Cargando…

Scientific validation of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry compared to the IGAIS clinical scale for assessing wrinkles and scars after laser treatment

Measuring outcomes from treatments to the skin is either reliant upon patient’s subjective feedback or scale-based peer assessments. Three-Dimensional stereophotogrammetry intend to accurately quantify skin microtopography before and after treatments. The objective of this study is comparing the acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Machado, Barbara Helena Barcaro, De Melo E. Silva, Ivy Dantas, Pautrat, Walter Marou, Frame, James, Najlah, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91922-9
_version_ 1783706639282470912
author Machado, Barbara Helena Barcaro
De Melo E. Silva, Ivy Dantas
Pautrat, Walter Marou
Frame, James
Najlah, Mohammad
author_facet Machado, Barbara Helena Barcaro
De Melo E. Silva, Ivy Dantas
Pautrat, Walter Marou
Frame, James
Najlah, Mohammad
author_sort Machado, Barbara Helena Barcaro
collection PubMed
description Measuring outcomes from treatments to the skin is either reliant upon patient’s subjective feedback or scale-based peer assessments. Three-Dimensional stereophotogrammetry intend to accurately quantify skin microtopography before and after treatments. The objective of this study is comparing the accuracy of stereophotogrammetry with a scale-based peer evaluation in assessing topographical changes to skin surface following laser treatment. A 3D stereophotogrammetry system photographed skin surface of 48 patients with facial wrinkles or scars before and three months after laser resurfacing, followed immediately by topical application of vitamin C. The software measured changes in skin roughness, wrinkle depth and scar volume. Images were presented to three observers, each independently scoring cutaneous improvement according to Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (IGAIS). As for the results, a trend reflecting skin/scar improvement was reported by 3D SPM measurements and raters. The percentage of topographical change given by the raters matched 3D SPM findings. Agreement was highest when observers analysed 3D images. However, observers overestimated skin improvement in a nontreatment control whilst 3D SPM was precise in detecting absence of intervention. This study confirmed a direct correlation between the IGAIS clinical scale and 3D SPM and confirmed the efficacy and accuracy of the latter when assessing cutaneous microtopography alterations as a response to laser treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8196213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81962132021-06-15 Scientific validation of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry compared to the IGAIS clinical scale for assessing wrinkles and scars after laser treatment Machado, Barbara Helena Barcaro De Melo E. Silva, Ivy Dantas Pautrat, Walter Marou Frame, James Najlah, Mohammad Sci Rep Article Measuring outcomes from treatments to the skin is either reliant upon patient’s subjective feedback or scale-based peer assessments. Three-Dimensional stereophotogrammetry intend to accurately quantify skin microtopography before and after treatments. The objective of this study is comparing the accuracy of stereophotogrammetry with a scale-based peer evaluation in assessing topographical changes to skin surface following laser treatment. A 3D stereophotogrammetry system photographed skin surface of 48 patients with facial wrinkles or scars before and three months after laser resurfacing, followed immediately by topical application of vitamin C. The software measured changes in skin roughness, wrinkle depth and scar volume. Images were presented to three observers, each independently scoring cutaneous improvement according to Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (IGAIS). As for the results, a trend reflecting skin/scar improvement was reported by 3D SPM measurements and raters. The percentage of topographical change given by the raters matched 3D SPM findings. Agreement was highest when observers analysed 3D images. However, observers overestimated skin improvement in a nontreatment control whilst 3D SPM was precise in detecting absence of intervention. This study confirmed a direct correlation between the IGAIS clinical scale and 3D SPM and confirmed the efficacy and accuracy of the latter when assessing cutaneous microtopography alterations as a response to laser treatment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8196213/ /pubmed/34117340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91922-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Machado, Barbara Helena Barcaro
De Melo E. Silva, Ivy Dantas
Pautrat, Walter Marou
Frame, James
Najlah, Mohammad
Scientific validation of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry compared to the IGAIS clinical scale for assessing wrinkles and scars after laser treatment
title Scientific validation of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry compared to the IGAIS clinical scale for assessing wrinkles and scars after laser treatment
title_full Scientific validation of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry compared to the IGAIS clinical scale for assessing wrinkles and scars after laser treatment
title_fullStr Scientific validation of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry compared to the IGAIS clinical scale for assessing wrinkles and scars after laser treatment
title_full_unstemmed Scientific validation of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry compared to the IGAIS clinical scale for assessing wrinkles and scars after laser treatment
title_short Scientific validation of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry compared to the IGAIS clinical scale for assessing wrinkles and scars after laser treatment
title_sort scientific validation of three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry compared to the igais clinical scale for assessing wrinkles and scars after laser treatment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34117340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91922-9
work_keys_str_mv AT machadobarbarahelenabarcaro scientificvalidationofthreedimensionalstereophotogrammetrycomparedtotheigaisclinicalscaleforassessingwrinklesandscarsafterlasertreatment
AT demeloesilvaivydantas scientificvalidationofthreedimensionalstereophotogrammetrycomparedtotheigaisclinicalscaleforassessingwrinklesandscarsafterlasertreatment
AT pautratwaltermarou scientificvalidationofthreedimensionalstereophotogrammetrycomparedtotheigaisclinicalscaleforassessingwrinklesandscarsafterlasertreatment
AT framejames scientificvalidationofthreedimensionalstereophotogrammetrycomparedtotheigaisclinicalscaleforassessingwrinklesandscarsafterlasertreatment
AT najlahmohammad scientificvalidationofthreedimensionalstereophotogrammetrycomparedtotheigaisclinicalscaleforassessingwrinklesandscarsafterlasertreatment