Cargando…
Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential?
Since 2006, the foam replica method has been commonly recognized as a valuable technology for the production of highly porous bioactive glass scaffolds showing three-dimensional, open-cell structures closely mimicking that of natural trabecular bone. Despite this, there are important drawbacks makin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112795 |
_version_ | 1783706902923837440 |
---|---|
author | Fiume, Elisa Ciavattini, Sara Verné, Enrica Baino, Francesco |
author_facet | Fiume, Elisa Ciavattini, Sara Verné, Enrica Baino, Francesco |
author_sort | Fiume, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since 2006, the foam replica method has been commonly recognized as a valuable technology for the production of highly porous bioactive glass scaffolds showing three-dimensional, open-cell structures closely mimicking that of natural trabecular bone. Despite this, there are important drawbacks making the usage of foam-replicated glass scaffolds a difficult achievement in clinical practice; among these, certainly the high operator-dependency of the overall manufacturing process is one of the most crucial, limiting the scalability to industrial production and, thus, the spread of foam-replicated synthetic bone substitutes for effective use in routine management of bone defect. The present review opens a window on the versatile world of the foam replica technique, focusing the dissertation on scaffold properties analyzed in relation to various processing parameters, in order to better understand which are the real issues behind the bottleneck that still puts this technology on the Olympus of the most used techniques in laboratory practice, without moving, unfortunately, to a more concrete application. Specifically, scaffold morphology, mechanical and mass transport properties will be reviewed in detail, considering the various templates proposed till now by several research groups all over the world. In the end, a comprehensive overview of in vivo studies on bioactive glass foams will be provided, in order to put an emphasis on scaffold performances in a complex three-dimensional environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8197364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81973642021-06-13 Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential? Fiume, Elisa Ciavattini, Sara Verné, Enrica Baino, Francesco Materials (Basel) Review Since 2006, the foam replica method has been commonly recognized as a valuable technology for the production of highly porous bioactive glass scaffolds showing three-dimensional, open-cell structures closely mimicking that of natural trabecular bone. Despite this, there are important drawbacks making the usage of foam-replicated glass scaffolds a difficult achievement in clinical practice; among these, certainly the high operator-dependency of the overall manufacturing process is one of the most crucial, limiting the scalability to industrial production and, thus, the spread of foam-replicated synthetic bone substitutes for effective use in routine management of bone defect. The present review opens a window on the versatile world of the foam replica technique, focusing the dissertation on scaffold properties analyzed in relation to various processing parameters, in order to better understand which are the real issues behind the bottleneck that still puts this technology on the Olympus of the most used techniques in laboratory practice, without moving, unfortunately, to a more concrete application. Specifically, scaffold morphology, mechanical and mass transport properties will be reviewed in detail, considering the various templates proposed till now by several research groups all over the world. In the end, a comprehensive overview of in vivo studies on bioactive glass foams will be provided, in order to put an emphasis on scaffold performances in a complex three-dimensional environment. MDPI 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8197364/ /pubmed/34073945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112795 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Fiume, Elisa Ciavattini, Sara Verné, Enrica Baino, Francesco Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential? |
title | Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential? |
title_full | Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential? |
title_fullStr | Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential? |
title_full_unstemmed | Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential? |
title_short | Foam Replica Method in the Manufacturing of Bioactive Glass Scaffolds: Out-of-Date Technology or Still Underexploited Potential? |
title_sort | foam replica method in the manufacturing of bioactive glass scaffolds: out-of-date technology or still underexploited potential? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112795 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fiumeelisa foamreplicamethodinthemanufacturingofbioactiveglassscaffoldsoutofdatetechnologyorstillunderexploitedpotential AT ciavattinisara foamreplicamethodinthemanufacturingofbioactiveglassscaffoldsoutofdatetechnologyorstillunderexploitedpotential AT verneenrica foamreplicamethodinthemanufacturingofbioactiveglassscaffoldsoutofdatetechnologyorstillunderexploitedpotential AT bainofrancesco foamreplicamethodinthemanufacturingofbioactiveglassscaffoldsoutofdatetechnologyorstillunderexploitedpotential |