Cargando…
Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards
Accidents due to falls from height are one of the main causes of death in workplaces. Fall arrest systems (FAS) are designed to arrest the fall safely without injuring the accident victim. Their main mission is to restrain the body so as to prevent it from hitting the ground, generating forces and a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115823 |
_version_ | 1783707170362097664 |
---|---|
author | Carrión, Elena Ángela Ferrer, Belén Monge, Juan Francisco Saez, Pedro Ignacio Pomares, Juan Carlos González, Antonio |
author_facet | Carrión, Elena Ángela Ferrer, Belén Monge, Juan Francisco Saez, Pedro Ignacio Pomares, Juan Carlos González, Antonio |
author_sort | Carrión, Elena Ángela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accidents due to falls from height are one of the main causes of death in workplaces. Fall arrest systems (FAS) are designed to arrest the fall safely without injuring the accident victim. Their main mission is to restrain the body so as to prevent it from hitting the ground, generating forces and accelerations in the arrest process that are not harmful. A lack of empirical evidence and scant technical information provided by manufacturers regarding minimum clearance distance (MCD) below anchorage makes it necessary to study the safety distances required in the use of Energy Absorber Lanyards (EAL). This paper aims to determine the MCD below anchorage to arrest a fall using an EAL without hitting the ground. The real deformation of EAL when stopping a fall is studied. Ten EAL models distributed internationally by six manufacturers were chosen. Dynamic behavior tests were performed on the samples. Using image processing the total elongation of the equipment (elastic plus plastic) is obtained. The main conclusions are that maximum plastic elongation could be reduced by 29%. The method described in EN 355: 2002 underestimates elongation by up to 70% for some equipment 20% of EAL’s exceed the maximum arrest force (Fm) allowed in EN 355. The MCD data provided by manufacturers is not reliable. The data provided by manufacturers are incomplete. It is recommended that quality control for EAL’s be strengthened to ensure that products launched onto the market meet the requirement of EN355. The findings of this study recommended increasing MCD distance longer than that calculated according to EN355, at less than 1 m. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8198569 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81985692021-06-14 Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards Carrión, Elena Ángela Ferrer, Belén Monge, Juan Francisco Saez, Pedro Ignacio Pomares, Juan Carlos González, Antonio Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Accidents due to falls from height are one of the main causes of death in workplaces. Fall arrest systems (FAS) are designed to arrest the fall safely without injuring the accident victim. Their main mission is to restrain the body so as to prevent it from hitting the ground, generating forces and accelerations in the arrest process that are not harmful. A lack of empirical evidence and scant technical information provided by manufacturers regarding minimum clearance distance (MCD) below anchorage makes it necessary to study the safety distances required in the use of Energy Absorber Lanyards (EAL). This paper aims to determine the MCD below anchorage to arrest a fall using an EAL without hitting the ground. The real deformation of EAL when stopping a fall is studied. Ten EAL models distributed internationally by six manufacturers were chosen. Dynamic behavior tests were performed on the samples. Using image processing the total elongation of the equipment (elastic plus plastic) is obtained. The main conclusions are that maximum plastic elongation could be reduced by 29%. The method described in EN 355: 2002 underestimates elongation by up to 70% for some equipment 20% of EAL’s exceed the maximum arrest force (Fm) allowed in EN 355. The MCD data provided by manufacturers is not reliable. The data provided by manufacturers are incomplete. It is recommended that quality control for EAL’s be strengthened to ensure that products launched onto the market meet the requirement of EN355. The findings of this study recommended increasing MCD distance longer than that calculated according to EN355, at less than 1 m. MDPI 2021-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8198569/ /pubmed/34071578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115823 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Carrión, Elena Ángela Ferrer, Belén Monge, Juan Francisco Saez, Pedro Ignacio Pomares, Juan Carlos González, Antonio Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards |
title | Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards |
title_full | Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards |
title_fullStr | Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards |
title_short | Minimum Clearance Distance in Fall Arrest Systems with Energy Absorber Lanyards |
title_sort | minimum clearance distance in fall arrest systems with energy absorber lanyards |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8198569/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrionelenaangela minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards AT ferrerbelen minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards AT mongejuanfrancisco minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards AT saezpedroignacio minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards AT pomaresjuancarlos minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards AT gonzalezantonio minimumclearancedistanceinfallarrestsystemswithenergyabsorberlanyards |