Cargando…

Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations

Cochlear implants (CIs) recover hearing in severely to profoundly hearing-impaired people by electrically stimulating the cochlea. While they are extremely effective, spatial hearing is typically severely limited. Recent studies have shown that haptic stimulation can supplement the electrical CI sig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fletcher, Mark D., Zgheib, Jana, Perry, Samuel W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071729
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21113770
_version_ 1783707132809445376
author Fletcher, Mark D.
Zgheib, Jana
Perry, Samuel W.
author_facet Fletcher, Mark D.
Zgheib, Jana
Perry, Samuel W.
author_sort Fletcher, Mark D.
collection PubMed
description Cochlear implants (CIs) recover hearing in severely to profoundly hearing-impaired people by electrically stimulating the cochlea. While they are extremely effective, spatial hearing is typically severely limited. Recent studies have shown that haptic stimulation can supplement the electrical CI signal (electro-haptic stimulation) and substantially improve sound localization. In haptic sound-localization studies, the signal is extracted from the audio received by behind-the-ear devices and delivered to each wrist. Localization is achieved using tactile intensity differences (TIDs) across the wrists, which match sound intensity differences across the ears (a key sound localization cue). The current study established sensitivity to across-limb TIDs at three candidate locations for a wearable haptic device, namely: the lower tricep and the palmar and dorsal wrist. At all locations, TID sensitivity was similar to the sensitivity to across-ear intensity differences for normal-hearing listeners. This suggests that greater haptic sound-localization accuracy than previously shown can be achieved. The dynamic range was also measured and far exceeded that available through electrical CI stimulation for all of the locations, suggesting that haptic stimulation could provide additional sound-intensity information. These results indicate that an effective haptic aid could be deployed for any of the candidate locations, and could offer a low-cost, non-invasive means of improving outcomes for hearing-impaired listeners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8198414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81984142021-06-14 Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations Fletcher, Mark D. Zgheib, Jana Perry, Samuel W. Sensors (Basel) Article Cochlear implants (CIs) recover hearing in severely to profoundly hearing-impaired people by electrically stimulating the cochlea. While they are extremely effective, spatial hearing is typically severely limited. Recent studies have shown that haptic stimulation can supplement the electrical CI signal (electro-haptic stimulation) and substantially improve sound localization. In haptic sound-localization studies, the signal is extracted from the audio received by behind-the-ear devices and delivered to each wrist. Localization is achieved using tactile intensity differences (TIDs) across the wrists, which match sound intensity differences across the ears (a key sound localization cue). The current study established sensitivity to across-limb TIDs at three candidate locations for a wearable haptic device, namely: the lower tricep and the palmar and dorsal wrist. At all locations, TID sensitivity was similar to the sensitivity to across-ear intensity differences for normal-hearing listeners. This suggests that greater haptic sound-localization accuracy than previously shown can be achieved. The dynamic range was also measured and far exceeded that available through electrical CI stimulation for all of the locations, suggesting that haptic stimulation could provide additional sound-intensity information. These results indicate that an effective haptic aid could be deployed for any of the candidate locations, and could offer a low-cost, non-invasive means of improving outcomes for hearing-impaired listeners. MDPI 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8198414/ /pubmed/34071729 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21113770 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fletcher, Mark D.
Zgheib, Jana
Perry, Samuel W.
Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations
title Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations
title_full Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations
title_fullStr Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations
title_short Sensitivity to Haptic Sound-Localization Cues at Different Body Locations
title_sort sensitivity to haptic sound-localization cues at different body locations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071729
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21113770
work_keys_str_mv AT fletchermarkd sensitivitytohapticsoundlocalizationcuesatdifferentbodylocations
AT zgheibjana sensitivitytohapticsoundlocalizationcuesatdifferentbodylocations
AT perrysamuelw sensitivitytohapticsoundlocalizationcuesatdifferentbodylocations