Cargando…

The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France

Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual chronic pelvic pain (NMCPP) are symptoms that are probably underreported and neglected. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and overlapping relations between these symptoms among a general population of French women of reproductive age. A cross-sec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Margueritte, François, Fritel, Xavier, Zins, Marie, Goldberg, Marcel, Panjo, Henri, Fauconnier, Arnaud, Ringa, Virginie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112481
_version_ 1783707476847230976
author Margueritte, François
Fritel, Xavier
Zins, Marie
Goldberg, Marcel
Panjo, Henri
Fauconnier, Arnaud
Ringa, Virginie
author_facet Margueritte, François
Fritel, Xavier
Zins, Marie
Goldberg, Marcel
Panjo, Henri
Fauconnier, Arnaud
Ringa, Virginie
author_sort Margueritte, François
collection PubMed
description Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual chronic pelvic pain (NMCPP) are symptoms that are probably underreported and neglected. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and overlapping relations between these symptoms among a general population of French women of reproductive age. A cross-sectional study among the nationwide CONSTANCES cohort study recruiting a representative sample of women within different French areas was constructed. Women aged 18–49 years (n = 21,287) who reported periods in the previous three months and experienced intercourse at least once were asked about prevalence of three types of chronic pelvic pain: mild, moderate and severe dysmenorrhea; dyspareunia assessed according to its frequency; NMCPP from a binary question. Between the start of 2012 through the end of 2017, 21,287 women were enrolled, 39.8% of them (95% confidence interval (CI), 39.2–40.5) reported moderate to severe dysmenorrhea; 20.3% (95% CI, 18.7–21.9) of the youngest group (18–24 years) reported severe dysmenorrhea. Dyspareunia was reported to happen often or always by 7.9% (95% CI, 7.5–8.2) and peaked among the youngest women at 12.8% (95% CI, 11.5–14.1). NMCPP was reported by 17.0% (95% CI, 16.5–17.5). Moreover, 7.5% (95% CI, 6.4–8.6) of the women reported two or more types of severe or frequent pain. More attention should be paid to this substantial proportion (7.5%) of French women of reproductive age who experience multiple, severe and frequent pelvic pain symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8199870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81998702021-06-14 The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France Margueritte, François Fritel, Xavier Zins, Marie Goldberg, Marcel Panjo, Henri Fauconnier, Arnaud Ringa, Virginie J Clin Med Article Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual chronic pelvic pain (NMCPP) are symptoms that are probably underreported and neglected. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and overlapping relations between these symptoms among a general population of French women of reproductive age. A cross-sectional study among the nationwide CONSTANCES cohort study recruiting a representative sample of women within different French areas was constructed. Women aged 18–49 years (n = 21,287) who reported periods in the previous three months and experienced intercourse at least once were asked about prevalence of three types of chronic pelvic pain: mild, moderate and severe dysmenorrhea; dyspareunia assessed according to its frequency; NMCPP from a binary question. Between the start of 2012 through the end of 2017, 21,287 women were enrolled, 39.8% of them (95% confidence interval (CI), 39.2–40.5) reported moderate to severe dysmenorrhea; 20.3% (95% CI, 18.7–21.9) of the youngest group (18–24 years) reported severe dysmenorrhea. Dyspareunia was reported to happen often or always by 7.9% (95% CI, 7.5–8.2) and peaked among the youngest women at 12.8% (95% CI, 11.5–14.1). NMCPP was reported by 17.0% (95% CI, 16.5–17.5). Moreover, 7.5% (95% CI, 6.4–8.6) of the women reported two or more types of severe or frequent pain. More attention should be paid to this substantial proportion (7.5%) of French women of reproductive age who experience multiple, severe and frequent pelvic pain symptoms. MDPI 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8199870/ /pubmed/34205077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112481 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Margueritte, François
Fritel, Xavier
Zins, Marie
Goldberg, Marcel
Panjo, Henri
Fauconnier, Arnaud
Ringa, Virginie
The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France
title The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France
title_full The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France
title_fullStr The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France
title_full_unstemmed The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France
title_short The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France
title_sort underestimated prevalence of neglected chronic pelvic pain in women, a nationwide cross-sectional study in france
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205077
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112481
work_keys_str_mv AT marguerittefrancois theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT fritelxavier theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT zinsmarie theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT goldbergmarcel theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT panjohenri theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT fauconnierarnaud theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT ringavirginie theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT marguerittefrancois underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT fritelxavier underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT zinsmarie underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT goldbergmarcel underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT panjohenri underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT fauconnierarnaud underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance
AT ringavirginie underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance