Cargando…

A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma

Despite being one of the most studied eye diseases, clinical translation of glaucoma research is hampered, at least in part, by the lack of validated preclinical models and readouts. The most popular experimental glaucoma model is the murine microbead occlusion model, yet the observed mild phenotype...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claes, Marie, Santos, Joana R. F., Masin, Luca, Cools, Lien, Davis, Benjamin M., Arckens, Lutgarde, Farrow, Karl, De Groef, Lies, Moons, Lieve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115633
_version_ 1783707315906543616
author Claes, Marie
Santos, Joana R. F.
Masin, Luca
Cools, Lien
Davis, Benjamin M.
Arckens, Lutgarde
Farrow, Karl
De Groef, Lies
Moons, Lieve
author_facet Claes, Marie
Santos, Joana R. F.
Masin, Luca
Cools, Lien
Davis, Benjamin M.
Arckens, Lutgarde
Farrow, Karl
De Groef, Lies
Moons, Lieve
author_sort Claes, Marie
collection PubMed
description Despite being one of the most studied eye diseases, clinical translation of glaucoma research is hampered, at least in part, by the lack of validated preclinical models and readouts. The most popular experimental glaucoma model is the murine microbead occlusion model, yet the observed mild phenotype, mixed success rate, and weak reproducibility urge for an expansion of available readout tools. For this purpose, we evaluated various measures that reflect early onset glaucomatous changes in the murine microbead occlusion model. Anterior chamber depth measurements and scotopic threshold response recordings were identified as an outstanding set of tools to assess the model’s success rate and to chart glaucomatous damage (or neuroprotection in future studies), respectively. Both are easy-to-measure, in vivo tools with a fast acquisition time and high translatability to the clinic and can be used, whenever judged beneficial, in combination with the more conventional measures in present-day glaucoma research (i.e., intraocular pressure measurements and post-mortem histological analyses). Furthermore, we highlighted the use of dendritic arbor analysis as an alternative histological readout for retinal ganglion cell density counts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8199180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81991802021-06-14 A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma Claes, Marie Santos, Joana R. F. Masin, Luca Cools, Lien Davis, Benjamin M. Arckens, Lutgarde Farrow, Karl De Groef, Lies Moons, Lieve Int J Mol Sci Article Despite being one of the most studied eye diseases, clinical translation of glaucoma research is hampered, at least in part, by the lack of validated preclinical models and readouts. The most popular experimental glaucoma model is the murine microbead occlusion model, yet the observed mild phenotype, mixed success rate, and weak reproducibility urge for an expansion of available readout tools. For this purpose, we evaluated various measures that reflect early onset glaucomatous changes in the murine microbead occlusion model. Anterior chamber depth measurements and scotopic threshold response recordings were identified as an outstanding set of tools to assess the model’s success rate and to chart glaucomatous damage (or neuroprotection in future studies), respectively. Both are easy-to-measure, in vivo tools with a fast acquisition time and high translatability to the clinic and can be used, whenever judged beneficial, in combination with the more conventional measures in present-day glaucoma research (i.e., intraocular pressure measurements and post-mortem histological analyses). Furthermore, we highlighted the use of dendritic arbor analysis as an alternative histological readout for retinal ganglion cell density counts. MDPI 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8199180/ /pubmed/34073191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115633 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Claes, Marie
Santos, Joana R. F.
Masin, Luca
Cools, Lien
Davis, Benjamin M.
Arckens, Lutgarde
Farrow, Karl
De Groef, Lies
Moons, Lieve
A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma
title A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma
title_full A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma
title_fullStr A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma
title_short A Fair Assessment of Evaluation Tools for the Murine Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma
title_sort fair assessment of evaluation tools for the murine microbead occlusion model of glaucoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115633
work_keys_str_mv AT claesmarie afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT santosjoanarf afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT masinluca afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT coolslien afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT davisbenjaminm afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT arckenslutgarde afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT farrowkarl afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT degroeflies afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT moonslieve afairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT claesmarie fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT santosjoanarf fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT masinluca fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT coolslien fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT davisbenjaminm fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT arckenslutgarde fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT farrowkarl fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT degroeflies fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma
AT moonslieve fairassessmentofevaluationtoolsforthemurinemicrobeadocclusionmodelofglaucoma