Cargando…
The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France
Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual chronic pelvic pain (NMCPP) are symptoms that are probably underreported and neglected. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and overlapping relations between these symptoms among a general population of French women of reproductive age. A cross-sec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112481 |
_version_ | 1783707476847230976 |
---|---|
author | Margueritte, François Fritel, Xavier Zins, Marie Goldberg, Marcel Panjo, Henri Fauconnier, Arnaud Ringa, Virginie |
author_facet | Margueritte, François Fritel, Xavier Zins, Marie Goldberg, Marcel Panjo, Henri Fauconnier, Arnaud Ringa, Virginie |
author_sort | Margueritte, François |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual chronic pelvic pain (NMCPP) are symptoms that are probably underreported and neglected. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and overlapping relations between these symptoms among a general population of French women of reproductive age. A cross-sectional study among the nationwide CONSTANCES cohort study recruiting a representative sample of women within different French areas was constructed. Women aged 18–49 years (n = 21,287) who reported periods in the previous three months and experienced intercourse at least once were asked about prevalence of three types of chronic pelvic pain: mild, moderate and severe dysmenorrhea; dyspareunia assessed according to its frequency; NMCPP from a binary question. Between the start of 2012 through the end of 2017, 21,287 women were enrolled, 39.8% of them (95% confidence interval (CI), 39.2–40.5) reported moderate to severe dysmenorrhea; 20.3% (95% CI, 18.7–21.9) of the youngest group (18–24 years) reported severe dysmenorrhea. Dyspareunia was reported to happen often or always by 7.9% (95% CI, 7.5–8.2) and peaked among the youngest women at 12.8% (95% CI, 11.5–14.1). NMCPP was reported by 17.0% (95% CI, 16.5–17.5). Moreover, 7.5% (95% CI, 6.4–8.6) of the women reported two or more types of severe or frequent pain. More attention should be paid to this substantial proportion (7.5%) of French women of reproductive age who experience multiple, severe and frequent pelvic pain symptoms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8199870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81998702021-06-14 The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France Margueritte, François Fritel, Xavier Zins, Marie Goldberg, Marcel Panjo, Henri Fauconnier, Arnaud Ringa, Virginie J Clin Med Article Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual chronic pelvic pain (NMCPP) are symptoms that are probably underreported and neglected. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and overlapping relations between these symptoms among a general population of French women of reproductive age. A cross-sectional study among the nationwide CONSTANCES cohort study recruiting a representative sample of women within different French areas was constructed. Women aged 18–49 years (n = 21,287) who reported periods in the previous three months and experienced intercourse at least once were asked about prevalence of three types of chronic pelvic pain: mild, moderate and severe dysmenorrhea; dyspareunia assessed according to its frequency; NMCPP from a binary question. Between the start of 2012 through the end of 2017, 21,287 women were enrolled, 39.8% of them (95% confidence interval (CI), 39.2–40.5) reported moderate to severe dysmenorrhea; 20.3% (95% CI, 18.7–21.9) of the youngest group (18–24 years) reported severe dysmenorrhea. Dyspareunia was reported to happen often or always by 7.9% (95% CI, 7.5–8.2) and peaked among the youngest women at 12.8% (95% CI, 11.5–14.1). NMCPP was reported by 17.0% (95% CI, 16.5–17.5). Moreover, 7.5% (95% CI, 6.4–8.6) of the women reported two or more types of severe or frequent pain. More attention should be paid to this substantial proportion (7.5%) of French women of reproductive age who experience multiple, severe and frequent pelvic pain symptoms. MDPI 2021-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8199870/ /pubmed/34205077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112481 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Margueritte, François Fritel, Xavier Zins, Marie Goldberg, Marcel Panjo, Henri Fauconnier, Arnaud Ringa, Virginie The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France |
title | The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France |
title_full | The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France |
title_fullStr | The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France |
title_full_unstemmed | The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France |
title_short | The Underestimated Prevalence of Neglected Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women, a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in France |
title_sort | underestimated prevalence of neglected chronic pelvic pain in women, a nationwide cross-sectional study in france |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34205077 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112481 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marguerittefrancois theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT fritelxavier theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT zinsmarie theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT goldbergmarcel theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT panjohenri theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT fauconnierarnaud theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT ringavirginie theunderestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT marguerittefrancois underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT fritelxavier underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT zinsmarie underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT goldbergmarcel underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT panjohenri underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT fauconnierarnaud underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance AT ringavirginie underestimatedprevalenceofneglectedchronicpelvicpaininwomenanationwidecrosssectionalstudyinfrance |