Cargando…

Optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the AcurosXB algorithm for VMAT treatment planning

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide and test a new methodology to adjust the AcurosXB beam model for VMAT treatment plans. METHOD: The effective target spot size of the AcurosXB v15 algorithm was adjusted in order to minimize the difference between calculated and measured penumbras. The dos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Passal, V., Barreau, M., Tiplica, T., Dufreneix, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13256
_version_ 1783707620611194880
author Passal, V.
Barreau, M.
Tiplica, T.
Dufreneix, S.
author_facet Passal, V.
Barreau, M.
Tiplica, T.
Dufreneix, S.
author_sort Passal, V.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide and test a new methodology to adjust the AcurosXB beam model for VMAT treatment plans. METHOD: The effective target spot size of the AcurosXB v15 algorithm was adjusted in order to minimize the difference between calculated and measured penumbras. The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was adjusted using the asynchronous oscillating sweeping gap tests defined in the literature and the MLC transmission was measured. The impact of the four parameters on the small field output factors was assessed using a design of experiment methodology. Patient quality controls were performed for the three beam models investigated including two energies and two MLC models. RESULTS: Effective target spot sizes differed from the manufacturer recommendations and strongly depended on the MLC model considered. DLG values ranged from 0.7 to 2.3 mm and were found to be larger than the ones based on the sweeping gap tests. All parameters were found to significantly influence the calculated output factors, especially for the 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm field size. Interactions were also identified for fields smaller than 2 cm × 2 cm, suggesting that adjusting the parameters on the small field output factors should be done with caution. All patient quality controls passed the universal action limit of 90%. CONCLUSION: The methodology provided is simple to implement in clinical practice. It was validated for three beam models covering a large variety of treatment types and localizations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8200512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82005122021-06-15 Optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the AcurosXB algorithm for VMAT treatment planning Passal, V. Barreau, M. Tiplica, T. Dufreneix, S. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to provide and test a new methodology to adjust the AcurosXB beam model for VMAT treatment plans. METHOD: The effective target spot size of the AcurosXB v15 algorithm was adjusted in order to minimize the difference between calculated and measured penumbras. The dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) was adjusted using the asynchronous oscillating sweeping gap tests defined in the literature and the MLC transmission was measured. The impact of the four parameters on the small field output factors was assessed using a design of experiment methodology. Patient quality controls were performed for the three beam models investigated including two energies and two MLC models. RESULTS: Effective target spot sizes differed from the manufacturer recommendations and strongly depended on the MLC model considered. DLG values ranged from 0.7 to 2.3 mm and were found to be larger than the ones based on the sweeping gap tests. All parameters were found to significantly influence the calculated output factors, especially for the 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm field size. Interactions were also identified for fields smaller than 2 cm × 2 cm, suggesting that adjusting the parameters on the small field output factors should be done with caution. All patient quality controls passed the universal action limit of 90%. CONCLUSION: The methodology provided is simple to implement in clinical practice. It was validated for three beam models covering a large variety of treatment types and localizations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8200512/ /pubmed/34042259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13256 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Passal, V.
Barreau, M.
Tiplica, T.
Dufreneix, S.
Optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the AcurosXB algorithm for VMAT treatment planning
title Optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the AcurosXB algorithm for VMAT treatment planning
title_full Optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the AcurosXB algorithm for VMAT treatment planning
title_fullStr Optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the AcurosXB algorithm for VMAT treatment planning
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the AcurosXB algorithm for VMAT treatment planning
title_short Optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the AcurosXB algorithm for VMAT treatment planning
title_sort optimizing the effective spot size and the dosimetric leaf gap of the acurosxb algorithm for vmat treatment planning
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34042259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13256
work_keys_str_mv AT passalv optimizingtheeffectivespotsizeandthedosimetricleafgapoftheacurosxbalgorithmforvmattreatmentplanning
AT barreaum optimizingtheeffectivespotsizeandthedosimetricleafgapoftheacurosxbalgorithmforvmattreatmentplanning
AT tiplicat optimizingtheeffectivespotsizeandthedosimetricleafgapoftheacurosxbalgorithmforvmattreatmentplanning
AT dufreneixs optimizingtheeffectivespotsizeandthedosimetricleafgapoftheacurosxbalgorithmforvmattreatmentplanning