Cargando…
Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures
A method for estimating peak skin dose (PSD) from CTDI(vol) has been published but not validated. The objective of this study was to validate this method during CT‐guided ablation procedures. Radiochromic film was calibrated and used to measure PSD. Sixty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33955655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13261 |
_version_ | 1783707600408281088 |
---|---|
author | Jones, A. Kyle Kisiel, Meghan E. Rong, X. John Tam, Alda L. |
author_facet | Jones, A. Kyle Kisiel, Meghan E. Rong, X. John Tam, Alda L. |
author_sort | Jones, A. Kyle |
collection | PubMed |
description | A method for estimating peak skin dose (PSD) from CTDI(vol) has been published but not validated. The objective of this study was to validate this method during CT‐guided ablation procedures. Radiochromic film was calibrated and used to measure PSD. Sixty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study, and measured PSD were collected for 46 procedures. CTDI(vol) stratified by axial and helical scanning was used to calculate an estimate of PSD using the method [1.2 × CTDI(vol)(helical) + 0.6 × CTDI(vol)(axial)], and both calculated PSD and total CTDI(vol) were compared to measured PSD using paired t‐tests on the log‐transformed data and Bland‐Altman analysis. Calculated PSD were significantly different from measured PSD (P < 0.0001, bias, 18.3%, 95% limits of agreement, −63.0% to 26.4%). Measured PSD were not significantly different from total CTDI(vol) (P = 0.27, bias, 3.97%, 95% limits of agreement, −51.6% to 43.7%). Considering that CTDI(vol) is reported on the console of all CT scanners, is not stratified by axial and helical scanning modes, and is immediately available to the operator during CT‐guided interventional procedures, it may be reasonable to use the scanner‐reported CTDI(vol) as an indicator of PSD during CT‐guided procedures. However, further validation is required for other models of CT scanner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8200428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82004282021-06-15 Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures Jones, A. Kyle Kisiel, Meghan E. Rong, X. John Tam, Alda L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging A method for estimating peak skin dose (PSD) from CTDI(vol) has been published but not validated. The objective of this study was to validate this method during CT‐guided ablation procedures. Radiochromic film was calibrated and used to measure PSD. Sixty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study, and measured PSD were collected for 46 procedures. CTDI(vol) stratified by axial and helical scanning was used to calculate an estimate of PSD using the method [1.2 × CTDI(vol)(helical) + 0.6 × CTDI(vol)(axial)], and both calculated PSD and total CTDI(vol) were compared to measured PSD using paired t‐tests on the log‐transformed data and Bland‐Altman analysis. Calculated PSD were significantly different from measured PSD (P < 0.0001, bias, 18.3%, 95% limits of agreement, −63.0% to 26.4%). Measured PSD were not significantly different from total CTDI(vol) (P = 0.27, bias, 3.97%, 95% limits of agreement, −51.6% to 43.7%). Considering that CTDI(vol) is reported on the console of all CT scanners, is not stratified by axial and helical scanning modes, and is immediately available to the operator during CT‐guided interventional procedures, it may be reasonable to use the scanner‐reported CTDI(vol) as an indicator of PSD during CT‐guided procedures. However, further validation is required for other models of CT scanner. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8200428/ /pubmed/33955655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13261 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Jones, A. Kyle Kisiel, Meghan E. Rong, X. John Tam, Alda L. Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures |
title | Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures |
title_full | Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures |
title_fullStr | Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures |
title_short | Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures |
title_sort | validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from ct‐guided procedures |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33955655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesakyle validationofamethodforestimatingpeakskindosefromctguidedprocedures AT kisielmeghane validationofamethodforestimatingpeakskindosefromctguidedprocedures AT rongxjohn validationofamethodforestimatingpeakskindosefromctguidedprocedures AT tamaldal validationofamethodforestimatingpeakskindosefromctguidedprocedures |