Cargando…
A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma
Despite being one of the most studied eye diseases, clinical translation of glaucoma research is hampered, at least in part, by the lack of validated preclinical models and readouts. The most popular experimental glaucoma model is the murine microbead occlusion model, yet the observed mild phenotype...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115633 |
_version_ | 1783707315906543616 |
---|---|
author | Claes, Marie Santos, Joana R. F. Masin, Luca Cools, Lien Davis, Benjamin M. Arckens, Lutgarde Farrow, Karl De Groef, Lies Moons, Lieve |
author_facet | Claes, Marie Santos, Joana R. F. Masin, Luca Cools, Lien Davis, Benjamin M. Arckens, Lutgarde Farrow, Karl De Groef, Lies Moons, Lieve |
author_sort | Claes, Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite being one of the most studied eye diseases, clinical translation of glaucoma research is hampered, at least in part, by the lack of validated preclinical models and readouts. The most popular experimental glaucoma model is the murine microbead occlusion model, yet the observed mild phenotype, mixed success rate, and weak reproducibility urge for an expansion of available readout tools. For this purpose, we evaluated various measures that reflect early onset glaucomatous changes in the murine microbead occlusion model. Anterior chamber depth measurements and scotopic threshold response recordings were identified as an outstanding set of tools to assess the model’s success rate and to chart glaucomatous damage (or neuroprotection in future studies), respectively. Both are easy-to-measure, in vivo tools with a fast acquisition time and high translatability to the clinic and can be used, whenever judged beneficial, in combination with the more conventional measures in present-day glaucoma research (i.e., intraocular pressure measurements and post-mortem histological analyses). Furthermore, we highlighted the use of dendritic arbor analysis as an alternative histological readout for retinal ganglion cell density counts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8199180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81991802021-06-14 A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma Claes, Marie Santos, Joana R. F. Masin, Luca Cools, Lien Davis, Benjamin M. Arckens, Lutgarde Farrow, Karl De Groef, Lies Moons, Lieve Int J Mol Sci Article Despite being one of the most studied eye diseases, clinical translation of glaucoma research is hampered, at least in part, by the lack of validated preclinical models and readouts. The most popular experimental glaucoma model is the murine microbead occlusion model, yet the observed mild phenotype, mixed success rate, and weak reproducibility urge for an expansion of available readout tools. For this purpose, we evaluated various measures that reflect early onset glaucomatous changes in the murine microbead occlusion model. Anterior chamber depth measurements and scotopic threshold response recordings were identified as an outstanding set of tools to assess the model’s success rate and to chart glaucomatous damage (or neuroprotection in future studies), respectively. Both are easy-to-measure, in vivo tools with a fast acquisition time and high translatability to the clinic and can be used, whenever judged beneficial, in combination with the more conventional measures in present-day glaucoma research (i.e., intraocular pressure measurements and post-mortem histological analyses). Furthermore, we highlighted the use of dendritic arbor analysis as an alternative histological readout for retinal ganglion cell density counts. MDPI 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8199180/ /pubmed/34073191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115633 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Claes, Marie Santos, Joana R. F. Masin, Luca Cools, Lien Davis, Benjamin M. Arckens, Lutgarde Farrow, Karl De Groef, Lies Moons, Lieve A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma |
title | A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma |
title_full | A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma |
title_fullStr | A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma |
title_short | A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma |
title_sort | fair assessment of evaluation tools for the murine microbead occlusion model of glaucoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claesmarie afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT santosjoanarf afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT masinluca afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT coolslien afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT davisbenjaminm afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT arckenslutgarde afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT farrowkarl afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT degroeflies afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT moonslieve afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT claesmarie fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT santosjoanarf fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT masinluca fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT coolslien fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT davisbenjaminm fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT arckenslutgarde fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT farrowkarl fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT degroeflies fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma AT moonslieve fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma |