Cargando…

New Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapies for Locally Advanced Periocular Malignant Tumours: Towards a New ‘Eye-Sparing’ Paradigm?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Managing locally advanced periocular malignant tumours, especially those invading the orbit, is challenging. Orbital exenteration has long been considered the gold standard. The development of conservative surgical techniques in the early 2000s, followed by the emergence of new targe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martel, Arnaud, Lassalle, Sandra, Picard-Gauci, Alexandra, Gastaud, Lauris, Montaudie, Henri, Bertolotto, Corine, Nahon-Esteve, Sacha, Poissonnet, Gilles, Hofman, Paul, Baillif, Stephanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34198863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112822
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: Managing locally advanced periocular malignant tumours, especially those invading the orbit, is challenging. Orbital exenteration has long been considered the gold standard. The development of conservative surgical techniques in the early 2000s, followed by the emergence of new targeted therapies and immunotherapies over the past decade, has led to a paradigm shift towards the use of ‘eye-sparing’ strategies. ABSTRACT: The management of periocular skin malignant tumours is challenging. Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for localised eyelid cancers. For more locally advanced cancers, especially those invading the orbit, orbital exenteration has long been considered the gold standard; however, it is a highly disfiguring and traumatic surgery. The last two decades have been marked by the emergence of a new paradigm shift towards the use of ‘eye-sparing’ strategies. In the early 2000s, the first step consisted of performing wide conservative eyelid and orbital excisions. Multiple flaps and grafts were needed, as well as adjuvant radiotherapy in selected cases. Although being incredibly attractive, several limitations such as the inability to treat the more posteriorly located orbital lesions, as well as unbearable diplopia, eye pain and even secondary eye loss were identified. Therefore, surgeons should distinguish ‘eye-sparing’ from ‘sight-sparing’ strategies. The second step emerged over the last decade and was based on the development of targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Their advantages include their potential ability to treat almost all tumours, regardless of their locations, without performing complex surgeries. However, several limitations have been reported, including their side effects, the appearance of primary or secondary resistances, their price and the lack of consensus on treatment regimen and exact duration. The aim of this article was to review the evolution of the management of locally advanced periocular malignant tumours over the last three decades and highlight the new paradigm shift towards the use of ‘eye-sparing’ strategies.