Cargando…
Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements
This systematic review aims to evaluate the different pretreatments of the zirconia surface and resin cement in order to determine a valid operative protocol for adhesive cementation. Methodologies conducted for this study followed the Prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Met...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112751 |
_version_ | 1783706804608303104 |
---|---|
author | Comino-Garayoa, Rubén Peláez, Jesús Tobar, Celia Rodríguez, Verónica Suárez, María Jesús |
author_facet | Comino-Garayoa, Rubén Peláez, Jesús Tobar, Celia Rodríguez, Verónica Suárez, María Jesús |
author_sort | Comino-Garayoa, Rubén |
collection | PubMed |
description | This systematic review aims to evaluate the different pretreatments of the zirconia surface and resin cement in order to determine a valid operative protocol for adhesive cementation. Methodologies conducted for this study followed the Prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. An electronic search was performed in four databases. The established focus question was: “What type of surface conditioning method is the one that obtains the best adhesion values to zirconia over time by applying a resin cement?” Forty-five relevant papers were found to qualify for final inclusion. In total, 260 different surface pretreatment methods, mainly combinations of air-abrasion protocols and adhesive promoters, were investigated. Altogether, the use of two artificial aging methods, three types of cement and four testing methods was reported. The results showed that mechanicochemical surface pretreatments offered the best adhesive results. Self-adhesive cement and those containing 10-MDP obtained the best results in adhesion to zirconia. Artificial aging reduced adhesion, so storage in water for 30 days or thermocycling for 5000 cycles is recommended. A standardized adhesive protocol has not been established due to a lack of evidence |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8196946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81969462021-06-13 Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements Comino-Garayoa, Rubén Peláez, Jesús Tobar, Celia Rodríguez, Verónica Suárez, María Jesús Materials (Basel) Review This systematic review aims to evaluate the different pretreatments of the zirconia surface and resin cement in order to determine a valid operative protocol for adhesive cementation. Methodologies conducted for this study followed the Prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. An electronic search was performed in four databases. The established focus question was: “What type of surface conditioning method is the one that obtains the best adhesion values to zirconia over time by applying a resin cement?” Forty-five relevant papers were found to qualify for final inclusion. In total, 260 different surface pretreatment methods, mainly combinations of air-abrasion protocols and adhesive promoters, were investigated. Altogether, the use of two artificial aging methods, three types of cement and four testing methods was reported. The results showed that mechanicochemical surface pretreatments offered the best adhesive results. Self-adhesive cement and those containing 10-MDP obtained the best results in adhesion to zirconia. Artificial aging reduced adhesion, so storage in water for 30 days or thermocycling for 5000 cycles is recommended. A standardized adhesive protocol has not been established due to a lack of evidence MDPI 2021-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8196946/ /pubmed/34067501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112751 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Comino-Garayoa, Rubén Peláez, Jesús Tobar, Celia Rodríguez, Verónica Suárez, María Jesús Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements |
title | Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements |
title_full | Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements |
title_fullStr | Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements |
title_full_unstemmed | Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements |
title_short | Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements |
title_sort | adhesion to zirconia: a systematic review of surface pretreatments and resin cements |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112751 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cominogarayoaruben adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements AT pelaezjesus adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements AT tobarcelia adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements AT rodriguezveronica adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements AT suarezmariajesus adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements |