Cargando…

Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials

The most common reactive material used for the construction of a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is zero valent iron (ZVI), however, its processing can generate corrosive effects that reduce the efficiency of the barrier. The present study makes a major contribution to understanding new reactive ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita, Molinari, Antonio, Cortina, José Luis, Gibert, Oriol, Ayora, Carlos, Tavolaro, Adalgisa, Rivera-Velásquez, María Fernanda, Fallico, Carmine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116075
_version_ 1783707555877355520
author Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita
Molinari, Antonio
Cortina, José Luis
Gibert, Oriol
Ayora, Carlos
Tavolaro, Adalgisa
Rivera-Velásquez, María Fernanda
Fallico, Carmine
author_facet Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita
Molinari, Antonio
Cortina, José Luis
Gibert, Oriol
Ayora, Carlos
Tavolaro, Adalgisa
Rivera-Velásquez, María Fernanda
Fallico, Carmine
author_sort Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita
collection PubMed
description The most common reactive material used for the construction of a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is zero valent iron (ZVI), however, its processing can generate corrosive effects that reduce the efficiency of the barrier. The present study makes a major contribution to understanding new reactive materials as natural and synthetic, easy to obtain, economical and environmentally friendly as possible substitutes for the traditional ZHV to be used as filters in the removal of three transition metals (Zn, Cu, Cd). To assess the ability to remove these pollutants, a series of batch and column tests were carried out at laboratory scale with these materials. Through BACH tests, four of seven substances with a removal percentage higher than 99% were prioritized (cabuya, natural clinoptilolite zeolites, sodium mordenite and mordenite). From this group of substances, column tests were performed where it is evidenced that cabuya fiber presents the lowest absorption time (≈189 h) while natural zeolite mordenite shows the highest time (≈833 h). The latter being the best option for the PRB design. The experimental values were also reproduced by the RETRASO code; through this program, the trend between the observed and simulated values with respect to the best reactive substance was corroborated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8200199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82001992021-06-14 Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita Molinari, Antonio Cortina, José Luis Gibert, Oriol Ayora, Carlos Tavolaro, Adalgisa Rivera-Velásquez, María Fernanda Fallico, Carmine Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The most common reactive material used for the construction of a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is zero valent iron (ZVI), however, its processing can generate corrosive effects that reduce the efficiency of the barrier. The present study makes a major contribution to understanding new reactive materials as natural and synthetic, easy to obtain, economical and environmentally friendly as possible substitutes for the traditional ZHV to be used as filters in the removal of three transition metals (Zn, Cu, Cd). To assess the ability to remove these pollutants, a series of batch and column tests were carried out at laboratory scale with these materials. Through BACH tests, four of seven substances with a removal percentage higher than 99% were prioritized (cabuya, natural clinoptilolite zeolites, sodium mordenite and mordenite). From this group of substances, column tests were performed where it is evidenced that cabuya fiber presents the lowest absorption time (≈189 h) while natural zeolite mordenite shows the highest time (≈833 h). The latter being the best option for the PRB design. The experimental values were also reproduced by the RETRASO code; through this program, the trend between the observed and simulated values with respect to the best reactive substance was corroborated. MDPI 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8200199/ /pubmed/34199945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116075 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita
Molinari, Antonio
Cortina, José Luis
Gibert, Oriol
Ayora, Carlos
Tavolaro, Adalgisa
Rivera-Velásquez, María Fernanda
Fallico, Carmine
Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials
title Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials
title_full Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials
title_fullStr Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials
title_full_unstemmed Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials
title_short Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials
title_sort removal of transition metals from contaminated aquifers by prb technology: performance comparison among reactive materials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116075
work_keys_str_mv AT mayacelarojasceliamargarita removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials
AT molinariantonio removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials
AT cortinajoseluis removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials
AT gibertoriol removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials
AT ayoracarlos removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials
AT tavolaroadalgisa removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials
AT riveravelasquezmariafernanda removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials
AT fallicocarmine removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials