Cargando…

On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement

The main focus of the recommended spatial accuracy tests for the multi‐leaf collimators (MLC) is calibration of the leaf position along the movement direction and overall alignment to the radiation isocenter. No explicit attention was typically paid to the alignment of the leaves from the opposing b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Latifi, Kujtim, Lotey, Rajiv, Feygelman, Vladimir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13267
_version_ 1783707617082736640
author Latifi, Kujtim
Lotey, Rajiv
Feygelman, Vladimir
author_facet Latifi, Kujtim
Lotey, Rajiv
Feygelman, Vladimir
author_sort Latifi, Kujtim
collection PubMed
description The main focus of the recommended spatial accuracy tests for the multi‐leaf collimators (MLC) is calibration of the leaf position along the movement direction and overall alignment to the radiation isocenter. No explicit attention was typically paid to the alignment of the leaves from the opposing banks in the direction orthogonal to movement. This paper is a case study demonstrating that verification of such alignment at the time of acceptance testing is prudent. The original standard MLC (SMLC) on an MRIdian MRI‐guided linac (ViewRay Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) was upgraded to a high‐speed MLC (HSMLC), which is supposed to be mechanically identical to the SMLC except for the higher drive screw pitch. The results of the end‐to‐end IMRT tests demonstrated unacceptable dosimetric results exemplified by an average and maximum ion chamber (IC) point dose error in the high‐dose low‐gradient region of 2.5 ± 1.4% and 4.6%, respectively. Before the upgrade, those values were 0.3 ± 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively. An exhaustive analysis of possible failure modes eventually zeroed in on the average misalignment of about 1 mm in the Y (along the couch) direction between the right and left upper MLC banks. The MLC was replaced, reducing the Y‐direction misalignment to 0.4 mm. As a result, the average and maximum IC dose‐errors became acceptable 1.0 ± 0.7% and 1.6%, respectively. Simple film and/or chamber array tests during acceptance testing can easily detect Y‐direction misalignments between opposing leaves banks measuring a fraction of a mm at isocenter. Left undetected, such misalignment can cause nontrivial dosimetric consequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8200498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82004982021-06-15 On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement Latifi, Kujtim Lotey, Rajiv Feygelman, Vladimir J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes The main focus of the recommended spatial accuracy tests for the multi‐leaf collimators (MLC) is calibration of the leaf position along the movement direction and overall alignment to the radiation isocenter. No explicit attention was typically paid to the alignment of the leaves from the opposing banks in the direction orthogonal to movement. This paper is a case study demonstrating that verification of such alignment at the time of acceptance testing is prudent. The original standard MLC (SMLC) on an MRIdian MRI‐guided linac (ViewRay Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) was upgraded to a high‐speed MLC (HSMLC), which is supposed to be mechanically identical to the SMLC except for the higher drive screw pitch. The results of the end‐to‐end IMRT tests demonstrated unacceptable dosimetric results exemplified by an average and maximum ion chamber (IC) point dose error in the high‐dose low‐gradient region of 2.5 ± 1.4% and 4.6%, respectively. Before the upgrade, those values were 0.3 ± 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively. An exhaustive analysis of possible failure modes eventually zeroed in on the average misalignment of about 1 mm in the Y (along the couch) direction between the right and left upper MLC banks. The MLC was replaced, reducing the Y‐direction misalignment to 0.4 mm. As a result, the average and maximum IC dose‐errors became acceptable 1.0 ± 0.7% and 1.6%, respectively. Simple film and/or chamber array tests during acceptance testing can easily detect Y‐direction misalignments between opposing leaves banks measuring a fraction of a mm at isocenter. Left undetected, such misalignment can cause nontrivial dosimetric consequences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8200498/ /pubmed/34056837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13267 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Latifi, Kujtim
Lotey, Rajiv
Feygelman, Vladimir
On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement
title On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement
title_full On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement
title_fullStr On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement
title_full_unstemmed On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement
title_short On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement
title_sort on the mlc leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13267
work_keys_str_mv AT latifikujtim onthemlcleavesalignmentinthedirectionorthogonaltomovement
AT loteyrajiv onthemlcleavesalignmentinthedirectionorthogonaltomovement
AT feygelmanvladimir onthemlcleavesalignmentinthedirectionorthogonaltomovement