Cargando…
On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement
The main focus of the recommended spatial accuracy tests for the multi‐leaf collimators (MLC) is calibration of the leaf position along the movement direction and overall alignment to the radiation isocenter. No explicit attention was typically paid to the alignment of the leaves from the opposing b...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13267 |
_version_ | 1783707617082736640 |
---|---|
author | Latifi, Kujtim Lotey, Rajiv Feygelman, Vladimir |
author_facet | Latifi, Kujtim Lotey, Rajiv Feygelman, Vladimir |
author_sort | Latifi, Kujtim |
collection | PubMed |
description | The main focus of the recommended spatial accuracy tests for the multi‐leaf collimators (MLC) is calibration of the leaf position along the movement direction and overall alignment to the radiation isocenter. No explicit attention was typically paid to the alignment of the leaves from the opposing banks in the direction orthogonal to movement. This paper is a case study demonstrating that verification of such alignment at the time of acceptance testing is prudent. The original standard MLC (SMLC) on an MRIdian MRI‐guided linac (ViewRay Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) was upgraded to a high‐speed MLC (HSMLC), which is supposed to be mechanically identical to the SMLC except for the higher drive screw pitch. The results of the end‐to‐end IMRT tests demonstrated unacceptable dosimetric results exemplified by an average and maximum ion chamber (IC) point dose error in the high‐dose low‐gradient region of 2.5 ± 1.4% and 4.6%, respectively. Before the upgrade, those values were 0.3 ± 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively. An exhaustive analysis of possible failure modes eventually zeroed in on the average misalignment of about 1 mm in the Y (along the couch) direction between the right and left upper MLC banks. The MLC was replaced, reducing the Y‐direction misalignment to 0.4 mm. As a result, the average and maximum IC dose‐errors became acceptable 1.0 ± 0.7% and 1.6%, respectively. Simple film and/or chamber array tests during acceptance testing can easily detect Y‐direction misalignments between opposing leaves banks measuring a fraction of a mm at isocenter. Left undetected, such misalignment can cause nontrivial dosimetric consequences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8200498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82004982021-06-15 On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement Latifi, Kujtim Lotey, Rajiv Feygelman, Vladimir J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes The main focus of the recommended spatial accuracy tests for the multi‐leaf collimators (MLC) is calibration of the leaf position along the movement direction and overall alignment to the radiation isocenter. No explicit attention was typically paid to the alignment of the leaves from the opposing banks in the direction orthogonal to movement. This paper is a case study demonstrating that verification of such alignment at the time of acceptance testing is prudent. The original standard MLC (SMLC) on an MRIdian MRI‐guided linac (ViewRay Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) was upgraded to a high‐speed MLC (HSMLC), which is supposed to be mechanically identical to the SMLC except for the higher drive screw pitch. The results of the end‐to‐end IMRT tests demonstrated unacceptable dosimetric results exemplified by an average and maximum ion chamber (IC) point dose error in the high‐dose low‐gradient region of 2.5 ± 1.4% and 4.6%, respectively. Before the upgrade, those values were 0.3 ± 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively. An exhaustive analysis of possible failure modes eventually zeroed in on the average misalignment of about 1 mm in the Y (along the couch) direction between the right and left upper MLC banks. The MLC was replaced, reducing the Y‐direction misalignment to 0.4 mm. As a result, the average and maximum IC dose‐errors became acceptable 1.0 ± 0.7% and 1.6%, respectively. Simple film and/or chamber array tests during acceptance testing can easily detect Y‐direction misalignments between opposing leaves banks measuring a fraction of a mm at isocenter. Left undetected, such misalignment can cause nontrivial dosimetric consequences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8200498/ /pubmed/34056837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13267 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Latifi, Kujtim Lotey, Rajiv Feygelman, Vladimir On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement |
title | On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement |
title_full | On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement |
title_fullStr | On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement |
title_full_unstemmed | On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement |
title_short | On the MLC leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement |
title_sort | on the mlc leaves alignment in the direction orthogonal to movement |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT latifikujtim onthemlcleavesalignmentinthedirectionorthogonaltomovement AT loteyrajiv onthemlcleavesalignmentinthedirectionorthogonaltomovement AT feygelmanvladimir onthemlcleavesalignmentinthedirectionorthogonaltomovement |