Cargando…
Comparison of Jaw Elevation Device vs. Conventional Airway Assist during Sedation in Chronic Kidney Diseases Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) are likely to have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) underdiagnosed, and maintaining airway patency is important during sedation. This study compared Jaw elevation device (JED) with conventional airway interventions (head lateral rotation, neck extension, oral o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34074066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112280 |
_version_ | 1783706904573247488 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sang Hyun Jeong, Ji Seon Jang, Jaeni Shin, Young Hee Gil, Nam-Su Choi, Ji-won Hahm, Tae Soo |
author_facet | Lee, Sang Hyun Jeong, Ji Seon Jang, Jaeni Shin, Young Hee Gil, Nam-Su Choi, Ji-won Hahm, Tae Soo |
author_sort | Lee, Sang Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) are likely to have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) underdiagnosed, and maintaining airway patency is important during sedation. This study compared Jaw elevation device (JED) with conventional airway interventions (head lateral rotation, neck extension, oral or nasal airway insertion, and jaw thrust maneuver) during sedation and hypothesized that JED may be effective to open the airway. A total of 73 patients were allocated to a conventional group (n = 39) and a JED group (n = 34). The number of additional airway interventions was the primary outcome. Percentage of patients with no need of additional interventions and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were secondary outcomes. The number of additional interventions was significantly less in the JED group compared to the conventional group (0 (0–0) vs. 1 (0–2); p = 0.002). The percentage of patients with no requirement for additional interventions was significantly higher in the JED group compared to the conventional group (76.5% vs. 43.6%; p = 0.004). AHI was significantly lower in the JED group compared to the conventional group (4.5 (1.5–11.9) vs. 9.3 (3.8–21.9), p = 0.015). In conclusion, JED seems to be effective in opening the airway patency during sedation in CRF patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8197371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81973712021-06-13 Comparison of Jaw Elevation Device vs. Conventional Airway Assist during Sedation in Chronic Kidney Diseases Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Lee, Sang Hyun Jeong, Ji Seon Jang, Jaeni Shin, Young Hee Gil, Nam-Su Choi, Ji-won Hahm, Tae Soo J Clin Med Article Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) are likely to have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) underdiagnosed, and maintaining airway patency is important during sedation. This study compared Jaw elevation device (JED) with conventional airway interventions (head lateral rotation, neck extension, oral or nasal airway insertion, and jaw thrust maneuver) during sedation and hypothesized that JED may be effective to open the airway. A total of 73 patients were allocated to a conventional group (n = 39) and a JED group (n = 34). The number of additional airway interventions was the primary outcome. Percentage of patients with no need of additional interventions and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were secondary outcomes. The number of additional interventions was significantly less in the JED group compared to the conventional group (0 (0–0) vs. 1 (0–2); p = 0.002). The percentage of patients with no requirement for additional interventions was significantly higher in the JED group compared to the conventional group (76.5% vs. 43.6%; p = 0.004). AHI was significantly lower in the JED group compared to the conventional group (4.5 (1.5–11.9) vs. 9.3 (3.8–21.9), p = 0.015). In conclusion, JED seems to be effective in opening the airway patency during sedation in CRF patients. MDPI 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8197371/ /pubmed/34074066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112280 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Sang Hyun Jeong, Ji Seon Jang, Jaeni Shin, Young Hee Gil, Nam-Su Choi, Ji-won Hahm, Tae Soo Comparison of Jaw Elevation Device vs. Conventional Airway Assist during Sedation in Chronic Kidney Diseases Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Comparison of Jaw Elevation Device vs. Conventional Airway Assist during Sedation in Chronic Kidney Diseases Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Comparison of Jaw Elevation Device vs. Conventional Airway Assist during Sedation in Chronic Kidney Diseases Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Jaw Elevation Device vs. Conventional Airway Assist during Sedation in Chronic Kidney Diseases Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Jaw Elevation Device vs. Conventional Airway Assist during Sedation in Chronic Kidney Diseases Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Comparison of Jaw Elevation Device vs. Conventional Airway Assist during Sedation in Chronic Kidney Diseases Undergoing Arteriovenous Fistula Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparison of jaw elevation device vs. conventional airway assist during sedation in chronic kidney diseases undergoing arteriovenous fistula surgery: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34074066 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesanghyun comparisonofjawelevationdevicevsconventionalairwayassistduringsedationinchronickidneydiseasesundergoingarteriovenousfistulasurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jeongjiseon comparisonofjawelevationdevicevsconventionalairwayassistduringsedationinchronickidneydiseasesundergoingarteriovenousfistulasurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jangjaeni comparisonofjawelevationdevicevsconventionalairwayassistduringsedationinchronickidneydiseasesundergoingarteriovenousfistulasurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shinyounghee comparisonofjawelevationdevicevsconventionalairwayassistduringsedationinchronickidneydiseasesundergoingarteriovenousfistulasurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gilnamsu comparisonofjawelevationdevicevsconventionalairwayassistduringsedationinchronickidneydiseasesundergoingarteriovenousfistulasurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choijiwon comparisonofjawelevationdevicevsconventionalairwayassistduringsedationinchronickidneydiseasesundergoingarteriovenousfistulasurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hahmtaesoo comparisonofjawelevationdevicevsconventionalairwayassistduringsedationinchronickidneydiseasesundergoingarteriovenousfistulasurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial |