Cargando…
Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China
Landslides are one of the major geohazards threatening human society. The objective of this study was to conduct a landslide hazard susceptibility assessment for Ruijin, Jiangxi, China, and to provide technical support to the local government for implementing disaster reduction and prevention measur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115906 |
_version_ | 1783707319158177792 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Xiaoting Wu, Weicheng Lin, Ziyu Zhang, Guiliang Chen, Renxiang Song, Yong Wang, Zhiling Lang, Tao Qin, Yaozu Ou, Penghui Huangfu, Wenchao Zhang, Yang Xie, Lifeng Huang, Xiaolan Fu, Xiao Li, Jie Jiang, Jingheng Zhang, Ming Liu, Yixuan Peng, Shanling Shao, Chongjian Bai, Yonghui Zhang, Xiaofeng Liu, Xiangtong Liu, Wenheng |
author_facet | Zhou, Xiaoting Wu, Weicheng Lin, Ziyu Zhang, Guiliang Chen, Renxiang Song, Yong Wang, Zhiling Lang, Tao Qin, Yaozu Ou, Penghui Huangfu, Wenchao Zhang, Yang Xie, Lifeng Huang, Xiaolan Fu, Xiao Li, Jie Jiang, Jingheng Zhang, Ming Liu, Yixuan Peng, Shanling Shao, Chongjian Bai, Yonghui Zhang, Xiaofeng Liu, Xiangtong Liu, Wenheng |
author_sort | Zhou, Xiaoting |
collection | PubMed |
description | Landslides are one of the major geohazards threatening human society. The objective of this study was to conduct a landslide hazard susceptibility assessment for Ruijin, Jiangxi, China, and to provide technical support to the local government for implementing disaster reduction and prevention measures. Machine learning approaches, e.g., random forests (RFs) and support vector machines (SVMs) were employed and multiple geo-environmental factors such as land cover, NDVI, landform, rainfall, lithology, and proximity to faults, roads, and rivers, etc., were utilized to achieve our purposes. For categorical factors, three processing approaches were proposed: simple numerical labeling (SNL), weight assignment (WA)-based and frequency ratio (FR)-based. Then 19 geo-environmental factors were respectively converted into raster to constitute three 19-band datasets, i.e., DS1, DS2, and DS3 from three different processes. Then, 155 observed landslides that occurred in the past decades were vectorized, among which 70% were randomly selected to compose a training set (TS1) and the remaining 30% to form a validation set (VS1). A number of non-landslide (no-risk) samples distributed in the whole study area were identified in low slope (<1–3°) zones such as urban areas and croplands, and also added to the TS1 and VS1 in the same ratio. For comparison, we used the FR approach to identify the no-risk samples in both flat and non-flat areas, and merged them into the field-observed landslides to constitute another pair of training and validation sets (TS2 and VS2) using the same ratio of 7:3. The RF algorithm was applied to model the probability of the landslide occurrence using DS1, DS2, and DS3 as predictive variables and TS1 and TS2 for training to obtain the SNL-based, WA-based, and FR-based RF models, respectively. Verified against VS1 and VS2, the three models have similar overall accuracy (OA) and Kappa coefficient (KC), which are 89.61%, 91.47%, and 94.54%, and 0.7926, 0.8299, and 0.8908, respectively. All of them are much better than the three models obtained by SVM algorithm with OA of 81.79%, 82.86%, and 83%, and KC of 0.6337, 0.655, and 0.660. New case verification with the recent 26 landslide events of 2017–2020 revealed that the landslide susceptibility map from WA-based RF modeling was able to properly identify the high and very high susceptibility zones where 23 new landslides had occurred, and performed better than the SNL-based and FR-based RF modeling, though the latter has a slightly higher OA and KC. Hence, we concluded that all three RF models achieve reasonable risk prediction, but WA-based and FR-based RF modeling deserves a recommendation for application elsewhere. The results of this study may serve as reference for the local authorities in prevention and early warning of landslide hazards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8199194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81991942021-06-14 Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China Zhou, Xiaoting Wu, Weicheng Lin, Ziyu Zhang, Guiliang Chen, Renxiang Song, Yong Wang, Zhiling Lang, Tao Qin, Yaozu Ou, Penghui Huangfu, Wenchao Zhang, Yang Xie, Lifeng Huang, Xiaolan Fu, Xiao Li, Jie Jiang, Jingheng Zhang, Ming Liu, Yixuan Peng, Shanling Shao, Chongjian Bai, Yonghui Zhang, Xiaofeng Liu, Xiangtong Liu, Wenheng Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Landslides are one of the major geohazards threatening human society. The objective of this study was to conduct a landslide hazard susceptibility assessment for Ruijin, Jiangxi, China, and to provide technical support to the local government for implementing disaster reduction and prevention measures. Machine learning approaches, e.g., random forests (RFs) and support vector machines (SVMs) were employed and multiple geo-environmental factors such as land cover, NDVI, landform, rainfall, lithology, and proximity to faults, roads, and rivers, etc., were utilized to achieve our purposes. For categorical factors, three processing approaches were proposed: simple numerical labeling (SNL), weight assignment (WA)-based and frequency ratio (FR)-based. Then 19 geo-environmental factors were respectively converted into raster to constitute three 19-band datasets, i.e., DS1, DS2, and DS3 from three different processes. Then, 155 observed landslides that occurred in the past decades were vectorized, among which 70% were randomly selected to compose a training set (TS1) and the remaining 30% to form a validation set (VS1). A number of non-landslide (no-risk) samples distributed in the whole study area were identified in low slope (<1–3°) zones such as urban areas and croplands, and also added to the TS1 and VS1 in the same ratio. For comparison, we used the FR approach to identify the no-risk samples in both flat and non-flat areas, and merged them into the field-observed landslides to constitute another pair of training and validation sets (TS2 and VS2) using the same ratio of 7:3. The RF algorithm was applied to model the probability of the landslide occurrence using DS1, DS2, and DS3 as predictive variables and TS1 and TS2 for training to obtain the SNL-based, WA-based, and FR-based RF models, respectively. Verified against VS1 and VS2, the three models have similar overall accuracy (OA) and Kappa coefficient (KC), which are 89.61%, 91.47%, and 94.54%, and 0.7926, 0.8299, and 0.8908, respectively. All of them are much better than the three models obtained by SVM algorithm with OA of 81.79%, 82.86%, and 83%, and KC of 0.6337, 0.655, and 0.660. New case verification with the recent 26 landslide events of 2017–2020 revealed that the landslide susceptibility map from WA-based RF modeling was able to properly identify the high and very high susceptibility zones where 23 new landslides had occurred, and performed better than the SNL-based and FR-based RF modeling, though the latter has a slightly higher OA and KC. Hence, we concluded that all three RF models achieve reasonable risk prediction, but WA-based and FR-based RF modeling deserves a recommendation for application elsewhere. The results of this study may serve as reference for the local authorities in prevention and early warning of landslide hazards. MDPI 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8199194/ /pubmed/34072874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115906 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhou, Xiaoting Wu, Weicheng Lin, Ziyu Zhang, Guiliang Chen, Renxiang Song, Yong Wang, Zhiling Lang, Tao Qin, Yaozu Ou, Penghui Huangfu, Wenchao Zhang, Yang Xie, Lifeng Huang, Xiaolan Fu, Xiao Li, Jie Jiang, Jingheng Zhang, Ming Liu, Yixuan Peng, Shanling Shao, Chongjian Bai, Yonghui Zhang, Xiaofeng Liu, Xiangtong Liu, Wenheng Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China |
title | Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China |
title_full | Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China |
title_fullStr | Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China |
title_full_unstemmed | Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China |
title_short | Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China |
title_sort | zonation of landslide susceptibility in ruijin, jiangxi, china |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouxiaoting zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT wuweicheng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT linziyu zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT zhangguiliang zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT chenrenxiang zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT songyong zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT wangzhiling zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT langtao zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT qinyaozu zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT oupenghui zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT huangfuwenchao zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT zhangyang zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT xielifeng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT huangxiaolan zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT fuxiao zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT lijie zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT jiangjingheng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT zhangming zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT liuyixuan zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT pengshanling zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT shaochongjian zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT baiyonghui zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT zhangxiaofeng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT liuxiangtong zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina AT liuwenheng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina |