Cargando…

An Analysis of the Vulnerability of Two Common Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation Techniques to Model Inversion Attacks

Recent research in computer vision has shown that original images used for training of deep learning models can be reconstructed using so-called inversion attacks. However, the feasibility of this attack type has not been investigated for complex 3D medical images. Thus, the aim of this study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Subbanna, Nagesh, Wilms, Matthias, Tuladhar, Anup, Forkert, Nils D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21113874
_version_ 1783707504779198464
author Subbanna, Nagesh
Wilms, Matthias
Tuladhar, Anup
Forkert, Nils D.
author_facet Subbanna, Nagesh
Wilms, Matthias
Tuladhar, Anup
Forkert, Nils D.
author_sort Subbanna, Nagesh
collection PubMed
description Recent research in computer vision has shown that original images used for training of deep learning models can be reconstructed using so-called inversion attacks. However, the feasibility of this attack type has not been investigated for complex 3D medical images. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the vulnerability of deep learning techniques used in medical imaging to model inversion attacks and investigate multiple quantitative metrics to evaluate the quality of the reconstructed images. For the development and evaluation of model inversion attacks, the public LPBA40 database consisting of 40 brain MRI scans with corresponding segmentations of the gyri and deep grey matter brain structures were used to train two popular deep convolutional neural networks, namely a U-Net and SegNet, and corresponding inversion decoders. Matthews correlation coefficient, the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and the magnitude of the deformation field resulting from non-linear registration of the original and reconstructed images were used to evaluate the reconstruction accuracy. A comparison of the similarity metrics revealed that the SSIM is best suited to evaluate the reconstruction accuray, followed closely by the magnitude of the deformation field. The quantitative evaluation of the reconstructed images revealed SSIM scores of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the U-Net and the SegNet, respectively. The qualitative evaluation showed that training images can be reconstructed with some degradation due to blurring but can be correctly matched to the original images in the majority of the cases. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that it is possible to reconstruct patient data used for training of convolutional neural networks and that the SSIM is a good metric to assess the reconstruction accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8199987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81999872021-06-14 An Analysis of the Vulnerability of Two Common Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation Techniques to Model Inversion Attacks Subbanna, Nagesh Wilms, Matthias Tuladhar, Anup Forkert, Nils D. Sensors (Basel) Article Recent research in computer vision has shown that original images used for training of deep learning models can be reconstructed using so-called inversion attacks. However, the feasibility of this attack type has not been investigated for complex 3D medical images. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the vulnerability of deep learning techniques used in medical imaging to model inversion attacks and investigate multiple quantitative metrics to evaluate the quality of the reconstructed images. For the development and evaluation of model inversion attacks, the public LPBA40 database consisting of 40 brain MRI scans with corresponding segmentations of the gyri and deep grey matter brain structures were used to train two popular deep convolutional neural networks, namely a U-Net and SegNet, and corresponding inversion decoders. Matthews correlation coefficient, the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and the magnitude of the deformation field resulting from non-linear registration of the original and reconstructed images were used to evaluate the reconstruction accuracy. A comparison of the similarity metrics revealed that the SSIM is best suited to evaluate the reconstruction accuray, followed closely by the magnitude of the deformation field. The quantitative evaluation of the reconstructed images revealed SSIM scores of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the U-Net and the SegNet, respectively. The qualitative evaluation showed that training images can be reconstructed with some degradation due to blurring but can be correctly matched to the original images in the majority of the cases. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that it is possible to reconstruct patient data used for training of convolutional neural networks and that the SSIM is a good metric to assess the reconstruction accuracy. MDPI 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8199987/ /pubmed/34199735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21113874 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Subbanna, Nagesh
Wilms, Matthias
Tuladhar, Anup
Forkert, Nils D.
An Analysis of the Vulnerability of Two Common Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation Techniques to Model Inversion Attacks
title An Analysis of the Vulnerability of Two Common Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation Techniques to Model Inversion Attacks
title_full An Analysis of the Vulnerability of Two Common Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation Techniques to Model Inversion Attacks
title_fullStr An Analysis of the Vulnerability of Two Common Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation Techniques to Model Inversion Attacks
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of the Vulnerability of Two Common Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation Techniques to Model Inversion Attacks
title_short An Analysis of the Vulnerability of Two Common Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation Techniques to Model Inversion Attacks
title_sort analysis of the vulnerability of two common deep learning-based medical image segmentation techniques to model inversion attacks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8199987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21113874
work_keys_str_mv AT subbannanagesh ananalysisofthevulnerabilityoftwocommondeeplearningbasedmedicalimagesegmentationtechniquestomodelinversionattacks
AT wilmsmatthias ananalysisofthevulnerabilityoftwocommondeeplearningbasedmedicalimagesegmentationtechniquestomodelinversionattacks
AT tuladharanup ananalysisofthevulnerabilityoftwocommondeeplearningbasedmedicalimagesegmentationtechniquestomodelinversionattacks
AT forkertnilsd ananalysisofthevulnerabilityoftwocommondeeplearningbasedmedicalimagesegmentationtechniquestomodelinversionattacks
AT subbannanagesh analysisofthevulnerabilityoftwocommondeeplearningbasedmedicalimagesegmentationtechniquestomodelinversionattacks
AT wilmsmatthias analysisofthevulnerabilityoftwocommondeeplearningbasedmedicalimagesegmentationtechniquestomodelinversionattacks
AT tuladharanup analysisofthevulnerabilityoftwocommondeeplearningbasedmedicalimagesegmentationtechniquestomodelinversionattacks
AT forkertnilsd analysisofthevulnerabilityoftwocommondeeplearningbasedmedicalimagesegmentationtechniquestomodelinversionattacks