Cargando…

Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Outcomes of Treatments for Intermittent Claudication Tested in Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: No network meta‐analysis has considered the relative efficacy of cilostazol, home exercise therapy, supervised exercise therapy (SET), endovascular revascularization (ER), and ER plus SET (ER+SET) in improving maximum walking distance (MWD) over short‐ (<1 year), moderate‐ (1 to <2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thanigaimani, Shivshankar, Phie, James, Sharma, Chinmay, Wong, Shannon, Ibrahim, Muhammad, Huynh, Pacific, Moxon, Joseph, Jones, Rhondda, Golledge, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33890475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019672
_version_ 1783707667752026112
author Thanigaimani, Shivshankar
Phie, James
Sharma, Chinmay
Wong, Shannon
Ibrahim, Muhammad
Huynh, Pacific
Moxon, Joseph
Jones, Rhondda
Golledge, Jonathan
author_facet Thanigaimani, Shivshankar
Phie, James
Sharma, Chinmay
Wong, Shannon
Ibrahim, Muhammad
Huynh, Pacific
Moxon, Joseph
Jones, Rhondda
Golledge, Jonathan
author_sort Thanigaimani, Shivshankar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No network meta‐analysis has considered the relative efficacy of cilostazol, home exercise therapy, supervised exercise therapy (SET), endovascular revascularization (ER), and ER plus SET (ER+SET) in improving maximum walking distance (MWD) over short‐ (<1 year), moderate‐ (1 to <2 years), and long‐term (≥2 years) follow‐up in people with intermittent claudication. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials testing 1 or more of these 5 treatments according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis guidelines. The primary outcome was improvement in MWD assessed by a standardized treadmill test. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and health‐related quality of life. Network meta‐analysis was performed using the gemtc R statistical package. The Cochrane collaborative tool was used to assess risk of bias. Forty‐six trials involving 4256 patients were included. At short‐term follow‐up, home exercise therapy (mean difference [MD], 89.4 m; 95% credible interval [CrI], 20.9–157.7), SET (MD, 186.8 m; 95% CrI, 136.4–237.6), and ER+SET (MD, 326.3 m; 95% CrI, 222.6–430.6), but not ER (MD, 82.5 m; 95% CrI, −2.4 to 168.2) and cilostazol (MD, 71.1 m; 95% CrI, −24.6 to 167.9), significantly improved MWD (in meters) compared with controls. At moderate‐term follow‐up, SET (MD, 201.1; 95% CrI, 89.8–318.3) and ER+SET (MD, 368.5; 95% CrI, 195.3–546.9), but not home exercise therapy (MD, 99.4; 95% CrI, −174.0 to 374.9) or ER (MD, 84.2; 95% CrI, −35.3 to 206.4), significantly improved MWD (in meters) compared to controls. At long‐term follow‐up, none of the tested treatments significantly improved MWD compared to controls. Adverse events and quality of life were reported inconsistently and could not be meta‐analyzed. Risk of bias was low, moderate, and high in 4, 24, and 18 trials respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This network meta‐analysis suggested that SET and ER+SET are effective at improving MWD over the moderate term (<2 year) but not beyond this. Durable treatments for intermittent claudication are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8200724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82007242021-06-15 Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Outcomes of Treatments for Intermittent Claudication Tested in Randomized Controlled Trials Thanigaimani, Shivshankar Phie, James Sharma, Chinmay Wong, Shannon Ibrahim, Muhammad Huynh, Pacific Moxon, Joseph Jones, Rhondda Golledge, Jonathan J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis BACKGROUND: No network meta‐analysis has considered the relative efficacy of cilostazol, home exercise therapy, supervised exercise therapy (SET), endovascular revascularization (ER), and ER plus SET (ER+SET) in improving maximum walking distance (MWD) over short‐ (<1 year), moderate‐ (1 to <2 years), and long‐term (≥2 years) follow‐up in people with intermittent claudication. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials testing 1 or more of these 5 treatments according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis guidelines. The primary outcome was improvement in MWD assessed by a standardized treadmill test. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and health‐related quality of life. Network meta‐analysis was performed using the gemtc R statistical package. The Cochrane collaborative tool was used to assess risk of bias. Forty‐six trials involving 4256 patients were included. At short‐term follow‐up, home exercise therapy (mean difference [MD], 89.4 m; 95% credible interval [CrI], 20.9–157.7), SET (MD, 186.8 m; 95% CrI, 136.4–237.6), and ER+SET (MD, 326.3 m; 95% CrI, 222.6–430.6), but not ER (MD, 82.5 m; 95% CrI, −2.4 to 168.2) and cilostazol (MD, 71.1 m; 95% CrI, −24.6 to 167.9), significantly improved MWD (in meters) compared with controls. At moderate‐term follow‐up, SET (MD, 201.1; 95% CrI, 89.8–318.3) and ER+SET (MD, 368.5; 95% CrI, 195.3–546.9), but not home exercise therapy (MD, 99.4; 95% CrI, −174.0 to 374.9) or ER (MD, 84.2; 95% CrI, −35.3 to 206.4), significantly improved MWD (in meters) compared to controls. At long‐term follow‐up, none of the tested treatments significantly improved MWD compared to controls. Adverse events and quality of life were reported inconsistently and could not be meta‐analyzed. Risk of bias was low, moderate, and high in 4, 24, and 18 trials respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This network meta‐analysis suggested that SET and ER+SET are effective at improving MWD over the moderate term (<2 year) but not beyond this. Durable treatments for intermittent claudication are needed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8200724/ /pubmed/33890475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019672 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Thanigaimani, Shivshankar
Phie, James
Sharma, Chinmay
Wong, Shannon
Ibrahim, Muhammad
Huynh, Pacific
Moxon, Joseph
Jones, Rhondda
Golledge, Jonathan
Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Outcomes of Treatments for Intermittent Claudication Tested in Randomized Controlled Trials
title Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Outcomes of Treatments for Intermittent Claudication Tested in Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Outcomes of Treatments for Intermittent Claudication Tested in Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Outcomes of Treatments for Intermittent Claudication Tested in Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Outcomes of Treatments for Intermittent Claudication Tested in Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing the Outcomes of Treatments for Intermittent Claudication Tested in Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort network meta‐analysis comparing the outcomes of treatments for intermittent claudication tested in randomized controlled trials
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8200724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33890475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019672
work_keys_str_mv AT thanigaimanishivshankar networkmetaanalysiscomparingtheoutcomesoftreatmentsforintermittentclaudicationtestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT phiejames networkmetaanalysiscomparingtheoutcomesoftreatmentsforintermittentclaudicationtestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT sharmachinmay networkmetaanalysiscomparingtheoutcomesoftreatmentsforintermittentclaudicationtestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wongshannon networkmetaanalysiscomparingtheoutcomesoftreatmentsforintermittentclaudicationtestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ibrahimmuhammad networkmetaanalysiscomparingtheoutcomesoftreatmentsforintermittentclaudicationtestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huynhpacific networkmetaanalysiscomparingtheoutcomesoftreatmentsforintermittentclaudicationtestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT moxonjoseph networkmetaanalysiscomparingtheoutcomesoftreatmentsforintermittentclaudicationtestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jonesrhondda networkmetaanalysiscomparingtheoutcomesoftreatmentsforintermittentclaudicationtestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT golledgejonathan networkmetaanalysiscomparingtheoutcomesoftreatmentsforintermittentclaudicationtestedinrandomizedcontrolledtrials