Cargando…

Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements

This systematic review aims to evaluate the different pretreatments of the zirconia surface and resin cement in order to determine a valid operative protocol for adhesive cementation. Methodologies conducted for this study followed the Prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Comino-Garayoa, Rubén, Peláez, Jesús, Tobar, Celia, Rodríguez, Verónica, Suárez, María Jesús
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067501
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112751
_version_ 1783706804608303104
author Comino-Garayoa, Rubén
Peláez, Jesús
Tobar, Celia
Rodríguez, Verónica
Suárez, María Jesús
author_facet Comino-Garayoa, Rubén
Peláez, Jesús
Tobar, Celia
Rodríguez, Verónica
Suárez, María Jesús
author_sort Comino-Garayoa, Rubén
collection PubMed
description This systematic review aims to evaluate the different pretreatments of the zirconia surface and resin cement in order to determine a valid operative protocol for adhesive cementation. Methodologies conducted for this study followed the Prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. An electronic search was performed in four databases. The established focus question was: “What type of surface conditioning method is the one that obtains the best adhesion values to zirconia over time by applying a resin cement?” Forty-five relevant papers were found to qualify for final inclusion. In total, 260 different surface pretreatment methods, mainly combinations of air-abrasion protocols and adhesive promoters, were investigated. Altogether, the use of two artificial aging methods, three types of cement and four testing methods was reported. The results showed that mechanicochemical surface pretreatments offered the best adhesive results. Self-adhesive cement and those containing 10-MDP obtained the best results in adhesion to zirconia. Artificial aging reduced adhesion, so storage in water for 30 days or thermocycling for 5000 cycles is recommended. A standardized adhesive protocol has not been established due to a lack of evidence
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8196946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81969462021-06-13 Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements Comino-Garayoa, Rubén Peláez, Jesús Tobar, Celia Rodríguez, Verónica Suárez, María Jesús Materials (Basel) Review This systematic review aims to evaluate the different pretreatments of the zirconia surface and resin cement in order to determine a valid operative protocol for adhesive cementation. Methodologies conducted for this study followed the Prisma (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. An electronic search was performed in four databases. The established focus question was: “What type of surface conditioning method is the one that obtains the best adhesion values to zirconia over time by applying a resin cement?” Forty-five relevant papers were found to qualify for final inclusion. In total, 260 different surface pretreatment methods, mainly combinations of air-abrasion protocols and adhesive promoters, were investigated. Altogether, the use of two artificial aging methods, three types of cement and four testing methods was reported. The results showed that mechanicochemical surface pretreatments offered the best adhesive results. Self-adhesive cement and those containing 10-MDP obtained the best results in adhesion to zirconia. Artificial aging reduced adhesion, so storage in water for 30 days or thermocycling for 5000 cycles is recommended. A standardized adhesive protocol has not been established due to a lack of evidence MDPI 2021-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8196946/ /pubmed/34067501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112751 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Comino-Garayoa, Rubén
Peláez, Jesús
Tobar, Celia
Rodríguez, Verónica
Suárez, María Jesús
Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements
title Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements
title_full Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements
title_fullStr Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements
title_full_unstemmed Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements
title_short Adhesion to Zirconia: A Systematic Review of Surface Pretreatments and Resin Cements
title_sort adhesion to zirconia: a systematic review of surface pretreatments and resin cements
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8196946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34067501
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112751
work_keys_str_mv AT cominogarayoaruben adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements
AT pelaezjesus adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements
AT tobarcelia adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements
AT rodriguezveronica adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements
AT suarezmariajesus adhesiontozirconiaasystematicreviewofsurfacepretreatmentsandresincements