Cargando…

Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China

Landslides are one of the major geohazards threatening human society. The objective of this study was to conduct a landslide hazard susceptibility assessment for Ruijin, Jiangxi, China, and to provide technical support to the local government for implementing disaster reduction and prevention measur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Xiaoting, Wu, Weicheng, Lin, Ziyu, Zhang, Guiliang, Chen, Renxiang, Song, Yong, Wang, Zhiling, Lang, Tao, Qin, Yaozu, Ou, Penghui, Huangfu, Wenchao, Zhang, Yang, Xie, Lifeng, Huang, Xiaolan, Fu, Xiao, Li, Jie, Jiang, Jingheng, Zhang, Ming, Liu, Yixuan, Peng, Shanling, Shao, Chongjian, Bai, Yonghui, Zhang, Xiaofeng, Liu, Xiangtong, Liu, Wenheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115906
_version_ 1783707319158177792
author Zhou, Xiaoting
Wu, Weicheng
Lin, Ziyu
Zhang, Guiliang
Chen, Renxiang
Song, Yong
Wang, Zhiling
Lang, Tao
Qin, Yaozu
Ou, Penghui
Huangfu, Wenchao
Zhang, Yang
Xie, Lifeng
Huang, Xiaolan
Fu, Xiao
Li, Jie
Jiang, Jingheng
Zhang, Ming
Liu, Yixuan
Peng, Shanling
Shao, Chongjian
Bai, Yonghui
Zhang, Xiaofeng
Liu, Xiangtong
Liu, Wenheng
author_facet Zhou, Xiaoting
Wu, Weicheng
Lin, Ziyu
Zhang, Guiliang
Chen, Renxiang
Song, Yong
Wang, Zhiling
Lang, Tao
Qin, Yaozu
Ou, Penghui
Huangfu, Wenchao
Zhang, Yang
Xie, Lifeng
Huang, Xiaolan
Fu, Xiao
Li, Jie
Jiang, Jingheng
Zhang, Ming
Liu, Yixuan
Peng, Shanling
Shao, Chongjian
Bai, Yonghui
Zhang, Xiaofeng
Liu, Xiangtong
Liu, Wenheng
author_sort Zhou, Xiaoting
collection PubMed
description Landslides are one of the major geohazards threatening human society. The objective of this study was to conduct a landslide hazard susceptibility assessment for Ruijin, Jiangxi, China, and to provide technical support to the local government for implementing disaster reduction and prevention measures. Machine learning approaches, e.g., random forests (RFs) and support vector machines (SVMs) were employed and multiple geo-environmental factors such as land cover, NDVI, landform, rainfall, lithology, and proximity to faults, roads, and rivers, etc., were utilized to achieve our purposes. For categorical factors, three processing approaches were proposed: simple numerical labeling (SNL), weight assignment (WA)-based and frequency ratio (FR)-based. Then 19 geo-environmental factors were respectively converted into raster to constitute three 19-band datasets, i.e., DS1, DS2, and DS3 from three different processes. Then, 155 observed landslides that occurred in the past decades were vectorized, among which 70% were randomly selected to compose a training set (TS1) and the remaining 30% to form a validation set (VS1). A number of non-landslide (no-risk) samples distributed in the whole study area were identified in low slope (<1–3°) zones such as urban areas and croplands, and also added to the TS1 and VS1 in the same ratio. For comparison, we used the FR approach to identify the no-risk samples in both flat and non-flat areas, and merged them into the field-observed landslides to constitute another pair of training and validation sets (TS2 and VS2) using the same ratio of 7:3. The RF algorithm was applied to model the probability of the landslide occurrence using DS1, DS2, and DS3 as predictive variables and TS1 and TS2 for training to obtain the SNL-based, WA-based, and FR-based RF models, respectively. Verified against VS1 and VS2, the three models have similar overall accuracy (OA) and Kappa coefficient (KC), which are 89.61%, 91.47%, and 94.54%, and 0.7926, 0.8299, and 0.8908, respectively. All of them are much better than the three models obtained by SVM algorithm with OA of 81.79%, 82.86%, and 83%, and KC of 0.6337, 0.655, and 0.660. New case verification with the recent 26 landslide events of 2017–2020 revealed that the landslide susceptibility map from WA-based RF modeling was able to properly identify the high and very high susceptibility zones where 23 new landslides had occurred, and performed better than the SNL-based and FR-based RF modeling, though the latter has a slightly higher OA and KC. Hence, we concluded that all three RF models achieve reasonable risk prediction, but WA-based and FR-based RF modeling deserves a recommendation for application elsewhere. The results of this study may serve as reference for the local authorities in prevention and early warning of landslide hazards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8199194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81991942021-06-14 Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China Zhou, Xiaoting Wu, Weicheng Lin, Ziyu Zhang, Guiliang Chen, Renxiang Song, Yong Wang, Zhiling Lang, Tao Qin, Yaozu Ou, Penghui Huangfu, Wenchao Zhang, Yang Xie, Lifeng Huang, Xiaolan Fu, Xiao Li, Jie Jiang, Jingheng Zhang, Ming Liu, Yixuan Peng, Shanling Shao, Chongjian Bai, Yonghui Zhang, Xiaofeng Liu, Xiangtong Liu, Wenheng Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Landslides are one of the major geohazards threatening human society. The objective of this study was to conduct a landslide hazard susceptibility assessment for Ruijin, Jiangxi, China, and to provide technical support to the local government for implementing disaster reduction and prevention measures. Machine learning approaches, e.g., random forests (RFs) and support vector machines (SVMs) were employed and multiple geo-environmental factors such as land cover, NDVI, landform, rainfall, lithology, and proximity to faults, roads, and rivers, etc., were utilized to achieve our purposes. For categorical factors, three processing approaches were proposed: simple numerical labeling (SNL), weight assignment (WA)-based and frequency ratio (FR)-based. Then 19 geo-environmental factors were respectively converted into raster to constitute three 19-band datasets, i.e., DS1, DS2, and DS3 from three different processes. Then, 155 observed landslides that occurred in the past decades were vectorized, among which 70% were randomly selected to compose a training set (TS1) and the remaining 30% to form a validation set (VS1). A number of non-landslide (no-risk) samples distributed in the whole study area were identified in low slope (<1–3°) zones such as urban areas and croplands, and also added to the TS1 and VS1 in the same ratio. For comparison, we used the FR approach to identify the no-risk samples in both flat and non-flat areas, and merged them into the field-observed landslides to constitute another pair of training and validation sets (TS2 and VS2) using the same ratio of 7:3. The RF algorithm was applied to model the probability of the landslide occurrence using DS1, DS2, and DS3 as predictive variables and TS1 and TS2 for training to obtain the SNL-based, WA-based, and FR-based RF models, respectively. Verified against VS1 and VS2, the three models have similar overall accuracy (OA) and Kappa coefficient (KC), which are 89.61%, 91.47%, and 94.54%, and 0.7926, 0.8299, and 0.8908, respectively. All of them are much better than the three models obtained by SVM algorithm with OA of 81.79%, 82.86%, and 83%, and KC of 0.6337, 0.655, and 0.660. New case verification with the recent 26 landslide events of 2017–2020 revealed that the landslide susceptibility map from WA-based RF modeling was able to properly identify the high and very high susceptibility zones where 23 new landslides had occurred, and performed better than the SNL-based and FR-based RF modeling, though the latter has a slightly higher OA and KC. Hence, we concluded that all three RF models achieve reasonable risk prediction, but WA-based and FR-based RF modeling deserves a recommendation for application elsewhere. The results of this study may serve as reference for the local authorities in prevention and early warning of landslide hazards. MDPI 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8199194/ /pubmed/34072874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115906 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhou, Xiaoting
Wu, Weicheng
Lin, Ziyu
Zhang, Guiliang
Chen, Renxiang
Song, Yong
Wang, Zhiling
Lang, Tao
Qin, Yaozu
Ou, Penghui
Huangfu, Wenchao
Zhang, Yang
Xie, Lifeng
Huang, Xiaolan
Fu, Xiao
Li, Jie
Jiang, Jingheng
Zhang, Ming
Liu, Yixuan
Peng, Shanling
Shao, Chongjian
Bai, Yonghui
Zhang, Xiaofeng
Liu, Xiangtong
Liu, Wenheng
Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China
title Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China
title_full Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China
title_fullStr Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China
title_full_unstemmed Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China
title_short Zonation of Landslide Susceptibility in Ruijin, Jiangxi, China
title_sort zonation of landslide susceptibility in ruijin, jiangxi, china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34072874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115906
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouxiaoting zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT wuweicheng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT linziyu zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT zhangguiliang zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT chenrenxiang zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT songyong zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT wangzhiling zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT langtao zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT qinyaozu zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT oupenghui zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT huangfuwenchao zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT zhangyang zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT xielifeng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT huangxiaolan zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT fuxiao zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT lijie zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT jiangjingheng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT zhangming zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT liuyixuan zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT pengshanling zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT shaochongjian zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT baiyonghui zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT zhangxiaofeng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT liuxiangtong zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina
AT liuwenheng zonationoflandslidesusceptibilityinruijinjiangxichina