Cargando…
Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder
Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of gemcitabine maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC). Materials and Methods Sixty patients with unresectable or metastatic GBC having ongoing response to treatment with initi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721216 |
_version_ | 1783706964379828224 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Manish Talwar, Vineet Maheshwari, Udip Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu Goel, Varun Goyal, Sumit Dash, Prasanta Kumar Batra, Ullas Bajaj, Rajat Yadav, Abhishek Goyal, Pankaj Doval, Dinesh Chandra |
author_facet | Sharma, Manish Talwar, Vineet Maheshwari, Udip Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu Goel, Varun Goyal, Sumit Dash, Prasanta Kumar Batra, Ullas Bajaj, Rajat Yadav, Abhishek Goyal, Pankaj Doval, Dinesh Chandra |
author_sort | Sharma, Manish |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of gemcitabine maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC). Materials and Methods Sixty patients with unresectable or metastatic GBC having ongoing response to treatment with initial six cycles of gemcitabine and a platinum-based doublet chemotherapy were prospectively randomized on day 21 of the 6th cycle in 1:1 fashion to receive either maintenance gemcitabine 1 g/m (2) intravenously on day 1 and day 8 of three weekly cycle or observation. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and comparisons by the log-rank test. A p -value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results Of 60 patients, a total of 56 were available for final analysis. The median PFS was 4.7 months (3.1–6.3) in gemcitabine arm and 2.6 months (2.4–2.8) in observation arm, hazard ratio (HR) 0.196 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1–0.39), p < 0.001. Median overall survival in gemcitabine arm was 12.4 months (9.15–15.6) as opposed to 9.9 months (8.29–11.5) in observation arm, HR 0.76 (95% CI: 0.43–1.35), p = 0.354. The grade 3 or 4 side effects in maintenance arm were transaminitis (17.9%), thrombocytopenia (17.8%), neutropenia (14.2%), and febrile neutropenia (7.1%). Conclusions Maintenance gemcitabine therapy in unresectable/metastatic GBC patients responding to first-line gemcitabine and platinum treatment contributes to increase PFS with minimal and manageable side effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8197654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81976542021-06-14 Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder Sharma, Manish Talwar, Vineet Maheshwari, Udip Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu Goel, Varun Goyal, Sumit Dash, Prasanta Kumar Batra, Ullas Bajaj, Rajat Yadav, Abhishek Goyal, Pankaj Doval, Dinesh Chandra South Asian J Cancer Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of gemcitabine maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC). Materials and Methods Sixty patients with unresectable or metastatic GBC having ongoing response to treatment with initial six cycles of gemcitabine and a platinum-based doublet chemotherapy were prospectively randomized on day 21 of the 6th cycle in 1:1 fashion to receive either maintenance gemcitabine 1 g/m (2) intravenously on day 1 and day 8 of three weekly cycle or observation. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and comparisons by the log-rank test. A p -value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results Of 60 patients, a total of 56 were available for final analysis. The median PFS was 4.7 months (3.1–6.3) in gemcitabine arm and 2.6 months (2.4–2.8) in observation arm, hazard ratio (HR) 0.196 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1–0.39), p < 0.001. Median overall survival in gemcitabine arm was 12.4 months (9.15–15.6) as opposed to 9.9 months (8.29–11.5) in observation arm, HR 0.76 (95% CI: 0.43–1.35), p = 0.354. The grade 3 or 4 side effects in maintenance arm were transaminitis (17.9%), thrombocytopenia (17.8%), neutropenia (14.2%), and febrile neutropenia (7.1%). Conclusions Maintenance gemcitabine therapy in unresectable/metastatic GBC patients responding to first-line gemcitabine and platinum treatment contributes to increase PFS with minimal and manageable side effects. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 2020-10 2021-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8197654/ /pubmed/34131572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721216 Text en MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sharma, Manish Talwar, Vineet Maheshwari, Udip Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu Goel, Varun Goyal, Sumit Dash, Prasanta Kumar Batra, Ullas Bajaj, Rajat Yadav, Abhishek Goyal, Pankaj Doval, Dinesh Chandra Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder |
title | Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder |
title_full | Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder |
title_fullStr | Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder |
title_short | Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder |
title_sort | role of maintenance gemcitabine in advanced carcinoma gallbladder |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmamanish roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT talwarvineet roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT maheshwariudip roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT koyyalavenkatapradeepbabu roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT goelvarun roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT goyalsumit roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT dashprasantakumar roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT batraullas roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT bajajrajat roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT yadavabhishek roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT goyalpankaj roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder AT dovaldineshchandra roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder |