Cargando…

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Disks for Digitally Designed Dentures

In this study, the physical properties of a custom block manufactured using a self-polymerizing resin (Custom-block), the commercially available CAD/CAM PMMA disk (PMMA-disk), and a heat-polymerizing resin (Conventional PMMA) were evaluated via three different tests. The Custom-block was polymerized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hada, Tamaki, Kanazawa, Manabu, Iwaki, Maiko, Katheng, Awutsadaporn, Minakuchi, Shunsuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13111745
_version_ 1783707329574731776
author Hada, Tamaki
Kanazawa, Manabu
Iwaki, Maiko
Katheng, Awutsadaporn
Minakuchi, Shunsuke
author_facet Hada, Tamaki
Kanazawa, Manabu
Iwaki, Maiko
Katheng, Awutsadaporn
Minakuchi, Shunsuke
author_sort Hada, Tamaki
collection PubMed
description In this study, the physical properties of a custom block manufactured using a self-polymerizing resin (Custom-block), the commercially available CAD/CAM PMMA disk (PMMA-disk), and a heat-polymerizing resin (Conventional PMMA) were evaluated via three different tests. The Custom-block was polymerized by pouring the self-polymerizing resin into a special tray, and Conventional PMMA was polymerized with a heat-curing method, according to the manufacturer’s recommended procedure. The specimens of each group were subjected to three-point bending, water sorption and solubility, and staining tests. The results showed that the materials met the requirements of the ISO standards in all tests, except for the staining tests. The highest flexural strength was exhibited by the PMMA-disk, followed by the Custom-block and the Conventional PMMA, and a significant difference was observed in the flexural strengths of all the materials (p < 0.001). The Custom-block showed a significantly higher flexural modulus and water solubility. The water sorption and discoloration of the Custom-block were significantly higher than those of the PMMA-disk, but not significantly different from those of the Conventional PMMA. In conclusion, the mechanical properties of the three materials differed depending on the manufacturing method, which considerably affected their flexural strength, flexural modulus, water sorption and solubility, and discoloration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8199238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81992382021-06-14 Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Disks for Digitally Designed Dentures Hada, Tamaki Kanazawa, Manabu Iwaki, Maiko Katheng, Awutsadaporn Minakuchi, Shunsuke Polymers (Basel) Article In this study, the physical properties of a custom block manufactured using a self-polymerizing resin (Custom-block), the commercially available CAD/CAM PMMA disk (PMMA-disk), and a heat-polymerizing resin (Conventional PMMA) were evaluated via three different tests. The Custom-block was polymerized by pouring the self-polymerizing resin into a special tray, and Conventional PMMA was polymerized with a heat-curing method, according to the manufacturer’s recommended procedure. The specimens of each group were subjected to three-point bending, water sorption and solubility, and staining tests. The results showed that the materials met the requirements of the ISO standards in all tests, except for the staining tests. The highest flexural strength was exhibited by the PMMA-disk, followed by the Custom-block and the Conventional PMMA, and a significant difference was observed in the flexural strengths of all the materials (p < 0.001). The Custom-block showed a significantly higher flexural modulus and water solubility. The water sorption and discoloration of the Custom-block were significantly higher than those of the PMMA-disk, but not significantly different from those of the Conventional PMMA. In conclusion, the mechanical properties of the three materials differed depending on the manufacturing method, which considerably affected their flexural strength, flexural modulus, water sorption and solubility, and discoloration. MDPI 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8199238/ /pubmed/34073564 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13111745 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hada, Tamaki
Kanazawa, Manabu
Iwaki, Maiko
Katheng, Awutsadaporn
Minakuchi, Shunsuke
Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Disks for Digitally Designed Dentures
title Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Disks for Digitally Designed Dentures
title_full Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Disks for Digitally Designed Dentures
title_fullStr Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Disks for Digitally Designed Dentures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Disks for Digitally Designed Dentures
title_short Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Disks for Digitally Designed Dentures
title_sort comparison of mechanical properties of pmma disks for digitally designed dentures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34073564
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13111745
work_keys_str_mv AT hadatamaki comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofpmmadisksfordigitallydesigneddentures
AT kanazawamanabu comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofpmmadisksfordigitallydesigneddentures
AT iwakimaiko comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofpmmadisksfordigitallydesigneddentures
AT kathengawutsadaporn comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofpmmadisksfordigitallydesigneddentures
AT minakuchishunsuke comparisonofmechanicalpropertiesofpmmadisksfordigitallydesigneddentures