Cargando…

A Combined microRNA and Chemokine Profile in Urine to Identify Rejection After Kidney Transplantation

There is an unmet need for noninvasive tools for diagnosis of rejection after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the discriminative value of a combined cellular and molecular biomarker platform in urine for the detection of rejection. METHODS. First, microRNA (miR) molecu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gielis, Els M., Anholts, Jacqueline D.H., van Beelen, Els, Haasnoot, Geert W., De Fijter, Hans W., Bajema, Ingeborg, Heidt, Sebastiaan, van de Vrie, Mathijs, Hilbrands, Luuk B., Mallat, Marko J.K., Ledeganck, Kristien J., Claas, Frans H.J., Eikmans, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001169
_version_ 1783706621097017344
author Gielis, Els M.
Anholts, Jacqueline D.H.
van Beelen, Els
Haasnoot, Geert W.
De Fijter, Hans W.
Bajema, Ingeborg
Heidt, Sebastiaan
van de Vrie, Mathijs
Hilbrands, Luuk B.
Mallat, Marko J.K.
Ledeganck, Kristien J.
Claas, Frans H.J.
Eikmans, Michael
author_facet Gielis, Els M.
Anholts, Jacqueline D.H.
van Beelen, Els
Haasnoot, Geert W.
De Fijter, Hans W.
Bajema, Ingeborg
Heidt, Sebastiaan
van de Vrie, Mathijs
Hilbrands, Luuk B.
Mallat, Marko J.K.
Ledeganck, Kristien J.
Claas, Frans H.J.
Eikmans, Michael
author_sort Gielis, Els M.
collection PubMed
description There is an unmet need for noninvasive tools for diagnosis of rejection after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the discriminative value of a combined cellular and molecular biomarker platform in urine for the detection of rejection. METHODS. First, microRNA (miR) molecules were screened in transplant biopsies and urine sediments of patients with acute rejection and patients without rejection and stable graft function. Second, the expression of 15 selected miRs was quantified in an independent set of 115 urine sediments of patients with rejection and 55 urine sediments of patients without histological signs of rejection on protocol biopsy. Additionally, CXCL-9 and CXCL-10 protein levels were quantified in the urine supernatant. RESULTS. Levels of miR-155-5p (5.7-fold), miR-126-3p (4.2-fold), miR-21-5p (3.7-fold), miR-25-3p (2.5-fold), and miR-615-3p (0.4-fold) were significantly different between rejection and no-rejection urine sediments. CXCL-9 and CXCL-10 levels were significantly elevated in urine from recipients with rejection. In a multivariable model (sensitivity: 89.1%, specificity: 75.6%, area under the curve: 0.94, P < 0.001), miR-155-5p, miR-615-3p, and CXCL-9 levels were independent predictors of rejection. Stratified 10-fold cross validation of the model resulted in an area under the curve of 0.92. CONCLUSIONS. A combined urinary microRNA and chemokine profile discriminates kidney transplant rejection from stable graft conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8196093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81960932021-06-14 A Combined microRNA and Chemokine Profile in Urine to Identify Rejection After Kidney Transplantation Gielis, Els M. Anholts, Jacqueline D.H. van Beelen, Els Haasnoot, Geert W. De Fijter, Hans W. Bajema, Ingeborg Heidt, Sebastiaan van de Vrie, Mathijs Hilbrands, Luuk B. Mallat, Marko J.K. Ledeganck, Kristien J. Claas, Frans H.J. Eikmans, Michael Transplant Direct Kidney Transplantation There is an unmet need for noninvasive tools for diagnosis of rejection after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the discriminative value of a combined cellular and molecular biomarker platform in urine for the detection of rejection. METHODS. First, microRNA (miR) molecules were screened in transplant biopsies and urine sediments of patients with acute rejection and patients without rejection and stable graft function. Second, the expression of 15 selected miRs was quantified in an independent set of 115 urine sediments of patients with rejection and 55 urine sediments of patients without histological signs of rejection on protocol biopsy. Additionally, CXCL-9 and CXCL-10 protein levels were quantified in the urine supernatant. RESULTS. Levels of miR-155-5p (5.7-fold), miR-126-3p (4.2-fold), miR-21-5p (3.7-fold), miR-25-3p (2.5-fold), and miR-615-3p (0.4-fold) were significantly different between rejection and no-rejection urine sediments. CXCL-9 and CXCL-10 levels were significantly elevated in urine from recipients with rejection. In a multivariable model (sensitivity: 89.1%, specificity: 75.6%, area under the curve: 0.94, P < 0.001), miR-155-5p, miR-615-3p, and CXCL-9 levels were independent predictors of rejection. Stratified 10-fold cross validation of the model resulted in an area under the curve of 0.92. CONCLUSIONS. A combined urinary microRNA and chemokine profile discriminates kidney transplant rejection from stable graft conditions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8196093/ /pubmed/34131583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001169 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Kidney Transplantation
Gielis, Els M.
Anholts, Jacqueline D.H.
van Beelen, Els
Haasnoot, Geert W.
De Fijter, Hans W.
Bajema, Ingeborg
Heidt, Sebastiaan
van de Vrie, Mathijs
Hilbrands, Luuk B.
Mallat, Marko J.K.
Ledeganck, Kristien J.
Claas, Frans H.J.
Eikmans, Michael
A Combined microRNA and Chemokine Profile in Urine to Identify Rejection After Kidney Transplantation
title A Combined microRNA and Chemokine Profile in Urine to Identify Rejection After Kidney Transplantation
title_full A Combined microRNA and Chemokine Profile in Urine to Identify Rejection After Kidney Transplantation
title_fullStr A Combined microRNA and Chemokine Profile in Urine to Identify Rejection After Kidney Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed A Combined microRNA and Chemokine Profile in Urine to Identify Rejection After Kidney Transplantation
title_short A Combined microRNA and Chemokine Profile in Urine to Identify Rejection After Kidney Transplantation
title_sort combined microrna and chemokine profile in urine to identify rejection after kidney transplantation
topic Kidney Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001169
work_keys_str_mv AT gieliselsm acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT anholtsjacquelinedh acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT vanbeelenels acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT haasnootgeertw acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT defijterhansw acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT bajemaingeborg acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT heidtsebastiaan acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT vandevriemathijs acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT hilbrandsluukb acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT mallatmarkojk acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT ledeganckkristienj acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT claasfranshj acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT eikmansmichael acombinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT gieliselsm combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT anholtsjacquelinedh combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT vanbeelenels combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT haasnootgeertw combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT defijterhansw combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT bajemaingeborg combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT heidtsebastiaan combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT vandevriemathijs combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT hilbrandsluukb combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT mallatmarkojk combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT ledeganckkristienj combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT claasfranshj combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation
AT eikmansmichael combinedmicrornaandchemokineprofileinurinetoidentifyrejectionafterkidneytransplantation