Cargando…

Dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: The Importance of the six degree couch

PURPOSE: Single isocenter technique (SIT) for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is feasible. However, SIT introduces the potential for rotational error which can lead to geographical miss. Additional planning treatment volume (PTV) margin is required when using SIT. With the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amaya, Dania, Shinde, Ashwin, Wohlers, Christopher, Wong, Ka Chun Carson, Novak, Jennifer, Neylon, John, Han, Chunhui, Liu, An, Dandapani, Savita, Glaser, Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34021698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13286
_version_ 1783707603750092800
author Amaya, Dania
Shinde, Ashwin
Wohlers, Christopher
Wong, Ka Chun Carson
Novak, Jennifer
Neylon, John
Han, Chunhui
Liu, An
Dandapani, Savita
Glaser, Scott
author_facet Amaya, Dania
Shinde, Ashwin
Wohlers, Christopher
Wong, Ka Chun Carson
Novak, Jennifer
Neylon, John
Han, Chunhui
Liu, An
Dandapani, Savita
Glaser, Scott
author_sort Amaya, Dania
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Single isocenter technique (SIT) for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is feasible. However, SIT introduces the potential for rotational error which can lead to geographical miss. Additional planning treatment volume (PTV) margin is required when using SIT. With the six degrees of freedom (6DoF) couch, rotational error can be minimized. We sought to evaluate the effect of the 6DoF couch on the dosimetry of patients with multiple brain metastases treated with SIT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten consecutive patients treated with SRS to ≥3 metastases were identified. Original treatments had MIT plans (MITP). The lesions were replanned using SIT. Lesions 5‐10 cm from isocenter had an additional 1mm of margin. Patients were replanned with these additional margins to account for inability to correct rotational error (SITPM). Multiple dosimetric variables and time metrics were evaluated. Dosimetry planning time (DPT) and patient treatment time (PTT) were evaluated. Statistics were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. RESULTS: A total of 73 brain metastases receiving SRS, to a median of 6 lesions per patient, were identified. MITPs treated 73 lesions with 63 isocenters. On average, MITPs had a 19.2% higher brain V12 than SITPs (P = 0.017). For creation of SITPM, 30 lesions required 1 mm of additional margin, while none required 2 mm of margin. This increased V12 by 47.8% on average per patient (P = 0.008) from SITP to SITPM. DPT was 5.5 hours for SITP, while median for MITP was 12.5 hours (P = 0.005) PTT was 30 minutes for SITP, while median for MITP was 144 minutes (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SITPs are comparable to MITPs if rotational error can be corrected with the use of a 6DoF couch. Increasing margin to account for rotational error leads to a nearly 50% increase in V12, which could result in higher rates of radiation necrosis. Time savings are significant using SIT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8200442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82004422021-06-15 Dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: The Importance of the six degree couch Amaya, Dania Shinde, Ashwin Wohlers, Christopher Wong, Ka Chun Carson Novak, Jennifer Neylon, John Han, Chunhui Liu, An Dandapani, Savita Glaser, Scott J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Single isocenter technique (SIT) for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is feasible. However, SIT introduces the potential for rotational error which can lead to geographical miss. Additional planning treatment volume (PTV) margin is required when using SIT. With the six degrees of freedom (6DoF) couch, rotational error can be minimized. We sought to evaluate the effect of the 6DoF couch on the dosimetry of patients with multiple brain metastases treated with SIT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten consecutive patients treated with SRS to ≥3 metastases were identified. Original treatments had MIT plans (MITP). The lesions were replanned using SIT. Lesions 5‐10 cm from isocenter had an additional 1mm of margin. Patients were replanned with these additional margins to account for inability to correct rotational error (SITPM). Multiple dosimetric variables and time metrics were evaluated. Dosimetry planning time (DPT) and patient treatment time (PTT) were evaluated. Statistics were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank test. RESULTS: A total of 73 brain metastases receiving SRS, to a median of 6 lesions per patient, were identified. MITPs treated 73 lesions with 63 isocenters. On average, MITPs had a 19.2% higher brain V12 than SITPs (P = 0.017). For creation of SITPM, 30 lesions required 1 mm of additional margin, while none required 2 mm of margin. This increased V12 by 47.8% on average per patient (P = 0.008) from SITP to SITPM. DPT was 5.5 hours for SITP, while median for MITP was 12.5 hours (P = 0.005) PTT was 30 minutes for SITP, while median for MITP was 144 minutes (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SITPs are comparable to MITPs if rotational error can be corrected with the use of a 6DoF couch. Increasing margin to account for rotational error leads to a nearly 50% increase in V12, which could result in higher rates of radiation necrosis. Time savings are significant using SIT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8200442/ /pubmed/34021698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13286 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Amaya, Dania
Shinde, Ashwin
Wohlers, Christopher
Wong, Ka Chun Carson
Novak, Jennifer
Neylon, John
Han, Chunhui
Liu, An
Dandapani, Savita
Glaser, Scott
Dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: The Importance of the six degree couch
title Dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: The Importance of the six degree couch
title_full Dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: The Importance of the six degree couch
title_fullStr Dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: The Importance of the six degree couch
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: The Importance of the six degree couch
title_short Dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: The Importance of the six degree couch
title_sort dosimetric comparison of multiple vs single isocenter technique for linear accelerator‐based stereotactic radiosurgery: the importance of the six degree couch
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34021698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13286
work_keys_str_mv AT amayadania dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch
AT shindeashwin dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch
AT wohlerschristopher dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch
AT wongkachuncarson dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch
AT novakjennifer dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch
AT neylonjohn dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch
AT hanchunhui dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch
AT liuan dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch
AT dandapanisavita dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch
AT glaserscott dosimetriccomparisonofmultiplevssingleisocentertechniqueforlinearacceleratorbasedstereotacticradiosurgerytheimportanceofthesixdegreecouch