9%. Two procedure-related pericardial effusion events were reported at 92 and 180 days post procedure. There were no pulmonary vein stenosis complications or deaths reported through the 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The SMART SF 12-month follow-up evaluation corroborates the early safety and effectiveness success previously reported for PAF ablation with STSF. Springer US 2020-05-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8195769/ /pubmed/32462550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00780-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Natale, Andrea Monir, George Patel, Anshul M. Fishel, Robert S. Marchlinski, Francis E. Delaughter, M. Craig Athill, Charles A. Melby, Daniel P. Gonzalez, Mario D. Hariharan, Ramesh Gidney, Brett Tan, Tiffany Chinitz, Larry A. Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial |
title | Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial |
title_full | Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial |
title_fullStr | Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial |
title_short | Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial |
title_sort | long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the smart sf trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32462550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00780-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nataleandrea longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT monirgeorge longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT patelanshulm longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT fishelroberts longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT marchlinskifrancise longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT delaughtermcraig longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT athillcharlesa longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT melbydanielp longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT gonzalezmariod longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT hariharanramesh longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT gidneybrett longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT tantiffany longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial AT chinitzlarrya longtermsafetyandeffectivenessofparoxysmalatrialfibrillationablationusingaporoustipcontactforcesensingcatheterfromthesmartsftrial |