Cargando…
Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a hydrogel spacer in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has not been clarified. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT in combination with a hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer. METHODS: This is a prospective single-center, single-arm phase II study. Prostate can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01834-1 |
_version_ | 1783707366871531520 |
---|---|
author | Ogita, Mami Yamashita, Hideomi Nozawa, Yuki Ozaki, Sho Sawayanagi, Subaru Ohta, Takeshi Nakagawa, Keiichi |
author_facet | Ogita, Mami Yamashita, Hideomi Nozawa, Yuki Ozaki, Sho Sawayanagi, Subaru Ohta, Takeshi Nakagawa, Keiichi |
author_sort | Ogita, Mami |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a hydrogel spacer in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has not been clarified. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT in combination with a hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer. METHODS: This is a prospective single-center, single-arm phase II study. Prostate cancer patients without lymph node or distant metastasis were eligible. All patients received a hydrogel spacer insertion, followed by SBRT of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions with volumetric modulated arc therapy. The primary endpoint was physician-assessed acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity within 3 months. The secondary endpoints were physician-assessed acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity, patient-reported outcomes evaluated by the EPIC and FACT-P questionnaires, and dosimetric comparison. We used propensity score-matched analyses to compare patients with the hydrogel spacer with those without the spacer. The historical data of the control without a hydrogel spacer was obtained from our hospital’s electronic records. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled between February 2017 and July 2018. A hydrogel spacer significantly reduced the dose to the rectum. Grade 2 acute GI and GU toxicity occurred in seven (18%) and 17 (44%) patients. The EPIC bowel and urinary summary score declined from the baseline to the first month (P < 0.01, < 0.01), yet it was still significantly lower in the third month (P < 0.01, P = 0.04). For propensity score-matched analyses, no significant differences in acute GI and GU toxicity were observed between the two groups. The EPIC bowel summary score was significantly better in the spacer group at 1 month (82.2 in the spacer group and 68.5 in the control group). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT with a hydrogel spacer had the dosimetric benefits of reducing the rectal doses. The use of the hydrogel spacer did not reduce physician-assessed acute toxicity, but it improved patient-reported acute bowel toxicity. Trial registration: Trial registration: UMIN-CTR, UMIN000026213. Registered 19 February 2017, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000029385. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8199395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81993952021-06-15 Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison Ogita, Mami Yamashita, Hideomi Nozawa, Yuki Ozaki, Sho Sawayanagi, Subaru Ohta, Takeshi Nakagawa, Keiichi Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The efficacy of a hydrogel spacer in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has not been clarified. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of SBRT in combination with a hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer. METHODS: This is a prospective single-center, single-arm phase II study. Prostate cancer patients without lymph node or distant metastasis were eligible. All patients received a hydrogel spacer insertion, followed by SBRT of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions with volumetric modulated arc therapy. The primary endpoint was physician-assessed acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity within 3 months. The secondary endpoints were physician-assessed acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity, patient-reported outcomes evaluated by the EPIC and FACT-P questionnaires, and dosimetric comparison. We used propensity score-matched analyses to compare patients with the hydrogel spacer with those without the spacer. The historical data of the control without a hydrogel spacer was obtained from our hospital’s electronic records. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled between February 2017 and July 2018. A hydrogel spacer significantly reduced the dose to the rectum. Grade 2 acute GI and GU toxicity occurred in seven (18%) and 17 (44%) patients. The EPIC bowel and urinary summary score declined from the baseline to the first month (P < 0.01, < 0.01), yet it was still significantly lower in the third month (P < 0.01, P = 0.04). For propensity score-matched analyses, no significant differences in acute GI and GU toxicity were observed between the two groups. The EPIC bowel summary score was significantly better in the spacer group at 1 month (82.2 in the spacer group and 68.5 in the control group). CONCLUSIONS: SBRT with a hydrogel spacer had the dosimetric benefits of reducing the rectal doses. The use of the hydrogel spacer did not reduce physician-assessed acute toxicity, but it improved patient-reported acute bowel toxicity. Trial registration: Trial registration: UMIN-CTR, UMIN000026213. Registered 19 February 2017, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000029385. BioMed Central 2021-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8199395/ /pubmed/34118956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01834-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ogita, Mami Yamashita, Hideomi Nozawa, Yuki Ozaki, Sho Sawayanagi, Subaru Ohta, Takeshi Nakagawa, Keiichi Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison |
title | Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison |
title_full | Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison |
title_fullStr | Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison |
title_short | Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison |
title_sort | phase ii study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34118956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01834-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogitamami phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiotherapywithhydrogelspacerforprostatecanceracutetoxicityandpropensityscorematchedcomparison AT yamashitahideomi phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiotherapywithhydrogelspacerforprostatecanceracutetoxicityandpropensityscorematchedcomparison AT nozawayuki phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiotherapywithhydrogelspacerforprostatecanceracutetoxicityandpropensityscorematchedcomparison AT ozakisho phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiotherapywithhydrogelspacerforprostatecanceracutetoxicityandpropensityscorematchedcomparison AT sawayanagisubaru phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiotherapywithhydrogelspacerforprostatecanceracutetoxicityandpropensityscorematchedcomparison AT ohtatakeshi phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiotherapywithhydrogelspacerforprostatecanceracutetoxicityandpropensityscorematchedcomparison AT nakagawakeiichi phaseiistudyofstereotacticbodyradiotherapywithhydrogelspacerforprostatecanceracutetoxicityandpropensityscorematchedcomparison |