Cargando…

Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE: Daratumumab (DARA) is a humanized anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and approved as monotherapy or in combination with standard of care regimens for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). DARA intravenous (IV) administration is time-consuming; availability of DARA subcutaneous (SC) is expected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slavcev, Mary, Spinelli, Allison, Absalon, Elisabeth, Masterson, Tara, Heuck, Christoph, Lam, Annette, De Cock, Erwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135605
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S302682
_version_ 1783706948613439488
author Slavcev, Mary
Spinelli, Allison
Absalon, Elisabeth
Masterson, Tara
Heuck, Christoph
Lam, Annette
De Cock, Erwin
author_facet Slavcev, Mary
Spinelli, Allison
Absalon, Elisabeth
Masterson, Tara
Heuck, Christoph
Lam, Annette
De Cock, Erwin
author_sort Slavcev, Mary
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Daratumumab (DARA) is a humanized anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and approved as monotherapy or in combination with standard of care regimens for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). DARA intravenous (IV) administration is time-consuming; availability of DARA subcutaneous (SC) is expected to reduce this burden. A time and motion survey was undertaken to elicit healthcare providers’ (HCPs’) understanding of the workflow and time estimates for administration of DARA IV and SC (beyond treatment time) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This web-based, prospective survey collected data from HCPs at sites that actively enrolled patients in the phase 3 COLUMBA trial, a multicenter, noninferiority study of DARA IV versus DARA SC. Data collection included time actively spent on pre-specified drug preparation and drug administration/patient care activities; active HCP and chair time were extrapolated for first and subsequent treatments. RESULTS: Compared with DARA IV, DARA SC reduced median total active HCP time by 63.8% (from 265.9 to 96.3 minutes) and 49.5% (from 179.2 to 90.4 minutes) for first and subsequent treatments, respectively. When extrapolated to the anticipated number of treatments per year (23 in Year 1 and 13 in Year 2, per label), estimated active HCP time per patient was reduced by 50% in Years 1 (from 70.1 to 34.8 hours) and 2 (from 38.8 to 19.6 hours) for DARA SC versus DARA IV. Estimated chair time for DARA SC was decreased by 97% versus DARA IV for first (from 456.9 to 13.3 minutes) and subsequent treatments (from 238.0 to 8.1 minutes). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that DARA SC is associated with less active HCP involvement during drug preparation and drug administration/patient care compared with DARA IV, potentially reducing burdens on patients and caregivers and creating efficiencies for HCPs and healthcare facilities, allowing more patients access to care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8197571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81975712021-06-15 Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Slavcev, Mary Spinelli, Allison Absalon, Elisabeth Masterson, Tara Heuck, Christoph Lam, Annette De Cock, Erwin Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research PURPOSE: Daratumumab (DARA) is a humanized anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and approved as monotherapy or in combination with standard of care regimens for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). DARA intravenous (IV) administration is time-consuming; availability of DARA subcutaneous (SC) is expected to reduce this burden. A time and motion survey was undertaken to elicit healthcare providers’ (HCPs’) understanding of the workflow and time estimates for administration of DARA IV and SC (beyond treatment time) in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This web-based, prospective survey collected data from HCPs at sites that actively enrolled patients in the phase 3 COLUMBA trial, a multicenter, noninferiority study of DARA IV versus DARA SC. Data collection included time actively spent on pre-specified drug preparation and drug administration/patient care activities; active HCP and chair time were extrapolated for first and subsequent treatments. RESULTS: Compared with DARA IV, DARA SC reduced median total active HCP time by 63.8% (from 265.9 to 96.3 minutes) and 49.5% (from 179.2 to 90.4 minutes) for first and subsequent treatments, respectively. When extrapolated to the anticipated number of treatments per year (23 in Year 1 and 13 in Year 2, per label), estimated active HCP time per patient was reduced by 50% in Years 1 (from 70.1 to 34.8 hours) and 2 (from 38.8 to 19.6 hours) for DARA SC versus DARA IV. Estimated chair time for DARA SC was decreased by 97% versus DARA IV for first (from 456.9 to 13.3 minutes) and subsequent treatments (from 238.0 to 8.1 minutes). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that DARA SC is associated with less active HCP involvement during drug preparation and drug administration/patient care compared with DARA IV, potentially reducing burdens on patients and caregivers and creating efficiencies for HCPs and healthcare facilities, allowing more patients access to care. Dove 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8197571/ /pubmed/34135605 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S302682 Text en © 2021 Slavcev et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Slavcev, Mary
Spinelli, Allison
Absalon, Elisabeth
Masterson, Tara
Heuck, Christoph
Lam, Annette
De Cock, Erwin
Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_full Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_fullStr Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_short Results of a Time and Motion Survey Regarding Subcutaneous versus Intravenous Administration of Daratumumab in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
title_sort results of a time and motion survey regarding subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135605
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S302682
work_keys_str_mv AT slavcevmary resultsofatimeandmotionsurveyregardingsubcutaneousversusintravenousadministrationofdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT spinelliallison resultsofatimeandmotionsurveyregardingsubcutaneousversusintravenousadministrationofdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT absalonelisabeth resultsofatimeandmotionsurveyregardingsubcutaneousversusintravenousadministrationofdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT mastersontara resultsofatimeandmotionsurveyregardingsubcutaneousversusintravenousadministrationofdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT heuckchristoph resultsofatimeandmotionsurveyregardingsubcutaneousversusintravenousadministrationofdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT lamannette resultsofatimeandmotionsurveyregardingsubcutaneousversusintravenousadministrationofdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma
AT decockerwin resultsofatimeandmotionsurveyregardingsubcutaneousversusintravenousadministrationofdaratumumabinpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymultiplemyeloma