Cargando…

Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) is a novel minimally invasive procedure that allows the resection of various lesions in the gastrointestinal tract including the colorectum. Real-world data outside of published studies are lim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krutzenbichler, Irmengard, Dollhopf, Markus, Diepolder, Helmut, Eigler, Andreas, Fuchs, Martin, Herrmann, Simon, Kleber, Gerhard, Lewerenz, Björn, Kaiser, Christoph, Lilje, Tilman, Rath, Timo, Agha, Ayman, Vitali, Francesco, Schäfer, Claus, Schepp, Wolfgang, Gundling, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32648038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5
_version_ 1783706580312653824
author Krutzenbichler, Irmengard
Dollhopf, Markus
Diepolder, Helmut
Eigler, Andreas
Fuchs, Martin
Herrmann, Simon
Kleber, Gerhard
Lewerenz, Björn
Kaiser, Christoph
Lilje, Tilman
Rath, Timo
Agha, Ayman
Vitali, Francesco
Schäfer, Claus
Schepp, Wolfgang
Gundling, Felix
author_facet Krutzenbichler, Irmengard
Dollhopf, Markus
Diepolder, Helmut
Eigler, Andreas
Fuchs, Martin
Herrmann, Simon
Kleber, Gerhard
Lewerenz, Björn
Kaiser, Christoph
Lilje, Tilman
Rath, Timo
Agha, Ayman
Vitali, Francesco
Schäfer, Claus
Schepp, Wolfgang
Gundling, Felix
author_sort Krutzenbichler, Irmengard
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) is a novel minimally invasive procedure that allows the resection of various lesions in the gastrointestinal tract including the colorectum. Real-world data outside of published studies are limited. The aim of this study was a detailed analysis of the outcomes of colonoscopic eFTR in different hospitals from different care levels in correlation with the number of endoscopists performing eFTR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this case series, the data of all patients who underwent eFTR between November 2014 and June 2019 (performed by a total of 22 endoscopists) in 7 hospitals were analyzed retrospectively regarding rates of technical success, R0 resection, and procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Colonoscopic eFTR was performed in 229 patients (64.6% men; average age 69.3 ± 10.3 years) mainly on the basis of the following indication: 69.9% difficult adenomas, 21.0% gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, and 7.9% subepithelial tumors. The average size of the lesions was 16.3 mm. Technical success rate of eFTR was achieved in 83.8% (binominal confidence interval 78.4–88.4%). Overall, histologically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 77.2% (CI 69.8–83.6%) while histologically proven full-wall excidate was confirmed in 90.0% (CI 85.1–93.7%). Of the resectates obtained (n = 210), 190 were resected en bloc (90.5%). We did not observe a clear improvement of technical success and R0 resection rate over time by the performing endoscopists. Altogether, procedure-related complications were observed in 17.5% (mostly moderate) including 2 cases of acute gangrenous appendicitis requiring operation. DISCUSSION: In this pooled analysis, eFTR represents a feasible, effective, and safe minimally invasive endoscopic technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8195906
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81959062021-06-28 Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels Krutzenbichler, Irmengard Dollhopf, Markus Diepolder, Helmut Eigler, Andreas Fuchs, Martin Herrmann, Simon Kleber, Gerhard Lewerenz, Björn Kaiser, Christoph Lilje, Tilman Rath, Timo Agha, Ayman Vitali, Francesco Schäfer, Claus Schepp, Wolfgang Gundling, Felix Surg Endosc Article INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) is a novel minimally invasive procedure that allows the resection of various lesions in the gastrointestinal tract including the colorectum. Real-world data outside of published studies are limited. The aim of this study was a detailed analysis of the outcomes of colonoscopic eFTR in different hospitals from different care levels in correlation with the number of endoscopists performing eFTR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this case series, the data of all patients who underwent eFTR between November 2014 and June 2019 (performed by a total of 22 endoscopists) in 7 hospitals were analyzed retrospectively regarding rates of technical success, R0 resection, and procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Colonoscopic eFTR was performed in 229 patients (64.6% men; average age 69.3 ± 10.3 years) mainly on the basis of the following indication: 69.9% difficult adenomas, 21.0% gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, and 7.9% subepithelial tumors. The average size of the lesions was 16.3 mm. Technical success rate of eFTR was achieved in 83.8% (binominal confidence interval 78.4–88.4%). Overall, histologically complete resection (R0) was achieved in 77.2% (CI 69.8–83.6%) while histologically proven full-wall excidate was confirmed in 90.0% (CI 85.1–93.7%). Of the resectates obtained (n = 210), 190 were resected en bloc (90.5%). We did not observe a clear improvement of technical success and R0 resection rate over time by the performing endoscopists. Altogether, procedure-related complications were observed in 17.5% (mostly moderate) including 2 cases of acute gangrenous appendicitis requiring operation. DISCUSSION: In this pooled analysis, eFTR represents a feasible, effective, and safe minimally invasive endoscopic technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-07-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8195906/ /pubmed/32648038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Krutzenbichler, Irmengard
Dollhopf, Markus
Diepolder, Helmut
Eigler, Andreas
Fuchs, Martin
Herrmann, Simon
Kleber, Gerhard
Lewerenz, Björn
Kaiser, Christoph
Lilje, Tilman
Rath, Timo
Agha, Ayman
Vitali, Francesco
Schäfer, Claus
Schepp, Wolfgang
Gundling, Felix
Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels
title Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels
title_full Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels
title_fullStr Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels
title_full_unstemmed Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels
title_short Technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels
title_sort technical success, resection status, and procedural complication rate of colonoscopic full-wall resection: a pooled analysis from 7 hospitals of different care levels
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32648038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07772-5
work_keys_str_mv AT krutzenbichlerirmengard technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT dollhopfmarkus technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT diepolderhelmut technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT eiglerandreas technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT fuchsmartin technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT herrmannsimon technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT klebergerhard technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT lewerenzbjorn technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT kaiserchristoph technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT liljetilman technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT rathtimo technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT aghaayman technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT vitalifrancesco technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT schaferclaus technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT scheppwolfgang technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels
AT gundlingfelix technicalsuccessresectionstatusandproceduralcomplicationrateofcolonoscopicfullwallresectionapooledanalysisfrom7hospitalsofdifferentcarelevels