Cargando…

Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures

A method for estimating peak skin dose (PSD) from CTDI(vol) has been published but not validated. The objective of this study was to validate this method during CT‐guided ablation procedures. Radiochromic film was calibrated and used to measure PSD. Sixty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, A. Kyle, Kisiel, Meghan E., Rong, X. John, Tam, Alda L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33955655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13261
_version_ 1783707600408281088
author Jones, A. Kyle
Kisiel, Meghan E.
Rong, X. John
Tam, Alda L.
author_facet Jones, A. Kyle
Kisiel, Meghan E.
Rong, X. John
Tam, Alda L.
author_sort Jones, A. Kyle
collection PubMed
description A method for estimating peak skin dose (PSD) from CTDI(vol) has been published but not validated. The objective of this study was to validate this method during CT‐guided ablation procedures. Radiochromic film was calibrated and used to measure PSD. Sixty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study, and measured PSD were collected for 46 procedures. CTDI(vol) stratified by axial and helical scanning was used to calculate an estimate of PSD using the method [1.2 × CTDI(vol)(helical) + 0.6 × CTDI(vol)(axial)], and both calculated PSD and total CTDI(vol) were compared to measured PSD using paired t‐tests on the log‐transformed data and Bland‐Altman analysis. Calculated PSD were significantly different from measured PSD (P < 0.0001, bias, 18.3%, 95% limits of agreement, −63.0% to 26.4%). Measured PSD were not significantly different from total CTDI(vol) (P = 0.27, bias, 3.97%, 95% limits of agreement, −51.6% to 43.7%). Considering that CTDI(vol) is reported on the console of all CT scanners, is not stratified by axial and helical scanning modes, and is immediately available to the operator during CT‐guided interventional procedures, it may be reasonable to use the scanner‐reported CTDI(vol) as an indicator of PSD during CT‐guided procedures. However, further validation is required for other models of CT scanner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8200428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82004282021-06-15 Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures Jones, A. Kyle Kisiel, Meghan E. Rong, X. John Tam, Alda L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging A method for estimating peak skin dose (PSD) from CTDI(vol) has been published but not validated. The objective of this study was to validate this method during CT‐guided ablation procedures. Radiochromic film was calibrated and used to measure PSD. Sixty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study, and measured PSD were collected for 46 procedures. CTDI(vol) stratified by axial and helical scanning was used to calculate an estimate of PSD using the method [1.2 × CTDI(vol)(helical) + 0.6 × CTDI(vol)(axial)], and both calculated PSD and total CTDI(vol) were compared to measured PSD using paired t‐tests on the log‐transformed data and Bland‐Altman analysis. Calculated PSD were significantly different from measured PSD (P < 0.0001, bias, 18.3%, 95% limits of agreement, −63.0% to 26.4%). Measured PSD were not significantly different from total CTDI(vol) (P = 0.27, bias, 3.97%, 95% limits of agreement, −51.6% to 43.7%). Considering that CTDI(vol) is reported on the console of all CT scanners, is not stratified by axial and helical scanning modes, and is immediately available to the operator during CT‐guided interventional procedures, it may be reasonable to use the scanner‐reported CTDI(vol) as an indicator of PSD during CT‐guided procedures. However, further validation is required for other models of CT scanner. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8200428/ /pubmed/33955655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13261 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Jones, A. Kyle
Kisiel, Meghan E.
Rong, X. John
Tam, Alda L.
Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures
title Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures
title_full Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures
title_fullStr Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures
title_short Validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from CT‐guided procedures
title_sort validation of a method for estimating peak skin dose from ct‐guided procedures
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33955655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13261
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesakyle validationofamethodforestimatingpeakskindosefromctguidedprocedures
AT kisielmeghane validationofamethodforestimatingpeakskindosefromctguidedprocedures
AT rongxjohn validationofamethodforestimatingpeakskindosefromctguidedprocedures
AT tamaldal validationofamethodforestimatingpeakskindosefromctguidedprocedures