Cargando…

Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and Wear of Polymeric Materials for Orthodontic Applications

Background: Clinical success depends on the contact strength and wear resistance of medical devices made of polymer materials. The scientific goal resulted from the problem of using different methods of surface evaluation of materials used in the production of orthodontic appliances. The purpose of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domagała, Ivo, Przystupa, Krzysztof, Firlej, Marcel, Pieniak, Daniel, Gil, Leszek, Borucka, Anna, Naworol, Ireneusz, Biedziak, Barbara, Levkiv, Mariana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112925
_version_ 1783706989321256960
author Domagała, Ivo
Przystupa, Krzysztof
Firlej, Marcel
Pieniak, Daniel
Gil, Leszek
Borucka, Anna
Naworol, Ireneusz
Biedziak, Barbara
Levkiv, Mariana
author_facet Domagała, Ivo
Przystupa, Krzysztof
Firlej, Marcel
Pieniak, Daniel
Gil, Leszek
Borucka, Anna
Naworol, Ireneusz
Biedziak, Barbara
Levkiv, Mariana
author_sort Domagała, Ivo
collection PubMed
description Background: Clinical success depends on the contact strength and wear resistance of medical devices made of polymer materials. The scientific goal resulted from the problem of using different methods of surface evaluation of materials used in the production of orthodontic appliances. The purpose of the work was an experimental comparative assessment of indentation hardness and scratch hardness and the sliding wear of four selected polymeric materials used in the manufacture of orthodontic appliances. Methods: Four commercial materials were compared. Shore hardness tests and a scratch test with a Rockwell indenter were performed. A sliding wear test was performed using the ball-on-disc method. Statistical PCA and correlation analyses were performed. Results: The results of scratch hardness measurements using a contact profilometer correlated with the Shore hardness to a greater extent than measurements made using an optical microscope. PCA showed that Shore hardness explains 45% of the total variance in all the results across the materials. Conclusions: The scratch hardness method allows for a more explicit ranking of orthodontic polymeric materials when measurements are made with a profilometer. The ranking of sliding wear resistance should be made separately.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8197806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81978062021-06-14 Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and Wear of Polymeric Materials for Orthodontic Applications Domagała, Ivo Przystupa, Krzysztof Firlej, Marcel Pieniak, Daniel Gil, Leszek Borucka, Anna Naworol, Ireneusz Biedziak, Barbara Levkiv, Mariana Materials (Basel) Article Background: Clinical success depends on the contact strength and wear resistance of medical devices made of polymer materials. The scientific goal resulted from the problem of using different methods of surface evaluation of materials used in the production of orthodontic appliances. The purpose of the work was an experimental comparative assessment of indentation hardness and scratch hardness and the sliding wear of four selected polymeric materials used in the manufacture of orthodontic appliances. Methods: Four commercial materials were compared. Shore hardness tests and a scratch test with a Rockwell indenter were performed. A sliding wear test was performed using the ball-on-disc method. Statistical PCA and correlation analyses were performed. Results: The results of scratch hardness measurements using a contact profilometer correlated with the Shore hardness to a greater extent than measurements made using an optical microscope. PCA showed that Shore hardness explains 45% of the total variance in all the results across the materials. Conclusions: The scratch hardness method allows for a more explicit ranking of orthodontic polymeric materials when measurements are made with a profilometer. The ranking of sliding wear resistance should be made separately. MDPI 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8197806/ /pubmed/34071606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112925 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Domagała, Ivo
Przystupa, Krzysztof
Firlej, Marcel
Pieniak, Daniel
Gil, Leszek
Borucka, Anna
Naworol, Ireneusz
Biedziak, Barbara
Levkiv, Mariana
Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and Wear of Polymeric Materials for Orthodontic Applications
title Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and Wear of Polymeric Materials for Orthodontic Applications
title_full Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and Wear of Polymeric Materials for Orthodontic Applications
title_fullStr Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and Wear of Polymeric Materials for Orthodontic Applications
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and Wear of Polymeric Materials for Orthodontic Applications
title_short Analysis of the Statistical Comparability of the Hardness and Wear of Polymeric Materials for Orthodontic Applications
title_sort analysis of the statistical comparability of the hardness and wear of polymeric materials for orthodontic applications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112925
work_keys_str_mv AT domagałaivo analysisofthestatisticalcomparabilityofthehardnessandwearofpolymericmaterialsfororthodonticapplications
AT przystupakrzysztof analysisofthestatisticalcomparabilityofthehardnessandwearofpolymericmaterialsfororthodonticapplications
AT firlejmarcel analysisofthestatisticalcomparabilityofthehardnessandwearofpolymericmaterialsfororthodonticapplications
AT pieniakdaniel analysisofthestatisticalcomparabilityofthehardnessandwearofpolymericmaterialsfororthodonticapplications
AT gilleszek analysisofthestatisticalcomparabilityofthehardnessandwearofpolymericmaterialsfororthodonticapplications
AT boruckaanna analysisofthestatisticalcomparabilityofthehardnessandwearofpolymericmaterialsfororthodonticapplications
AT naworolireneusz analysisofthestatisticalcomparabilityofthehardnessandwearofpolymericmaterialsfororthodonticapplications
AT biedziakbarbara analysisofthestatisticalcomparabilityofthehardnessandwearofpolymericmaterialsfororthodonticapplications
AT levkivmariana analysisofthestatisticalcomparabilityofthehardnessandwearofpolymericmaterialsfororthodonticapplications