Cargando…
Safety evaluation of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provides a scientific opinion on the safety of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia (also called AM‐1) as a food additive. AM‐1 is a purified mixture of long‐chain glycolipid congeners obtained by fermentation of the edible non‐ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140988 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6609 |
_version_ | 1783707758551367680 |
---|---|
author | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Barat Baviera, José Manuel Degen, Gisela Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Herman, Lieve Giarola, Alessandra Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia Castle, Laurence |
author_facet | Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Barat Baviera, José Manuel Degen, Gisela Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Herman, Lieve Giarola, Alessandra Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia Castle, Laurence |
collection | PubMed |
description | The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provides a scientific opinion on the safety of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia (also called AM‐1) as a food additive. AM‐1 is a purified mixture of long‐chain glycolipid congeners obtained by fermentation of the edible non‐genetically modified fungus Dacryopinax spathularia. AM‐1 glycolipids have very low oral bioavailability and overall available toxicology data do not demonstrate any adverse effects of the proposed food additive. Considering the available data set the Panel established an ADI of 10 mg/kg bw per day based on a range of NOAELs between 1,000 and 1,423 mg/kg bw per day (the highest doses tested), from the reproductive and a prenatal developmental toxicity studies in rats and 90‐day studies in rat and dog. At the proposed maximum use levels, the exposure estimates ranged at the mean from 0.01 to 1.07 mg/kg bw per day and at the p95 from 0 to 3.1 mg/kg mg/kg bw per day. At the proposed typical use levels, the exposure estimates ranged at the mean from < 0.01 mg/kg bw per day to 0.23 mg/kg bw per day and at the p95 from 0 to 0.64 mg/kg bw per day. The Panel noted that the highest estimate of exposure of 3.1 mg/kg bw per day (in toddlers) is within the established ADI of 10 mg/kg bw per day and concluded that the exposure to long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia does not raise a safety concern at the uses and use levels proposed by the applicant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8201184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-82011842021-06-16 Safety evaluation of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Barat Baviera, José Manuel Degen, Gisela Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Herman, Lieve Giarola, Alessandra Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia Castle, Laurence EFSA J Scientific Opinion The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) provides a scientific opinion on the safety of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia (also called AM‐1) as a food additive. AM‐1 is a purified mixture of long‐chain glycolipid congeners obtained by fermentation of the edible non‐genetically modified fungus Dacryopinax spathularia. AM‐1 glycolipids have very low oral bioavailability and overall available toxicology data do not demonstrate any adverse effects of the proposed food additive. Considering the available data set the Panel established an ADI of 10 mg/kg bw per day based on a range of NOAELs between 1,000 and 1,423 mg/kg bw per day (the highest doses tested), from the reproductive and a prenatal developmental toxicity studies in rats and 90‐day studies in rat and dog. At the proposed maximum use levels, the exposure estimates ranged at the mean from 0.01 to 1.07 mg/kg bw per day and at the p95 from 0 to 3.1 mg/kg mg/kg bw per day. At the proposed typical use levels, the exposure estimates ranged at the mean from < 0.01 mg/kg bw per day to 0.23 mg/kg bw per day and at the p95 from 0 to 0.64 mg/kg bw per day. The Panel noted that the highest estimate of exposure of 3.1 mg/kg bw per day (in toddlers) is within the established ADI of 10 mg/kg bw per day and concluded that the exposure to long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia does not raise a safety concern at the uses and use levels proposed by the applicant. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8201184/ /pubmed/34140988 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6609 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Barat Baviera, José Manuel Degen, Gisela Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Herman, Lieve Giarola, Alessandra Smeraldi, Camilla Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia Castle, Laurence Safety evaluation of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia |
title | Safety evaluation of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia
|
title_full | Safety evaluation of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia
|
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia
|
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia
|
title_short | Safety evaluation of long‐chain glycolipids from Dacryopinax spathularia
|
title_sort | safety evaluation of long‐chain glycolipids from dacryopinax spathularia |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140988 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6609 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT younesmaged safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT aquilinagabriele safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT engelkarlheinz safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT fowlerpaul safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT frutosfernandezmariajose safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT furstpeter safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT gurtlerrainer safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT gundertremyursula safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT husøytrine safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT mancomelania safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT menneswim safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT passamontisabina safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT moldeuspeter safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT shahromina safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT waalkensberendsenine safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT wolfledetlef safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT wrightmatthew safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT baratbavierajosemanuel safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT degengisela safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT leblancjeancharles safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT hermanlieve safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT giarolaalessandra safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT smeraldicamilla safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT tardalexandra safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT vianellogiorgia safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia AT castlelaurence safetyevaluationoflongchainglycolipidsfromdacryopinaxspathularia |