Cargando…
The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders
OBJECTIVES: This meta-review integrates the findings of meta-analyses and systematic reviews to explore the effect of intervention programs on recidivism for juvenile offenders. METHODS: The systematic literature search gathered 48 meta-analyses and systematic reviews from 53 research reports, contr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z |
_version_ | 1783706650056589312 |
---|---|
author | Pappas, Laceé N. Dent, Amy L. |
author_facet | Pappas, Laceé N. Dent, Amy L. |
author_sort | Pappas, Laceé N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This meta-review integrates the findings of meta-analyses and systematic reviews to explore the effect of intervention programs on recidivism for juvenile offenders. METHODS: The systematic literature search gathered 48 meta-analyses and systematic reviews from 53 research reports, contributing 56 independent effect sizes for analysis. These effect sizes were statistically integrated, and five moderators of theoretical and methodological importance were tested using meta-regression. RESULTS: On average, intervention programs are associated with a significant reduction in recidivism (r(Φ) = −0.09, p < 0.001) for juvenile offenders who participate in a program compared to those who do not. However, reductions in recidivism significantly vary between the levels of criminal justice system, characteristics of juvenile offenders, types of program modalities, and methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that intervention programs can be an effective approach to reducing recidivism for juvenile offenders, especially when combined with a rehabilitative program modality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8196268 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81962682021-06-15 The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders Pappas, Laceé N. Dent, Amy L. J Exp Criminol Article OBJECTIVES: This meta-review integrates the findings of meta-analyses and systematic reviews to explore the effect of intervention programs on recidivism for juvenile offenders. METHODS: The systematic literature search gathered 48 meta-analyses and systematic reviews from 53 research reports, contributing 56 independent effect sizes for analysis. These effect sizes were statistically integrated, and five moderators of theoretical and methodological importance were tested using meta-regression. RESULTS: On average, intervention programs are associated with a significant reduction in recidivism (r(Φ) = −0.09, p < 0.001) for juvenile offenders who participate in a program compared to those who do not. However, reductions in recidivism significantly vary between the levels of criminal justice system, characteristics of juvenile offenders, types of program modalities, and methodological quality. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that intervention programs can be an effective approach to reducing recidivism for juvenile offenders, especially when combined with a rehabilitative program modality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z. Springer Netherlands 2021-06-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC8196268/ /pubmed/34149334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Pappas, Laceé N. Dent, Amy L. The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders |
title | The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders |
title_full | The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders |
title_fullStr | The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders |
title_full_unstemmed | The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders |
title_short | The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders |
title_sort | 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196268/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34149334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pappaslaceen the40yeardebateametareviewonwhatworksforjuvenileoffenders AT dentamyl the40yeardebateametareviewonwhatworksforjuvenileoffenders AT pappaslaceen 40yeardebateametareviewonwhatworksforjuvenileoffenders AT dentamyl 40yeardebateametareviewonwhatworksforjuvenileoffenders |