Cargando…
Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation
PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare the existing soft contact lens (CL) materials regarding their influence on bacterial biofilm formation and adhesion susceptibility. Then, the study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of various disinfecting solutions and evaluate the ability of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135567 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S310862 |
_version_ | 1783706960723443712 |
---|---|
author | Mordmuang, Auemphon Udomwech, Lunla Karnjana, Kulwadee |
author_facet | Mordmuang, Auemphon Udomwech, Lunla Karnjana, Kulwadee |
author_sort | Mordmuang, Auemphon |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare the existing soft contact lens (CL) materials regarding their influence on bacterial biofilm formation and adhesion susceptibility. Then, the study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of various disinfecting solutions and evaluate the ability of cleaning regimens in terms of anti-bacterial adhesion and biofilm removal on different soft CL materials. METHODS: Bacterial biofilm formation on CLs was evaluated by biomass assay. Adhesion assay and standard plate count were carried out at time-interval periods within 24 h. Various CL disinfecting procedures were assessed for their efficacy to remove biofilm and reduce bacterial adhesion. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed for the morphological assessment of bacterial biofilm. RESULTS: Printed hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) CLs significantly demonstrated more biofilm staining and bacterial attachment when compared with non-printed HEMA CLs, while the Filcon II 3 and Nesofilcon A CLs possessed less biofilm biomass and adherent cells. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa represented the highest biofilm producing bacteria on HEMA-based materials in this study. The disinfecting regimen with the highest efficacy was the two-step system, first using multipurpose disinfecting solution containing edetate disodium and sorbic acid (MPDS+EDSA), followed by soaking in multipurpose solution (MPS). The regimen demonstrated the greatest effect against the pre-formed biofilm and the adhesion activity of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa on the soft CLs. The SEM micrographs confirmed the morphological changes of bacterial biofilm after disinfecting and revealed that the two-step system treated CLs displayed less adherent bacteria. CONCLUSION: HEMA-based soft CLs may facilitate bacterial biofilm formation and adhesion capability. The two-step system was the most effective regimen for biofilm removal, where the soaking period in the disinfecting solution of the no-rub regimen should last more than 6 h to remove pre-formed biofilm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8197623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81976232021-06-15 Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation Mordmuang, Auemphon Udomwech, Lunla Karnjana, Kulwadee Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The present study aimed to compare the existing soft contact lens (CL) materials regarding their influence on bacterial biofilm formation and adhesion susceptibility. Then, the study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of various disinfecting solutions and evaluate the ability of cleaning regimens in terms of anti-bacterial adhesion and biofilm removal on different soft CL materials. METHODS: Bacterial biofilm formation on CLs was evaluated by biomass assay. Adhesion assay and standard plate count were carried out at time-interval periods within 24 h. Various CL disinfecting procedures were assessed for their efficacy to remove biofilm and reduce bacterial adhesion. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed for the morphological assessment of bacterial biofilm. RESULTS: Printed hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) CLs significantly demonstrated more biofilm staining and bacterial attachment when compared with non-printed HEMA CLs, while the Filcon II 3 and Nesofilcon A CLs possessed less biofilm biomass and adherent cells. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa represented the highest biofilm producing bacteria on HEMA-based materials in this study. The disinfecting regimen with the highest efficacy was the two-step system, first using multipurpose disinfecting solution containing edetate disodium and sorbic acid (MPDS+EDSA), followed by soaking in multipurpose solution (MPS). The regimen demonstrated the greatest effect against the pre-formed biofilm and the adhesion activity of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa on the soft CLs. The SEM micrographs confirmed the morphological changes of bacterial biofilm after disinfecting and revealed that the two-step system treated CLs displayed less adherent bacteria. CONCLUSION: HEMA-based soft CLs may facilitate bacterial biofilm formation and adhesion capability. The two-step system was the most effective regimen for biofilm removal, where the soaking period in the disinfecting solution of the no-rub regimen should last more than 6 h to remove pre-formed biofilm. Dove 2021-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8197623/ /pubmed/34135567 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S310862 Text en © 2021 Mordmuang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mordmuang, Auemphon Udomwech, Lunla Karnjana, Kulwadee Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation |
title | Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation |
title_full | Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation |
title_fullStr | Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation |
title_short | Influence of Contact Lens Materials and Cleaning Procedures on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation |
title_sort | influence of contact lens materials and cleaning procedures on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34135567 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S310862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mordmuangauemphon influenceofcontactlensmaterialsandcleaningproceduresonbacterialadhesionandbiofilmformation AT udomwechlunla influenceofcontactlensmaterialsandcleaningproceduresonbacterialadhesionandbiofilmformation AT karnjanakulwadee influenceofcontactlensmaterialsandcleaningproceduresonbacterialadhesionandbiofilmformation |