Cargando…

Cervical Cancer Screening Among Marginalized Women: A Cross-Sectional Intervention Study

BACKGROUND: Many countries organize population-based cervical cancer screening programs (CSP). In the Netherlands, eligible women are invited by mail. Marginalized women living in unstable conditions and homeless women often fail to receive the invitation letter. These women also experience access b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bongaerts, Thomas H G, Ridder, Marlieke, Vermeer-Mens, Josephina C J, Plukkel, Jeanette J, Numans, Mattijs E, Büchner, Frederike L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135643
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S302002
_version_ 1783706952271921152
author Bongaerts, Thomas H G
Ridder, Marlieke
Vermeer-Mens, Josephina C J
Plukkel, Jeanette J
Numans, Mattijs E
Büchner, Frederike L
author_facet Bongaerts, Thomas H G
Ridder, Marlieke
Vermeer-Mens, Josephina C J
Plukkel, Jeanette J
Numans, Mattijs E
Büchner, Frederike L
author_sort Bongaerts, Thomas H G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many countries organize population-based cervical cancer screening programs (CSP). In the Netherlands, eligible women are invited by mail. Marginalized women living in unstable conditions and homeless women often fail to receive the invitation letter. These women also experience access barriers to regular healthcare. Consequently, despite presumably being at higher risk of developing cervical cancer due to prevalent risk factors, marginalized women are rarely screened for cervical cancer. The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence of (pre)cancerous abnormalities among marginalized women, and subsequently explore invitation approaches to enhance their screening participation. METHODS: A cross-sectional intervention study was conducted in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Between February and May 2019, marginalized women aged 20–60 years were invited to participate in cervical screening. A participant was considered screen-positive when they tested positive for high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) and showed cytological abnormalities. Data of the study population were compared with regional data of the Dutch CSP. Various invitation approaches were used to recruit women. RESULTS: Out of 74 included women, 12 participants (16%) were found screen-positive, against 3.4% in women screened by the Dutch CSP. The prevalence ratio for the study population was 4.4 (95% CI 1.9–8.6) compared with women screened by the Dutch CSP. Using a direct, pro-active approach resulted in participation of 92% of the included women. CONCLUSION: Marginalized women have an increased risk of (pre)cancerous cervical abnormalities in screening, compared with women screened by the Dutch CSP. A direct pro-active approach was the most effective to stimulate screening participation. Enhancement of screening uptake for this population needs special effort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8197586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81975862021-06-15 Cervical Cancer Screening Among Marginalized Women: A Cross-Sectional Intervention Study Bongaerts, Thomas H G Ridder, Marlieke Vermeer-Mens, Josephina C J Plukkel, Jeanette J Numans, Mattijs E Büchner, Frederike L Int J Womens Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Many countries organize population-based cervical cancer screening programs (CSP). In the Netherlands, eligible women are invited by mail. Marginalized women living in unstable conditions and homeless women often fail to receive the invitation letter. These women also experience access barriers to regular healthcare. Consequently, despite presumably being at higher risk of developing cervical cancer due to prevalent risk factors, marginalized women are rarely screened for cervical cancer. The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence of (pre)cancerous abnormalities among marginalized women, and subsequently explore invitation approaches to enhance their screening participation. METHODS: A cross-sectional intervention study was conducted in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Between February and May 2019, marginalized women aged 20–60 years were invited to participate in cervical screening. A participant was considered screen-positive when they tested positive for high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) and showed cytological abnormalities. Data of the study population were compared with regional data of the Dutch CSP. Various invitation approaches were used to recruit women. RESULTS: Out of 74 included women, 12 participants (16%) were found screen-positive, against 3.4% in women screened by the Dutch CSP. The prevalence ratio for the study population was 4.4 (95% CI 1.9–8.6) compared with women screened by the Dutch CSP. Using a direct, pro-active approach resulted in participation of 92% of the included women. CONCLUSION: Marginalized women have an increased risk of (pre)cancerous cervical abnormalities in screening, compared with women screened by the Dutch CSP. A direct pro-active approach was the most effective to stimulate screening participation. Enhancement of screening uptake for this population needs special effort. Dove 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8197586/ /pubmed/34135643 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S302002 Text en © 2021 Bongaerts et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bongaerts, Thomas H G
Ridder, Marlieke
Vermeer-Mens, Josephina C J
Plukkel, Jeanette J
Numans, Mattijs E
Büchner, Frederike L
Cervical Cancer Screening Among Marginalized Women: A Cross-Sectional Intervention Study
title Cervical Cancer Screening Among Marginalized Women: A Cross-Sectional Intervention Study
title_full Cervical Cancer Screening Among Marginalized Women: A Cross-Sectional Intervention Study
title_fullStr Cervical Cancer Screening Among Marginalized Women: A Cross-Sectional Intervention Study
title_full_unstemmed Cervical Cancer Screening Among Marginalized Women: A Cross-Sectional Intervention Study
title_short Cervical Cancer Screening Among Marginalized Women: A Cross-Sectional Intervention Study
title_sort cervical cancer screening among marginalized women: a cross-sectional intervention study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135643
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S302002
work_keys_str_mv AT bongaertsthomashg cervicalcancerscreeningamongmarginalizedwomenacrosssectionalinterventionstudy
AT riddermarlieke cervicalcancerscreeningamongmarginalizedwomenacrosssectionalinterventionstudy
AT vermeermensjosephinacj cervicalcancerscreeningamongmarginalizedwomenacrosssectionalinterventionstudy
AT plukkeljeanettej cervicalcancerscreeningamongmarginalizedwomenacrosssectionalinterventionstudy
AT numansmattijse cervicalcancerscreeningamongmarginalizedwomenacrosssectionalinterventionstudy
AT buchnerfrederikel cervicalcancerscreeningamongmarginalizedwomenacrosssectionalinterventionstudy