Cargando…

Resection Margins in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: An Update of Residual Disease and Field Cancerization

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Curative treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is largely dependent on locoregional control of the disease. However, HNSCCs frequently recur, and even after surgery with histologically tumor-free surgical margins, tumors may relapse in approximately 10–30% of pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pierik, Annouk S., Leemans, C. René, Brakenhoff, Ruud H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112635
_version_ 1783707107358408704
author Pierik, Annouk S.
Leemans, C. René
Brakenhoff, Ruud H.
author_facet Pierik, Annouk S.
Leemans, C. René
Brakenhoff, Ruud H.
author_sort Pierik, Annouk S.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Curative treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is largely dependent on locoregional control of the disease. However, HNSCCs frequently recur, and even after surgery with histologically tumor-free surgical margins, tumors may relapse in approximately 10–30% of patients. The development of local relapse despite the fact that surgical margins were tumor-free relates to two independent pathobiological mechanisms: minimal residual disease and field cancerization. Here, we outline the cellular and biological background of local relapse that resulted in a most recently reported clinical trial. We further discuss directions that may improve treatment results in the future. ABSTRACT: Surgery is one of the mainstays of head and neck cancer treatment, and aims at radical resection of the tumor with 1 cm tumor-free margins to obtain locoregional control. Surgical margins are evaluated by histopathological examination of the resection specimen. It has been long an enigma that approximately 10–30% of surgically treated head and neck cancer patients develop locoregional recurrences even though the resection margins were microscopically tumor-free. However, the origins of these recurrences have been elucidated by a variety of molecular studies. Recurrences arise either from minimal residual disease, cancer cells in the surgical margins that escape detection by the pathologist when examining the specimen, or from precancerous mucosal changes that may remain unnoticed. Head and neck tumors develop in mucosal precursor changes that are sometimes visible but mostly not, fueling research into imaging modalities such as autofluorescence, to improve visualization. Mostly unnoticed, these precancerous changes may stay behind when the tumor is resected, and subsequent malignant progression will cause a local relapse. This led to a clinical trial of autofluorescence-guided surgery, of which the results were reported in 2020. This review focuses on the most recent literature of the improved diagnosis of the resection margins of surgically treated head and neck cancer patients, the pathobiological origin of recurrent disease, and relevant biomarkers to predict local relapse. Directions for further research will be discussed, including potential options for improved and personalized treatment, based on the most recently published data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8198309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81983092021-06-14 Resection Margins in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: An Update of Residual Disease and Field Cancerization Pierik, Annouk S. Leemans, C. René Brakenhoff, Ruud H. Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Curative treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is largely dependent on locoregional control of the disease. However, HNSCCs frequently recur, and even after surgery with histologically tumor-free surgical margins, tumors may relapse in approximately 10–30% of patients. The development of local relapse despite the fact that surgical margins were tumor-free relates to two independent pathobiological mechanisms: minimal residual disease and field cancerization. Here, we outline the cellular and biological background of local relapse that resulted in a most recently reported clinical trial. We further discuss directions that may improve treatment results in the future. ABSTRACT: Surgery is one of the mainstays of head and neck cancer treatment, and aims at radical resection of the tumor with 1 cm tumor-free margins to obtain locoregional control. Surgical margins are evaluated by histopathological examination of the resection specimen. It has been long an enigma that approximately 10–30% of surgically treated head and neck cancer patients develop locoregional recurrences even though the resection margins were microscopically tumor-free. However, the origins of these recurrences have been elucidated by a variety of molecular studies. Recurrences arise either from minimal residual disease, cancer cells in the surgical margins that escape detection by the pathologist when examining the specimen, or from precancerous mucosal changes that may remain unnoticed. Head and neck tumors develop in mucosal precursor changes that are sometimes visible but mostly not, fueling research into imaging modalities such as autofluorescence, to improve visualization. Mostly unnoticed, these precancerous changes may stay behind when the tumor is resected, and subsequent malignant progression will cause a local relapse. This led to a clinical trial of autofluorescence-guided surgery, of which the results were reported in 2020. This review focuses on the most recent literature of the improved diagnosis of the resection margins of surgically treated head and neck cancer patients, the pathobiological origin of recurrent disease, and relevant biomarkers to predict local relapse. Directions for further research will be discussed, including potential options for improved and personalized treatment, based on the most recently published data. MDPI 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8198309/ /pubmed/34071997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112635 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pierik, Annouk S.
Leemans, C. René
Brakenhoff, Ruud H.
Resection Margins in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: An Update of Residual Disease and Field Cancerization
title Resection Margins in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: An Update of Residual Disease and Field Cancerization
title_full Resection Margins in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: An Update of Residual Disease and Field Cancerization
title_fullStr Resection Margins in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: An Update of Residual Disease and Field Cancerization
title_full_unstemmed Resection Margins in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: An Update of Residual Disease and Field Cancerization
title_short Resection Margins in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: An Update of Residual Disease and Field Cancerization
title_sort resection margins in head and neck cancer surgery: an update of residual disease and field cancerization
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112635
work_keys_str_mv AT pierikannouks resectionmarginsinheadandneckcancersurgeryanupdateofresidualdiseaseandfieldcancerization
AT leemanscrene resectionmarginsinheadandneckcancersurgeryanupdateofresidualdiseaseandfieldcancerization
AT brakenhoffruudh resectionmarginsinheadandneckcancersurgeryanupdateofresidualdiseaseandfieldcancerization