Cargando…
Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials
The most common reactive material used for the construction of a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is zero valent iron (ZVI), however, its processing can generate corrosive effects that reduce the efficiency of the barrier. The present study makes a major contribution to understanding new reactive ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116075 |
_version_ | 1783707555877355520 |
---|---|
author | Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita Molinari, Antonio Cortina, José Luis Gibert, Oriol Ayora, Carlos Tavolaro, Adalgisa Rivera-Velásquez, María Fernanda Fallico, Carmine |
author_facet | Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita Molinari, Antonio Cortina, José Luis Gibert, Oriol Ayora, Carlos Tavolaro, Adalgisa Rivera-Velásquez, María Fernanda Fallico, Carmine |
author_sort | Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita |
collection | PubMed |
description | The most common reactive material used for the construction of a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is zero valent iron (ZVI), however, its processing can generate corrosive effects that reduce the efficiency of the barrier. The present study makes a major contribution to understanding new reactive materials as natural and synthetic, easy to obtain, economical and environmentally friendly as possible substitutes for the traditional ZHV to be used as filters in the removal of three transition metals (Zn, Cu, Cd). To assess the ability to remove these pollutants, a series of batch and column tests were carried out at laboratory scale with these materials. Through BACH tests, four of seven substances with a removal percentage higher than 99% were prioritized (cabuya, natural clinoptilolite zeolites, sodium mordenite and mordenite). From this group of substances, column tests were performed where it is evidenced that cabuya fiber presents the lowest absorption time (≈189 h) while natural zeolite mordenite shows the highest time (≈833 h). The latter being the best option for the PRB design. The experimental values were also reproduced by the RETRASO code; through this program, the trend between the observed and simulated values with respect to the best reactive substance was corroborated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8200199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82001992021-06-14 Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita Molinari, Antonio Cortina, José Luis Gibert, Oriol Ayora, Carlos Tavolaro, Adalgisa Rivera-Velásquez, María Fernanda Fallico, Carmine Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The most common reactive material used for the construction of a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is zero valent iron (ZVI), however, its processing can generate corrosive effects that reduce the efficiency of the barrier. The present study makes a major contribution to understanding new reactive materials as natural and synthetic, easy to obtain, economical and environmentally friendly as possible substitutes for the traditional ZHV to be used as filters in the removal of three transition metals (Zn, Cu, Cd). To assess the ability to remove these pollutants, a series of batch and column tests were carried out at laboratory scale with these materials. Through BACH tests, four of seven substances with a removal percentage higher than 99% were prioritized (cabuya, natural clinoptilolite zeolites, sodium mordenite and mordenite). From this group of substances, column tests were performed where it is evidenced that cabuya fiber presents the lowest absorption time (≈189 h) while natural zeolite mordenite shows the highest time (≈833 h). The latter being the best option for the PRB design. The experimental values were also reproduced by the RETRASO code; through this program, the trend between the observed and simulated values with respect to the best reactive substance was corroborated. MDPI 2021-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8200199/ /pubmed/34199945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116075 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mayacela-Rojas, Celia Margarita Molinari, Antonio Cortina, José Luis Gibert, Oriol Ayora, Carlos Tavolaro, Adalgisa Rivera-Velásquez, María Fernanda Fallico, Carmine Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials |
title | Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials |
title_full | Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials |
title_fullStr | Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials |
title_short | Removal of Transition Metals from Contaminated Aquifers by PRB Technology: Performance Comparison among Reactive Materials |
title_sort | removal of transition metals from contaminated aquifers by prb technology: performance comparison among reactive materials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34199945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mayacelarojasceliamargarita removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials AT molinariantonio removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials AT cortinajoseluis removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials AT gibertoriol removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials AT ayoracarlos removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials AT tavolaroadalgisa removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials AT riveravelasquezmariafernanda removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials AT fallicocarmine removaloftransitionmetalsfromcontaminatedaquifersbyprbtechnologyperformancecomparisonamongreactivematerials |