Cargando…

Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water

A systematic bias in TomoTherapy output calibration was reported by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston (IROC‐H) after analyzing intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) credentialing results from hundreds of TomoTherapy units. Multiple theories were developed to explain this observa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pang, Tingtian, Yang, Bo, Liu, Xia, Castle, James R., Yu, Lang, Liu, Nan, Li, Wenbo, Dong, Tingting, Qiu, Jie, Chen, Quan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13311
_version_ 1783707620120461312
author Pang, Tingtian
Yang, Bo
Liu, Xia
Castle, James R.
Yu, Lang
Liu, Nan
Li, Wenbo
Dong, Tingting
Qiu, Jie
Chen, Quan
author_facet Pang, Tingtian
Yang, Bo
Liu, Xia
Castle, James R.
Yu, Lang
Liu, Nan
Li, Wenbo
Dong, Tingting
Qiu, Jie
Chen, Quan
author_sort Pang, Tingtian
collection PubMed
description A systematic bias in TomoTherapy output calibration was reported by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston (IROC‐H) after analyzing intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) credentialing results from hundreds of TomoTherapy units. Multiple theories were developed to explain this observation. One theory was that the use of a solid water “cheese” phantom instead of real water in the calibration measurement was the culprit. A phantom filled with distilled water was built to investigate whether our TomoTherapy was miscalibrated due to the use of a solid water phantom. A miscalibration of −1.47% was detected on our TomoTherapy unit. It is found that despite following the vendor's updated recommendation on computed tomography (CT) number to density calibration, the cheese phantom was still mapped to a density of 1.028 g/cm(3), rather than the 1.01 g/cm(3) value reported in literature. When the density of the cheese phantom was modified to 1.01 g/cm(3) in the treatment planning system, the measurement also indicated that our TomoTherapy machine was miscalibrated by −1.52%, agreeing with the real water phantom findings. Our single‐institution finding showed that the cheese phantom density assignment can introduce greater than 1% errors in the TomoTherapy absolute dose calibration. It is recommended that the absolute dose calibration for TomoTherapy be performed either in real water or in the cheese phantom with the density in TPS overridden as 1.01 g/cm(3).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8200510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82005102021-06-15 Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water Pang, Tingtian Yang, Bo Liu, Xia Castle, James R. Yu, Lang Liu, Nan Li, Wenbo Dong, Tingting Qiu, Jie Chen, Quan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics A systematic bias in TomoTherapy output calibration was reported by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston (IROC‐H) after analyzing intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) credentialing results from hundreds of TomoTherapy units. Multiple theories were developed to explain this observation. One theory was that the use of a solid water “cheese” phantom instead of real water in the calibration measurement was the culprit. A phantom filled with distilled water was built to investigate whether our TomoTherapy was miscalibrated due to the use of a solid water phantom. A miscalibration of −1.47% was detected on our TomoTherapy unit. It is found that despite following the vendor's updated recommendation on computed tomography (CT) number to density calibration, the cheese phantom was still mapped to a density of 1.028 g/cm(3), rather than the 1.01 g/cm(3) value reported in literature. When the density of the cheese phantom was modified to 1.01 g/cm(3) in the treatment planning system, the measurement also indicated that our TomoTherapy machine was miscalibrated by −1.52%, agreeing with the real water phantom findings. Our single‐institution finding showed that the cheese phantom density assignment can introduce greater than 1% errors in the TomoTherapy absolute dose calibration. It is recommended that the absolute dose calibration for TomoTherapy be performed either in real water or in the cheese phantom with the density in TPS overridden as 1.01 g/cm(3). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8200510/ /pubmed/34060222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13311 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Pang, Tingtian
Yang, Bo
Liu, Xia
Castle, James R.
Yu, Lang
Liu, Nan
Li, Wenbo
Dong, Tingting
Qiu, Jie
Chen, Quan
Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water
title Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water
title_full Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water
title_fullStr Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water
title_short Investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for TomoTherapy using real water
title_sort investigation of absolute dose calibration accuracy for tomotherapy using real water
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34060222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13311
work_keys_str_mv AT pangtingtian investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater
AT yangbo investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater
AT liuxia investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater
AT castlejamesr investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater
AT yulang investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater
AT liunan investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater
AT liwenbo investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater
AT dongtingting investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater
AT qiujie investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater
AT chenquan investigationofabsolutedosecalibrationaccuracyfortomotherapyusingrealwater