Cargando…
Development of the sympathetic trunks in human embryos
Although the development of the sympathetic trunks was first described >100 years ago, the topographic aspect of their development has received relatively little attention. We visualised the sympathetic trunks in human embryos of 4.5–10 weeks post‐fertilisation, using Amira 3D‐reconstruction and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33641166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13415 |
_version_ | 1783707023528951808 |
---|---|
author | Kruepunga, Nutmethee Hikspoors, Jill P. J. M. Hülsman, Cindy J. M. Mommen, Greet M. C. Köhler, S. Eleonore Lamers, Wouter H. |
author_facet | Kruepunga, Nutmethee Hikspoors, Jill P. J. M. Hülsman, Cindy J. M. Mommen, Greet M. C. Köhler, S. Eleonore Lamers, Wouter H. |
author_sort | Kruepunga, Nutmethee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the development of the sympathetic trunks was first described >100 years ago, the topographic aspect of their development has received relatively little attention. We visualised the sympathetic trunks in human embryos of 4.5–10 weeks post‐fertilisation, using Amira 3D‐reconstruction and Cinema 4D‐remodelling software. Scattered, intensely staining neural crest‐derived ganglionic cells that soon formed longitudinal columns were first seen laterally to the dorsal aorta in the cervical and upper thoracic regions of Carnegie stage (CS)14 embryos. Nerve fibres extending from the communicating branches with the spinal cord reached the trunks at CS15‐16 and became incorporated randomly between ganglionic cells. After CS18, ganglionic cells became organised as irregular agglomerates (ganglia) on a craniocaudally continuous cord of nerve fibres, with dorsally more ganglionic cells and ventrally more fibres. Accordingly, the trunks assumed a “pearls‐on‐a‐string” appearance, but size and distribution of the pearls were markedly heterogeneous. The change in position of the sympathetic trunks from lateral (para‐aortic) to dorsolateral (prevertebral or paravertebral) is a criterion to distinguish the “primary” and “secondary” sympathetic trunks. We investigated the position of the trunks at vertebral levels T2, T7, L1 and S1. During CS14, the trunks occupied a para‐aortic position, which changed into a prevertebral position in the cervical and upper thoracic regions during CS15, and in the lower thoracic and lumbar regions during CS18 and CS20, respectively. The thoracic sympathetic trunks continued to move further dorsally and attained a paravertebral position at CS23. The sacral trunks retained their para‐aortic and prevertebral position, and converged into a single column in front of the coccyx. Based on our present and earlier morphometric measurements and literature data, we argue that differential growth accounts for the regional differences in position of the sympathetic trunks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8197954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81979542021-06-15 Development of the sympathetic trunks in human embryos Kruepunga, Nutmethee Hikspoors, Jill P. J. M. Hülsman, Cindy J. M. Mommen, Greet M. C. Köhler, S. Eleonore Lamers, Wouter H. J Anat Original Papers Although the development of the sympathetic trunks was first described >100 years ago, the topographic aspect of their development has received relatively little attention. We visualised the sympathetic trunks in human embryos of 4.5–10 weeks post‐fertilisation, using Amira 3D‐reconstruction and Cinema 4D‐remodelling software. Scattered, intensely staining neural crest‐derived ganglionic cells that soon formed longitudinal columns were first seen laterally to the dorsal aorta in the cervical and upper thoracic regions of Carnegie stage (CS)14 embryos. Nerve fibres extending from the communicating branches with the spinal cord reached the trunks at CS15‐16 and became incorporated randomly between ganglionic cells. After CS18, ganglionic cells became organised as irregular agglomerates (ganglia) on a craniocaudally continuous cord of nerve fibres, with dorsally more ganglionic cells and ventrally more fibres. Accordingly, the trunks assumed a “pearls‐on‐a‐string” appearance, but size and distribution of the pearls were markedly heterogeneous. The change in position of the sympathetic trunks from lateral (para‐aortic) to dorsolateral (prevertebral or paravertebral) is a criterion to distinguish the “primary” and “secondary” sympathetic trunks. We investigated the position of the trunks at vertebral levels T2, T7, L1 and S1. During CS14, the trunks occupied a para‐aortic position, which changed into a prevertebral position in the cervical and upper thoracic regions during CS15, and in the lower thoracic and lumbar regions during CS18 and CS20, respectively. The thoracic sympathetic trunks continued to move further dorsally and attained a paravertebral position at CS23. The sacral trunks retained their para‐aortic and prevertebral position, and converged into a single column in front of the coccyx. Based on our present and earlier morphometric measurements and literature data, we argue that differential growth accounts for the regional differences in position of the sympathetic trunks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-27 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8197954/ /pubmed/33641166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13415 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Anatomical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Kruepunga, Nutmethee Hikspoors, Jill P. J. M. Hülsman, Cindy J. M. Mommen, Greet M. C. Köhler, S. Eleonore Lamers, Wouter H. Development of the sympathetic trunks in human embryos |
title | Development of the sympathetic trunks in human embryos |
title_full | Development of the sympathetic trunks in human embryos |
title_fullStr | Development of the sympathetic trunks in human embryos |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of the sympathetic trunks in human embryos |
title_short | Development of the sympathetic trunks in human embryos |
title_sort | development of the sympathetic trunks in human embryos |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8197954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33641166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joa.13415 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kruepunganutmethee developmentofthesympathetictrunksinhumanembryos AT hikspoorsjillpjm developmentofthesympathetictrunksinhumanembryos AT hulsmancindyjm developmentofthesympathetictrunksinhumanembryos AT mommengreetmc developmentofthesympathetictrunksinhumanembryos AT kohlerseleonore developmentofthesympathetictrunksinhumanembryos AT lamerswouterh developmentofthesympathetictrunksinhumanembryos |