Cargando…

Digital Technology in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review

Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been including digital technology tools to overcome limitations in treatment delivery and disease monitoring. In March 2020, we conducted a systematic search on pubmed.gov and clinicaltrials.gov databases (with no restrictions) to identify all relevant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Angelis, Marcello, Lavorgna, Luigi, Carotenuto, Antonio, Petruzzo, Martina, Lanzillo, Roberta, Brescia Morra, Vincenzo, Moccia, Marcello
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112328
_version_ 1783707291569094656
author De Angelis, Marcello
Lavorgna, Luigi
Carotenuto, Antonio
Petruzzo, Martina
Lanzillo, Roberta
Brescia Morra, Vincenzo
Moccia, Marcello
author_facet De Angelis, Marcello
Lavorgna, Luigi
Carotenuto, Antonio
Petruzzo, Martina
Lanzillo, Roberta
Brescia Morra, Vincenzo
Moccia, Marcello
author_sort De Angelis, Marcello
collection PubMed
description Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been including digital technology tools to overcome limitations in treatment delivery and disease monitoring. In March 2020, we conducted a systematic search on pubmed.gov and clinicaltrials.gov databases (with no restrictions) to identify all relevant published and unpublished clinical trials, in English language, including MS patients, in which digital technology was applied. We used “multiple sclerosis” and “clinical trial” as the main search words, and “app”, “digital”, “electronic”, “internet” and “mobile” as additional search words, separately. Digital technology is part of clinical trial interventions to deliver psychotherapy and motor rehabilitation, with exergames, e-training, and robot-assisted exercises. Digital technology has been used to standardise previously existing outcome measures, with automatic acquisitions, reduced inconsistencies, and improved detection of symptoms (e.g., electronic recording of motor performance). Other clinical trials have been using digital technology for monitoring symptoms that would be otherwise difficult to detect (e.g., fatigue, balance), for measuring treatment adherence and side effects, and for self-assessment purposes. Collection of outcome measures is progressively shifting from paper-based on site, to internet-based on site, and, in the future, to internet-based at home, with the detection of clinical and treatment features that would have remained otherwise invisible. Similarly, remote interventions provide new possibilities of motor and cognitive rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8199078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81990782021-06-14 Digital Technology in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review De Angelis, Marcello Lavorgna, Luigi Carotenuto, Antonio Petruzzo, Martina Lanzillo, Roberta Brescia Morra, Vincenzo Moccia, Marcello J Clin Med Review Clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been including digital technology tools to overcome limitations in treatment delivery and disease monitoring. In March 2020, we conducted a systematic search on pubmed.gov and clinicaltrials.gov databases (with no restrictions) to identify all relevant published and unpublished clinical trials, in English language, including MS patients, in which digital technology was applied. We used “multiple sclerosis” and “clinical trial” as the main search words, and “app”, “digital”, “electronic”, “internet” and “mobile” as additional search words, separately. Digital technology is part of clinical trial interventions to deliver psychotherapy and motor rehabilitation, with exergames, e-training, and robot-assisted exercises. Digital technology has been used to standardise previously existing outcome measures, with automatic acquisitions, reduced inconsistencies, and improved detection of symptoms (e.g., electronic recording of motor performance). Other clinical trials have been using digital technology for monitoring symptoms that would be otherwise difficult to detect (e.g., fatigue, balance), for measuring treatment adherence and side effects, and for self-assessment purposes. Collection of outcome measures is progressively shifting from paper-based on site, to internet-based on site, and, in the future, to internet-based at home, with the detection of clinical and treatment features that would have remained otherwise invisible. Similarly, remote interventions provide new possibilities of motor and cognitive rehabilitation. MDPI 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8199078/ /pubmed/34073464 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112328 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
De Angelis, Marcello
Lavorgna, Luigi
Carotenuto, Antonio
Petruzzo, Martina
Lanzillo, Roberta
Brescia Morra, Vincenzo
Moccia, Marcello
Digital Technology in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review
title Digital Technology in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review
title_full Digital Technology in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Digital Technology in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Digital Technology in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review
title_short Digital Technology in Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Review
title_sort digital technology in clinical trials for multiple sclerosis: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112328
work_keys_str_mv AT deangelismarcello digitaltechnologyinclinicaltrialsformultiplesclerosissystematicreview
AT lavorgnaluigi digitaltechnologyinclinicaltrialsformultiplesclerosissystematicreview
AT carotenutoantonio digitaltechnologyinclinicaltrialsformultiplesclerosissystematicreview
AT petruzzomartina digitaltechnologyinclinicaltrialsformultiplesclerosissystematicreview
AT lanzilloroberta digitaltechnologyinclinicaltrialsformultiplesclerosissystematicreview
AT bresciamorravincenzo digitaltechnologyinclinicaltrialsformultiplesclerosissystematicreview
AT mocciamarcello digitaltechnologyinclinicaltrialsformultiplesclerosissystematicreview