Cargando…
A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Extent of Denosumab (Xgeva(®)) Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe side effect of antiresorptive medication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and to compare the clinical and radiological extent of osteonecrosis. A retrospective study of p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112390 |
_version_ | 1783706991410020352 |
---|---|
author | Assili, Zineb Dolivet, Gilles Salleron, Julia Griffaton-Tallandier, Claire Egloff-Juras, Claire Phulpin, Bérengère |
author_facet | Assili, Zineb Dolivet, Gilles Salleron, Julia Griffaton-Tallandier, Claire Egloff-Juras, Claire Phulpin, Bérengère |
author_sort | Assili, Zineb |
collection | PubMed |
description | Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe side effect of antiresorptive medication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and to compare the clinical and radiological extent of osteonecrosis. A retrospective study of patients who received Xgeva(®) at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine (ICL) was performed. Patients for whom clinical and radiological (CBCT) data were available were divided into two groups: “exposed” for patients with bone exposure and “fistula” when only a fistula through which the bone could be probed was observed. The difference between clinical and radiological extent was assessed. The p-value was set at 0.05, and a total of 246 patients were included. The cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis was 0.9% at 6 months, 7% at 12 months, and 15% from 24 months. The clinical extent of MRONJ was significantly less than their radiological extent: in the “exposed” group, 17 areas (45%) were less extensive clinically than radiologically (p < 0.001) and respectively 6 (67%) for the “fistula” group (p < 0.031). It would seem that a CBCT is essential to know the real extent of MRONJ. Thus, it would seem interesting to systematically perform a CBCT during the diagnosis of MRONJ, exploring the entire affected dental arch. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8197814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81978142021-06-14 A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Extent of Denosumab (Xgeva(®)) Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study Assili, Zineb Dolivet, Gilles Salleron, Julia Griffaton-Tallandier, Claire Egloff-Juras, Claire Phulpin, Bérengère J Clin Med Article Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe side effect of antiresorptive medication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and to compare the clinical and radiological extent of osteonecrosis. A retrospective study of patients who received Xgeva(®) at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine (ICL) was performed. Patients for whom clinical and radiological (CBCT) data were available were divided into two groups: “exposed” for patients with bone exposure and “fistula” when only a fistula through which the bone could be probed was observed. The difference between clinical and radiological extent was assessed. The p-value was set at 0.05, and a total of 246 patients were included. The cumulative incidence of osteonecrosis was 0.9% at 6 months, 7% at 12 months, and 15% from 24 months. The clinical extent of MRONJ was significantly less than their radiological extent: in the “exposed” group, 17 areas (45%) were less extensive clinically than radiologically (p < 0.001) and respectively 6 (67%) for the “fistula” group (p < 0.031). It would seem that a CBCT is essential to know the real extent of MRONJ. Thus, it would seem interesting to systematically perform a CBCT during the diagnosis of MRONJ, exploring the entire affected dental arch. MDPI 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8197814/ /pubmed/34071481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112390 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Assili, Zineb Dolivet, Gilles Salleron, Julia Griffaton-Tallandier, Claire Egloff-Juras, Claire Phulpin, Bérengère A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Extent of Denosumab (Xgeva(®)) Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study |
title | A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Extent of Denosumab (Xgeva(®)) Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Extent of Denosumab (Xgeva(®)) Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Extent of Denosumab (Xgeva(®)) Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Extent of Denosumab (Xgeva(®)) Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiological Extent of Denosumab (Xgeva(®)) Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | comparison of the clinical and radiological extent of denosumab (xgeva(®)) related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a retrospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112390 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT assilizineb acomparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT dolivetgilles acomparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT salleronjulia acomparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT griffatontallandierclaire acomparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT egloffjurasclaire acomparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT phulpinberengere acomparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT assilizineb comparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT dolivetgilles comparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT salleronjulia comparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT griffatontallandierclaire comparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT egloffjurasclaire comparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy AT phulpinberengere comparisonoftheclinicalandradiologicalextentofdenosumabxgevarelatedosteonecrosisofthejawaretrospectivestudy |