Cargando…

Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder

Objective  The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of gemcitabine maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC). Materials and Methods  Sixty patients with unresectable or metastatic GBC having ongoing response to treatment with initi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Manish, Talwar, Vineet, Maheshwari, Udip, Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu, Goel, Varun, Goyal, Sumit, Dash, Prasanta Kumar, Batra, Ullas, Bajaj, Rajat, Yadav, Abhishek, Goyal, Pankaj, Doval, Dinesh Chandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721216
_version_ 1783706964379828224
author Sharma, Manish
Talwar, Vineet
Maheshwari, Udip
Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu
Goel, Varun
Goyal, Sumit
Dash, Prasanta Kumar
Batra, Ullas
Bajaj, Rajat
Yadav, Abhishek
Goyal, Pankaj
Doval, Dinesh Chandra
author_facet Sharma, Manish
Talwar, Vineet
Maheshwari, Udip
Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu
Goel, Varun
Goyal, Sumit
Dash, Prasanta Kumar
Batra, Ullas
Bajaj, Rajat
Yadav, Abhishek
Goyal, Pankaj
Doval, Dinesh Chandra
author_sort Sharma, Manish
collection PubMed
description Objective  The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of gemcitabine maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC). Materials and Methods  Sixty patients with unresectable or metastatic GBC having ongoing response to treatment with initial six cycles of gemcitabine and a platinum-based doublet chemotherapy were prospectively randomized on day 21 of the 6th cycle in 1:1 fashion to receive either maintenance gemcitabine 1 g/m (2) intravenously on day 1 and day 8 of three weekly cycle or observation. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and comparisons by the log-rank test. A p -value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results  Of 60 patients, a total of 56 were available for final analysis. The median PFS was 4.7 months (3.1–6.3) in gemcitabine arm and 2.6 months (2.4–2.8) in observation arm, hazard ratio (HR) 0.196 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1–0.39), p < 0.001. Median overall survival in gemcitabine arm was 12.4 months (9.15–15.6) as opposed to 9.9 months (8.29–11.5) in observation arm, HR 0.76 (95% CI: 0.43–1.35), p = 0.354. The grade 3 or 4 side effects in maintenance arm were transaminitis (17.9%), thrombocytopenia (17.8%), neutropenia (14.2%), and febrile neutropenia (7.1%). Conclusions  Maintenance gemcitabine therapy in unresectable/metastatic GBC patients responding to first-line gemcitabine and platinum treatment contributes to increase PFS with minimal and manageable side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8197654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81976542021-06-14 Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder Sharma, Manish Talwar, Vineet Maheshwari, Udip Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu Goel, Varun Goyal, Sumit Dash, Prasanta Kumar Batra, Ullas Bajaj, Rajat Yadav, Abhishek Goyal, Pankaj Doval, Dinesh Chandra South Asian J Cancer Objective  The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of gemcitabine maintenance on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC). Materials and Methods  Sixty patients with unresectable or metastatic GBC having ongoing response to treatment with initial six cycles of gemcitabine and a platinum-based doublet chemotherapy were prospectively randomized on day 21 of the 6th cycle in 1:1 fashion to receive either maintenance gemcitabine 1 g/m (2) intravenously on day 1 and day 8 of three weekly cycle or observation. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and comparisons by the log-rank test. A p -value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results  Of 60 patients, a total of 56 were available for final analysis. The median PFS was 4.7 months (3.1–6.3) in gemcitabine arm and 2.6 months (2.4–2.8) in observation arm, hazard ratio (HR) 0.196 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1–0.39), p < 0.001. Median overall survival in gemcitabine arm was 12.4 months (9.15–15.6) as opposed to 9.9 months (8.29–11.5) in observation arm, HR 0.76 (95% CI: 0.43–1.35), p = 0.354. The grade 3 or 4 side effects in maintenance arm were transaminitis (17.9%), thrombocytopenia (17.8%), neutropenia (14.2%), and febrile neutropenia (7.1%). Conclusions  Maintenance gemcitabine therapy in unresectable/metastatic GBC patients responding to first-line gemcitabine and platinum treatment contributes to increase PFS with minimal and manageable side effects. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 2020-10 2021-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8197654/ /pubmed/34131572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721216 Text en MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Sharma, Manish
Talwar, Vineet
Maheshwari, Udip
Koyyala, Venkata Pradeep Babu
Goel, Varun
Goyal, Sumit
Dash, Prasanta Kumar
Batra, Ullas
Bajaj, Rajat
Yadav, Abhishek
Goyal, Pankaj
Doval, Dinesh Chandra
Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder
title Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder
title_full Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder
title_fullStr Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder
title_full_unstemmed Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder
title_short Role of Maintenance Gemcitabine in Advanced Carcinoma Gallbladder
title_sort role of maintenance gemcitabine in advanced carcinoma gallbladder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34131572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721216
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmamanish roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT talwarvineet roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT maheshwariudip roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT koyyalavenkatapradeepbabu roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT goelvarun roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT goyalsumit roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT dashprasantakumar roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT batraullas roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT bajajrajat roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT yadavabhishek roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT goyalpankaj roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder
AT dovaldineshchandra roleofmaintenancegemcitabineinadvancedcarcinomagallbladder