Cargando…

Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review

Background: Dental components manufactured with zirconia (ZrO(2)) represent a significant percentage of the implant prosthetic market in dentistry. However, during the last few years, we have observed robust clinical and pre-clinical scientific investigations on zirconia both as a prosthetic and an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kunrath, Marcel F., Gupta, Saurabh, Lorusso, Felice, Scarano, Antonio, Noumbissi, Sammy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34070589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112825
_version_ 1783707074402713600
author Kunrath, Marcel F.
Gupta, Saurabh
Lorusso, Felice
Scarano, Antonio
Noumbissi, Sammy
author_facet Kunrath, Marcel F.
Gupta, Saurabh
Lorusso, Felice
Scarano, Antonio
Noumbissi, Sammy
author_sort Kunrath, Marcel F.
collection PubMed
description Background: Dental components manufactured with zirconia (ZrO(2)) represent a significant percentage of the implant prosthetic market in dentistry. However, during the last few years, we have observed robust clinical and pre-clinical scientific investigations on zirconia both as a prosthetic and an implantable material. At the same time, we have witnessed consistent technical and manufacturing updates with regards to the applications of zirconia which appear to gradually clarify points which until recently were not well understood. Methods: This critical review evaluated the “state of the art” in relation to applications of this biomaterial in dental components and its interactions with oral tissues. Results: The physico-chemical and structural properties as well as the current surface treatment methodologies for ZrO(2) were explored. A critical investigation of the cellular response to this biomaterial was completed and the clinical implications discussed. Finally, surface treatments of ZrO(2) demonstrate that excellent osseointegration is possible and provide encouraging prospects for rapid bone adhesion. Furthermore, sophisticated surface treatment techniques and technologies are providing impressive oral soft tissue cell responses thus leading to superior biological seal. Conclusions: Dental devices manufactured from ZrO(2) are structurally and chemically stable with biocompatibility levels allowing for safe and long-term function in the oral environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8198172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81981722021-06-14 Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review Kunrath, Marcel F. Gupta, Saurabh Lorusso, Felice Scarano, Antonio Noumbissi, Sammy Materials (Basel) Review Background: Dental components manufactured with zirconia (ZrO(2)) represent a significant percentage of the implant prosthetic market in dentistry. However, during the last few years, we have observed robust clinical and pre-clinical scientific investigations on zirconia both as a prosthetic and an implantable material. At the same time, we have witnessed consistent technical and manufacturing updates with regards to the applications of zirconia which appear to gradually clarify points which until recently were not well understood. Methods: This critical review evaluated the “state of the art” in relation to applications of this biomaterial in dental components and its interactions with oral tissues. Results: The physico-chemical and structural properties as well as the current surface treatment methodologies for ZrO(2) were explored. A critical investigation of the cellular response to this biomaterial was completed and the clinical implications discussed. Finally, surface treatments of ZrO(2) demonstrate that excellent osseointegration is possible and provide encouraging prospects for rapid bone adhesion. Furthermore, sophisticated surface treatment techniques and technologies are providing impressive oral soft tissue cell responses thus leading to superior biological seal. Conclusions: Dental devices manufactured from ZrO(2) are structurally and chemically stable with biocompatibility levels allowing for safe and long-term function in the oral environment. MDPI 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8198172/ /pubmed/34070589 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112825 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kunrath, Marcel F.
Gupta, Saurabh
Lorusso, Felice
Scarano, Antonio
Noumbissi, Sammy
Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review
title Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review
title_full Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review
title_short Oral Tissue Interactions and Cellular Response to Zirconia Implant-Prosthetic Components: A Critical Review
title_sort oral tissue interactions and cellular response to zirconia implant-prosthetic components: a critical review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34070589
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14112825
work_keys_str_mv AT kunrathmarcelf oraltissueinteractionsandcellularresponsetozirconiaimplantprostheticcomponentsacriticalreview
AT guptasaurabh oraltissueinteractionsandcellularresponsetozirconiaimplantprostheticcomponentsacriticalreview
AT lorussofelice oraltissueinteractionsandcellularresponsetozirconiaimplantprostheticcomponentsacriticalreview
AT scaranoantonio oraltissueinteractionsandcellularresponsetozirconiaimplantprostheticcomponentsacriticalreview
AT noumbissisammy oraltissueinteractionsandcellularresponsetozirconiaimplantprostheticcomponentsacriticalreview