Cargando…
Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water
A systematic bias in TomoTherapy output calibration was reported by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston (IROC‐H) after analyzing intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) credentialing results from hundreds of TomoTherapy units. Multiple theories were developed to explain this observa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13311 |
_version_ | 1783707620120461312 |
---|---|
author | Pang, Tingtian Yang, Bo Liu, Xia Castle, James R. Yu, Lang Liu, Nan Li, Wenbo Dong, Tingting Qiu, Jie Chen, Quan |
author_facet | Pang, Tingtian Yang, Bo Liu, Xia Castle, James R. Yu, Lang Liu, Nan Li, Wenbo Dong, Tingting Qiu, Jie Chen, Quan |
author_sort | Pang, Tingtian |
collection | PubMed |
description | A systematic bias in TomoTherapy output calibration was reported by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston (IROC‐H) after analyzing intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) credentialing results from hundreds of TomoTherapy units. Multiple theories were developed to explain this observation. One theory was that the use of a solid water “cheese” phantom instead of real water in the calibration measurement was the culprit. A phantom filled with distilled water was built to investigate whether our TomoTherapy was miscalibrated due to the use of a solid water phantom. A miscalibration of −1.47% was detected on our TomoTherapy unit. It is found that despite following the vendor's updated recommendation on computed tomography (CT) number to density calibration, the cheese phantom was still mapped to a density of 1.028 g/cm(3), rather than the 1.01 g/cm(3) value reported in literature. When the density of the cheese phantom was modified to 1.01 g/cm(3) in the treatment planning system, the measurement also indicated that our TomoTherapy machine was miscalibrated by −1.52%, agreeing with the real water phantom findings. Our single‐institution finding showed that the cheese phantom density assignment can introduce greater than 1% errors in the TomoTherapy absolute dose calibration. It is recommended that the absolute dose calibration for TomoTherapy be performed either in real water or in the cheese phantom with the density in TPS overridden as 1.01 g/cm(3). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8200510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82005102021-06-15 Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water Pang, Tingtian Yang, Bo Liu, Xia Castle, James R. Yu, Lang Liu, Nan Li, Wenbo Dong, Tingting Qiu, Jie Chen, Quan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A systematic bias in TomoTherapy output calibration was reported by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston (IROC‐H) after analyzing intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) credentialing results from hundreds of TomoTherapy units. Multiple theories were developed to explain this observation. One theory was that the use of a solid water “cheese” phantom instead of real water in the calibration measurement was the culprit. A phantom filled with distilled water was built to investigate whether our TomoTherapy was miscalibrated due to the use of a solid water phantom. A miscalibration of −1.47% was detected on our TomoTherapy unit. It is found that despite following the vendor's updated recommendation on computed tomography (CT) number to density calibration, the cheese phantom was still mapped to a density of 1.028 g/cm(3), rather than the 1.01 g/cm(3) value reported in literature. When the density of the cheese phantom was modified to 1.01 g/cm(3) in the treatment planning system, the measurement also indicated that our TomoTherapy machine was miscalibrated by −1.52%, agreeing with the real water phantom findings. Our single‐institution finding showed that the cheese phantom density assignment can introduce greater than 1% errors in the TomoTherapy absolute dose calibration. It is recommended that the absolute dose calibration for TomoTherapy be performed either in real water or in the cheese phantom with the density in TPS overridden as 1.01 g/cm(3). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8200510/ /pubmed/34060222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13311 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Pang, Tingtian Yang, Bo Liu, Xia Castle, James R. Yu, Lang Liu, Nan Li, Wenbo Dong, Tingting Qiu, Jie Chen, Quan Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water |
title | Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water |
title_full | Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water |
title_fullStr | Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water |
title_short | Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water |
title_sort | investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for tomotherapy using real water |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13311 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pangtingtian investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater AT yangbo investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater AT liuxia investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater AT castlejamesr investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater AT yulang investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater AT liunan investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater AT liwenbo investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater AT dongtingting investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater AT qiujie investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater AT chenquan investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater |