Cargando…

Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards

Accidents due to falls from height are one of the main causes of death in workplaces. Fall arrest systems (FAS) are designed to arrest the fall safely without injuring the accident victim. Their main mission is to restrain the body so as to prevent it from hitting the ground, generating forces and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrión, Elena Ángela, Ferrer, Belén, Monge, Juan Francisco, Saez, Pedro Ignacio, Pomares, Juan Carlos, González, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115823
_version_ 1783707170362097664
author Carrión, Elena Ángela
Ferrer, Belén
Monge, Juan Francisco
Saez, Pedro Ignacio
Pomares, Juan Carlos
González, Antonio
author_facet Carrión, Elena Ángela
Ferrer, Belén
Monge, Juan Francisco
Saez, Pedro Ignacio
Pomares, Juan Carlos
González, Antonio
author_sort Carrión, Elena Ángela
collection PubMed
description Accidents due to falls from height are one of the main causes of death in workplaces. Fall arrest systems (FAS) are designed to arrest the fall safely without injuring the accident victim. Their main mission is to restrain the body so as to prevent it from hitting the ground, generating forces and accelerations in the arrest process that are not harmful. A lack of empirical evidence and scant technical information provided by manufacturers regarding minimum clearance distance (MCD) below anchorage makes it necessary to study the safety distances required in the use of Energy Absorber Lanyards (EAL). This paper aims to determine the MCD below anchorage to arrest a fall using an EAL without hitting the ground. The real deformation of EAL when stopping a fall is studied. Ten EAL models distributed internationally by six manufacturers were chosen. Dynamic behavior tests were performed on the samples. Using image processing the total elongation of the equipment (elastic plus plastic) is obtained. The main conclusions are that maximum plastic elongation could be reduced by 29%. The method described in EN 355: 2002 underestimates elongation by up to 70% for some equipment 20% of EAL’s exceed the maximum arrest force (Fm) allowed in EN 355. The MCD data provided by manufacturers is not reliable. The data provided by manufacturers are incomplete. It is recommended that quality control for EAL’s be strengthened to ensure that products launched onto the market meet the requirement of EN355. The findings of this study recommended increasing MCD distance longer than that calculated according to EN355, at less than 1 m.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8198569
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81985692021-06-14 Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards Carrión, Elena Ángela Ferrer, Belén Monge, Juan Francisco Saez, Pedro Ignacio Pomares, Juan Carlos González, Antonio Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Accidents due to falls from height are one of the main causes of death in workplaces. Fall arrest systems (FAS) are designed to arrest the fall safely without injuring the accident victim. Their main mission is to restrain the body so as to prevent it from hitting the ground, generating forces and accelerations in the arrest process that are not harmful. A lack of empirical evidence and scant technical information provided by manufacturers regarding minimum clearance distance (MCD) below anchorage makes it necessary to study the safety distances required in the use of Energy Absorber Lanyards (EAL). This paper aims to determine the MCD below anchorage to arrest a fall using an EAL without hitting the ground. The real deformation of EAL when stopping a fall is studied. Ten EAL models distributed internationally by six manufacturers were chosen. Dynamic behavior tests were performed on the samples. Using image processing the total elongation of the equipment (elastic plus plastic) is obtained. The main conclusions are that maximum plastic elongation could be reduced by 29%. The method described in EN 355: 2002 underestimates elongation by up to 70% for some equipment 20% of EAL’s exceed the maximum arrest force (Fm) allowed in EN 355. The MCD data provided by manufacturers is not reliable. The data provided by manufacturers are incomplete. It is recommended that quality control for EAL’s be strengthened to ensure that products launched onto the market meet the requirement of EN355. The findings of this study recommended increasing MCD distance longer than that calculated according to EN355, at less than 1 m. MDPI 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8198569/ /pubmed/34071578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115823 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Carrión, Elena Ángela
Ferrer, Belén
Monge, Juan Francisco
Saez, Pedro Ignacio
Pomares, Juan Carlos
González, Antonio
Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards
title Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards
title_full Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards
title_fullStr Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards
title_full_unstemmed Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards
title_short Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards
title_sort minimum clearance distance in fall arrest systems with energy absorber lanyards
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115823
work_keys_str_mv AT carrionelenaangela minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards
AT ferrerbelen minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards
AT mongejuanfrancisco minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards
AT saezpedroignacio minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards
AT pomaresjuancarlos minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards
AT gonzalezantonio minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards