Cargando…
Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels
INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) is a novel minimally invasive procedure that allows the resection of various lesions in the gastrointestinal tract including the colorectum. Real-world data outside of published studies are lim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32648038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5 |
_version_ | 1783706580312653824 |
---|---|
author | Krutzenbichler, Irmengard Dollhopf, Markus Diepolder, Helmut Eigler, Andreas Fuchs, Martin Herrmann, Simon Kleber, Gerhard Lewerenz, Björn Kaiser, Christoph Lilje, Tilman Rath, Timo Agha, Ayman Vitali, Francesco Schäfer, Claus Schepp, Wolfgang Gundling, Felix |
author_facet | Krutzenbichler, Irmengard Dollhopf, Markus Diepolder, Helmut Eigler, Andreas Fuchs, Martin Herrmann, Simon Kleber, Gerhard Lewerenz, Björn Kaiser, Christoph Lilje, Tilman Rath, Timo Agha, Ayman Vitali, Francesco Schäfer, Claus Schepp, Wolfgang Gundling, Felix |
author_sort | Krutzenbichler, Irmengard |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) is a novel minimally invasive procedure that allows the resection of various lesions in the gastrointestinal tract including the colorectum. Real-world data outside of published studies are limited. The aim of this study was a detailed analysis of the outcomes of colonoscopic eFTR in different hospitals from different care levels in correlation with the number of endoscopists performing eFTR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this case series, the data of all patients who underwent eFTR between November 2014 and June 2019 (performed by a total of 22 endoscopists) in 7 hospitals were analyzed retrospectively regarding rates of technical success, R0 resection, and procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Colonoscopic eFTR was performed in 229 patients (64.6% men; average age 69.3 ± 10.3 years) mainly on the basis of the following indication: 69.9% difficult adenomas, 21.0% gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, and 7.9% subepithelial tumors. The average size of the lesions was 16.3 mm. Technical success rate of eFTR was achieved in 83.8% (binominal confidence interval 78.4–88.4%). Overall, histologically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 77.2% (CI 69.8–83.6%) while histologically proven full-wall excidate was confirmed in 90.0% (CI 85.1–93.7%). Of the resectates obtained (n = 210), 190 were resected en bloc (90.5%). We did not observe a clear improvement of technical success and R0 resection rate over time by the performing endoscopists. Altogether, procedure-related complications were observed in 17.5% (mostly moderate) including 2 cases of acute gangrenous appendicitis requiring operation. DISCUSSION: In this pooled analysis, eFTR represents a feasible, effective, and safe minimally invasive endoscopic technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8195906 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81959062021-06-28 Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels Krutzenbichler, Irmengard Dollhopf, Markus Diepolder, Helmut Eigler, Andreas Fuchs, Martin Herrmann, Simon Kleber, Gerhard Lewerenz, Björn Kaiser, Christoph Lilje, Tilman Rath, Timo Agha, Ayman Vitali, Francesco Schäfer, Claus Schepp, Wolfgang Gundling, Felix Surg Endosc Article INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) is a novel minimally invasive procedure that allows the resection of various lesions in the gastrointestinal tract including the colorectum. Real-world data outside of published studies are limited. The aim of this study was a detailed analysis of the outcomes of colonoscopic eFTR in different hospitals from different care levels in correlation with the number of endoscopists performing eFTR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this case series, the data of all patients who underwent eFTR between November 2014 and June 2019 (performed by a total of 22 endoscopists) in 7 hospitals were analyzed retrospectively regarding rates of technical success, R0 resection, and procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Colonoscopic eFTR was performed in 229 patients (64.6% men; average age 69.3 ± 10.3 years) mainly on the basis of the following indication: 69.9% difficult adenomas, 21.0% gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, and 7.9% subepithelial tumors. The average size of the lesions was 16.3 mm. Technical success rate of eFTR was achieved in 83.8% (binominal confidence interval 78.4–88.4%). Overall, histologically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 77.2% (CI 69.8–83.6%) while histologically proven full-wall excidate was confirmed in 90.0% (CI 85.1–93.7%). Of the resectates obtained (n = 210), 190 were resected en bloc (90.5%). We did not observe a clear improvement of technical success and R0 resection rate over time by the performing endoscopists. Altogether, procedure-related complications were observed in 17.5% (mostly moderate) including 2 cases of acute gangrenous appendicitis requiring operation. DISCUSSION: In this pooled analysis, eFTR represents a feasible, effective, and safe minimally invasive endoscopic technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-07-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8195906/ /pubmed/32648038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Krutzenbichler, Irmengard Dollhopf, Markus Diepolder, Helmut Eigler, Andreas Fuchs, Martin Herrmann, Simon Kleber, Gerhard Lewerenz, Björn Kaiser, Christoph Lilje, Tilman Rath, Timo Agha, Ayman Vitali, Francesco Schäfer, Claus Schepp, Wolfgang Gundling, Felix Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels |
title | Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels |
title_full | Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels |
title_fullStr | Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels |
title_full_unstemmed | Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels |
title_short | Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels |
title_sort | technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195906/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32648038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krutzenbichlerirmengard technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT dollhopfmarkus technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT diepolderhelmut technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT eiglerandreas technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT fuchsmartin technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT herrmannsimon technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT klebergerhard technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT lewerenzbjorn technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT kaiserchristoph technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT liljetilman technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT rathtimo technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT aghaayman technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT vitalifrancesco technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT schaferclaus technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT scheppwolfgang technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels AT gundlingfelix technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels |