Cargando…

Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The treatments for patients with oligometastatic colorectal carcinoma are rapidly evolving. The present review focuses on the role of minimally invasive techniques since they can now be used as an alternative to surgical management in selected cases in association with systemic thera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mauri, Giovanni, Monfardini, Lorenzo, Garnero, Andrea, Zampino, Maria Giulia, Orsi, Franco, Della Vigna, Paolo, Bonomo, Guido, Varano, Gianluca Maria, Busso, Marco, Gazzera, Carlo, Fonio, Paolo, Veltri, Andrea, Calandri, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073585
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112617
_version_ 1783707104231555072
author Mauri, Giovanni
Monfardini, Lorenzo
Garnero, Andrea
Zampino, Maria Giulia
Orsi, Franco
Della Vigna, Paolo
Bonomo, Guido
Varano, Gianluca Maria
Busso, Marco
Gazzera, Carlo
Fonio, Paolo
Veltri, Andrea
Calandri, Marco
author_facet Mauri, Giovanni
Monfardini, Lorenzo
Garnero, Andrea
Zampino, Maria Giulia
Orsi, Franco
Della Vigna, Paolo
Bonomo, Guido
Varano, Gianluca Maria
Busso, Marco
Gazzera, Carlo
Fonio, Paolo
Veltri, Andrea
Calandri, Marco
author_sort Mauri, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The treatments for patients with oligometastatic colorectal carcinoma are rapidly evolving. The present review focuses on the role of minimally invasive techniques since they can now be used as an alternative to surgical management in selected cases in association with systemic therapies according to ESMO and NCCN guidelines. In recent years, biomarkers (both at molecular and imaging level) have emerged as a relevant and potential criteria for treatment strategy decision and will be crucial in the future for patients selection. Tumor molecular profile impacts on local outcome of image guide ablation as well as metabolic imaging which predicts the outcome of both percutaneous and trans-arterial treatments. Oncologists should be aware of advantages and disadvantages of those treatments options as well as the potential role of molecular profile for a better patient selection. ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and has a high rate of metastatic disease which is the main cause of CRC-related death. Oligometastatic disease is a clinical condition recently included in ESMO guidelines that can benefit from a more aggressive locoregional approach. This review focuses the attention on colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and highlights recommendations and therapeutic locoregional strategies drawn from the current literature and consensus conferences. The different percutaneous therapies (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation) as well as trans-arterial approaches (chemoembolization and radioembolization) are discussed. Ablation margins, the choice of the imaging guidance as well as characteristics of the different ablation techniques and other technical aspects are analyzed. A specific attention is then paid to the increasing role of biomarkers (in particular molecular profiling) and their role in the selection of the proper treatment for the right patient. In conclusion, in this review an up-to-date state of the art of the application of locoregional treatments on CRLM is provided, highlighting both technical aspects and the role of biomarkers, two sides of the same coin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8198296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81982962021-06-14 Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin Mauri, Giovanni Monfardini, Lorenzo Garnero, Andrea Zampino, Maria Giulia Orsi, Franco Della Vigna, Paolo Bonomo, Guido Varano, Gianluca Maria Busso, Marco Gazzera, Carlo Fonio, Paolo Veltri, Andrea Calandri, Marco Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The treatments for patients with oligometastatic colorectal carcinoma are rapidly evolving. The present review focuses on the role of minimally invasive techniques since they can now be used as an alternative to surgical management in selected cases in association with systemic therapies according to ESMO and NCCN guidelines. In recent years, biomarkers (both at molecular and imaging level) have emerged as a relevant and potential criteria for treatment strategy decision and will be crucial in the future for patients selection. Tumor molecular profile impacts on local outcome of image guide ablation as well as metabolic imaging which predicts the outcome of both percutaneous and trans-arterial treatments. Oncologists should be aware of advantages and disadvantages of those treatments options as well as the potential role of molecular profile for a better patient selection. ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and has a high rate of metastatic disease which is the main cause of CRC-related death. Oligometastatic disease is a clinical condition recently included in ESMO guidelines that can benefit from a more aggressive locoregional approach. This review focuses the attention on colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and highlights recommendations and therapeutic locoregional strategies drawn from the current literature and consensus conferences. The different percutaneous therapies (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, irreversible electroporation) as well as trans-arterial approaches (chemoembolization and radioembolization) are discussed. Ablation margins, the choice of the imaging guidance as well as characteristics of the different ablation techniques and other technical aspects are analyzed. A specific attention is then paid to the increasing role of biomarkers (in particular molecular profiling) and their role in the selection of the proper treatment for the right patient. In conclusion, in this review an up-to-date state of the art of the application of locoregional treatments on CRLM is provided, highlighting both technical aspects and the role of biomarkers, two sides of the same coin. MDPI 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8198296/ /pubmed/34073585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112617 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mauri, Giovanni
Monfardini, Lorenzo
Garnero, Andrea
Zampino, Maria Giulia
Orsi, Franco
Della Vigna, Paolo
Bonomo, Guido
Varano, Gianluca Maria
Busso, Marco
Gazzera, Carlo
Fonio, Paolo
Veltri, Andrea
Calandri, Marco
Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin
title Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin
title_full Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin
title_fullStr Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin
title_short Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin
title_sort optimizing loco regional management of oligometastatic colorectal cancer: technical aspects and biomarkers, two sides of the same coin
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073585
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112617
work_keys_str_mv AT maurigiovanni optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT monfardinilorenzo optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT garneroandrea optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT zampinomariagiulia optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT orsifranco optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT dellavignapaolo optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT bonomoguido optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT varanogianlucamaria optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT bussomarco optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT gazzeracarlo optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT foniopaolo optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT veltriandrea optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin
AT calandrimarco optimizinglocoregionalmanagementofoligometastaticcolorectalcancertechnicalaspectsandbiomarkerstwosidesofthesamecoin