Cargando…

The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders

OBJECTIVES: This meta-review integrates the findings of meta-analyses and systematic reviews to explore the effect of intervention programs on recidivism for juvenile offenders. METHODS: The systematic literature search gathered 48 meta-analyses and systematic reviews from 53 research reports, contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pappas, Laceé N., Dent, Amy L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z
_version_ 1783706650056589312
author Pappas, Laceé N.
Dent, Amy L.
author_facet Pappas, Laceé N.
Dent, Amy L.
author_sort Pappas, Laceé N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This meta-review integrates the findings of meta-analyses and systematic reviews to explore the effect of intervention programs on recidivism for juvenile offenders. METHODS: The systematic literature search gathered 48 meta-analyses and systematic reviews from 53 research reports, contributing 56 independent effect sizes for analysis. These effect sizes were statistically integrated, and five moderators of theoretical and methodological importance were tested using meta-regression. RESULTS: On average, intervention programs are associated with a significant reduction in recidivism (r(Φ) = −0.09, p < 0.001) for juvenile offenders who participate in a program compared to those who do not. However, reductions in recidivism significantly vary between the levels of criminal justice system, characteristics of juvenile offenders, types of program modalities, and methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that intervention programs can be an effective approach to reducing recidivism for juvenile offenders, especially when combined with a rehabilitative program modality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8196268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81962682021-06-15 The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders Pappas, Laceé N. Dent, Amy L. J Exp Criminol Article OBJECTIVES: This meta-review integrates the findings of meta-analyses and systematic reviews to explore the effect of intervention programs on recidivism for juvenile offenders. METHODS: The systematic literature search gathered 48 meta-analyses and systematic reviews from 53 research reports, contributing 56 independent effect sizes for analysis. These effect sizes were statistically integrated, and five moderators of theoretical and methodological importance were tested using meta-regression. RESULTS: On average, intervention programs are associated with a significant reduction in recidivism (r(Φ) = −0.09, p < 0.001) for juvenile offenders who participate in a program compared to those who do not. However, reductions in recidivism significantly vary between the levels of criminal justice system, characteristics of juvenile offenders, types of program modalities, and methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that intervention programs can be an effective approach to reducing recidivism for juvenile offenders, especially when combined with a rehabilitative program modality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z. Springer Netherlands 2021-06-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC8196268/ /pubmed/34149334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Pappas, Laceé N.
Dent, Amy L.
The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
title The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
title_full The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
title_fullStr The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
title_full_unstemmed The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
title_short The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
title_sort 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z
work_keys_str_mv AT pappaslaceen the40yeardebateametareviewonwhatworksforjuvenileoffenders
AT dentamyl the40yeardebateametareviewonwhatworksforjuvenileoffenders
AT pappaslaceen 40yeardebateametareviewonwhatworksforjuvenileoffenders
AT dentamyl 40yeardebateametareviewonwhatworksforjuvenileoffenders