Cargando…

Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGG) comprise the most common primary adult brain cancers and universally recur. Combination of re-irradiation therapy (reRT) and bevacizumab (BVZ) therapy for recurrent HGG is common, but its reported efficacy is mixed. OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical outcomes after re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulinich, Daniel P., Sheppard, John P., Nguyen, Thien, Kondajji, Aditya M., Unterberger, Ansley, Duong, Courtney, Enomoto, Adam, Patel, Kunal, Yang, Isaac
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33796887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04794-3
_version_ 1783706578887639040
author Kulinich, Daniel P.
Sheppard, John P.
Nguyen, Thien
Kondajji, Aditya M.
Unterberger, Ansley
Duong, Courtney
Enomoto, Adam
Patel, Kunal
Yang, Isaac
author_facet Kulinich, Daniel P.
Sheppard, John P.
Nguyen, Thien
Kondajji, Aditya M.
Unterberger, Ansley
Duong, Courtney
Enomoto, Adam
Patel, Kunal
Yang, Isaac
author_sort Kulinich, Daniel P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGG) comprise the most common primary adult brain cancers and universally recur. Combination of re-irradiation therapy (reRT) and bevacizumab (BVZ) therapy for recurrent HGG is common, but its reported efficacy is mixed. OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical outcomes after reRT ± BVZ in recurrent HGG patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), hypofractionated radiosurgery (HFSRT), or fully fractionated radiotherapy (FFRT). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified studies reporting outcomes for patients with recurrent HGG treated via reRT ± BVZ. Cohorts were stratified by BVZ treatment status and re-irradiation modality (SRS, HFSRT, and FFRT). Outcome variables were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and radiation necrosis (RN). RESULTS: Data on 1399 patients was analyzed, with 954 patients receiving reRT alone and 445 patients receiving reRT + BVZ. All patients initially underwent standard-of-care therapy for their primary HGG. In a multivariate analysis that adjusted for median patient age, WHO grade, RT dosing, reRT fractionation regimen, time between primary and re-irradiation, and re-irradiation target volume, BVZ therapy was associated with significantly improved OS (2.51, 95% CI [0.11, 4.92] months, P = .041) but no significant improvement in PFS (1.40, 95% CI [− 0.36, 3.18] months, P = .099). Patients receiving BVZ also had significantly lower rates of RN (2.2% vs 6.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of reRT + BVZ may improve OS and reduce RN rates in recurrent HGG, but further controlled studies are needed to confirm these effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-04794-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8195900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81959002021-06-28 Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review Kulinich, Daniel P. Sheppard, John P. Nguyen, Thien Kondajji, Aditya M. Unterberger, Ansley Duong, Courtney Enomoto, Adam Patel, Kunal Yang, Isaac Acta Neurochir (Wien) Review Article - Brain Tumors BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGG) comprise the most common primary adult brain cancers and universally recur. Combination of re-irradiation therapy (reRT) and bevacizumab (BVZ) therapy for recurrent HGG is common, but its reported efficacy is mixed. OBJECTIVE: To assess clinical outcomes after reRT ± BVZ in recurrent HGG patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), hypofractionated radiosurgery (HFSRT), or fully fractionated radiotherapy (FFRT). METHODS: We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified studies reporting outcomes for patients with recurrent HGG treated via reRT ± BVZ. Cohorts were stratified by BVZ treatment status and re-irradiation modality (SRS, HFSRT, and FFRT). Outcome variables were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and radiation necrosis (RN). RESULTS: Data on 1399 patients was analyzed, with 954 patients receiving reRT alone and 445 patients receiving reRT + BVZ. All patients initially underwent standard-of-care therapy for their primary HGG. In a multivariate analysis that adjusted for median patient age, WHO grade, RT dosing, reRT fractionation regimen, time between primary and re-irradiation, and re-irradiation target volume, BVZ therapy was associated with significantly improved OS (2.51, 95% CI [0.11, 4.92] months, P = .041) but no significant improvement in PFS (1.40, 95% CI [− 0.36, 3.18] months, P = .099). Patients receiving BVZ also had significantly lower rates of RN (2.2% vs 6.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Combination of reRT + BVZ may improve OS and reduce RN rates in recurrent HGG, but further controlled studies are needed to confirm these effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-04794-3. Springer Vienna 2021-04-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8195900/ /pubmed/33796887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04794-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article - Brain Tumors
Kulinich, Daniel P.
Sheppard, John P.
Nguyen, Thien
Kondajji, Aditya M.
Unterberger, Ansley
Duong, Courtney
Enomoto, Adam
Patel, Kunal
Yang, Isaac
Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review
title Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review
title_full Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review
title_fullStr Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review
title_short Radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review
title_sort radiotherapy versus combination radiotherapy-bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a systematic review
topic Review Article - Brain Tumors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33796887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-04794-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kulinichdanielp radiotherapyversuscombinationradiotherapybevacizumabforthetreatmentofrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreview
AT sheppardjohnp radiotherapyversuscombinationradiotherapybevacizumabforthetreatmentofrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreview
AT nguyenthien radiotherapyversuscombinationradiotherapybevacizumabforthetreatmentofrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreview
AT kondajjiadityam radiotherapyversuscombinationradiotherapybevacizumabforthetreatmentofrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreview
AT unterbergeransley radiotherapyversuscombinationradiotherapybevacizumabforthetreatmentofrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreview
AT duongcourtney radiotherapyversuscombinationradiotherapybevacizumabforthetreatmentofrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreview
AT enomotoadam radiotherapyversuscombinationradiotherapybevacizumabforthetreatmentofrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreview
AT patelkunal radiotherapyversuscombinationradiotherapybevacizumabforthetreatmentofrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreview
AT yangisaac radiotherapyversuscombinationradiotherapybevacizumabforthetreatmentofrecurrenthighgradegliomaasystematicreview