Cargando…

A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation

BACKGROUND: Caesarean sections often have no urgent indication and are electively planned. Research showed that elective caesarean section should not be performed until 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation to ensure best neonatal and maternal health if there are no contraindications. This was recommended b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prediger, Barbara, Heu-Parvaresch, Anahieta, Polus, Stephanie, Bühn, Stefanie, Neugebauer, Edmund A. M., Dawid, Pieper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01718-1
_version_ 1783707849492267008
author Prediger, Barbara
Heu-Parvaresch, Anahieta
Polus, Stephanie
Bühn, Stefanie
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
Dawid, Pieper
author_facet Prediger, Barbara
Heu-Parvaresch, Anahieta
Polus, Stephanie
Bühn, Stefanie
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
Dawid, Pieper
author_sort Prediger, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caesarean sections often have no urgent indication and are electively planned. Research showed that elective caesarean section should not be performed until 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation to ensure best neonatal and maternal health if there are no contraindications. This was recommended by various guidelines published in the last two decades. With this systematic review, we are looking for implementation strategies trying to implement these recommendations to reduce elective caesarean section before 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL on 3rd of March 2021. We included studies that assessed implementation strategies aiming to postpone elective caesarean section to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation. There were no restrictions regarding the type of implementation strategy or reasons for elective caesarean section. Our primary outcome was the rate of elective caesarean sections before 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation. We used the ROBINS-I Tool for the assessment of risk of bias. We did a narrative analysis of the results. RESULTS: We included 10 studies, of which were 2 interrupted time series and 8 before-after studies, covering 205,954 elective caesarean births. All studies included various types of implementation strategies. All implementation strategies showed success in decreasing the rate of elective caesarean sections performed < 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation. Risk difference differed from − 7 (95% CI − 8; − 7) to − 45 (95% CI − 51; − 31). Three studies reported the rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission and showed little reduction. CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows that all presented implementation strategies to reduce elective caesarean section before 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation are effective. Reduction rates differ widely and it remains unclear which strategy is most successful. Strategies used locally in one hospital seem a little more effective. Included studies are either before-after studies (8) or interrupted time series (2) and the overall quality of the evidence is rather low. However, most of the studies identified specific barriers in the implementation process. For planning an implementation strategy to reduce elective caesarean section before 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation, it is necessary to consider specific barriers and facilitators and take all obstetric personal into account. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017078231 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01718-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8201675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82016752021-06-15 A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation Prediger, Barbara Heu-Parvaresch, Anahieta Polus, Stephanie Bühn, Stefanie Neugebauer, Edmund A. M. Dawid, Pieper Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Caesarean sections often have no urgent indication and are electively planned. Research showed that elective caesarean section should not be performed until 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation to ensure best neonatal and maternal health if there are no contraindications. This was recommended by various guidelines published in the last two decades. With this systematic review, we are looking for implementation strategies trying to implement these recommendations to reduce elective caesarean section before 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL on 3rd of March 2021. We included studies that assessed implementation strategies aiming to postpone elective caesarean section to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation. There were no restrictions regarding the type of implementation strategy or reasons for elective caesarean section. Our primary outcome was the rate of elective caesarean sections before 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation. We used the ROBINS-I Tool for the assessment of risk of bias. We did a narrative analysis of the results. RESULTS: We included 10 studies, of which were 2 interrupted time series and 8 before-after studies, covering 205,954 elective caesarean births. All studies included various types of implementation strategies. All implementation strategies showed success in decreasing the rate of elective caesarean sections performed < 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation. Risk difference differed from − 7 (95% CI − 8; − 7) to − 45 (95% CI − 51; − 31). Three studies reported the rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission and showed little reduction. CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows that all presented implementation strategies to reduce elective caesarean section before 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation are effective. Reduction rates differ widely and it remains unclear which strategy is most successful. Strategies used locally in one hospital seem a little more effective. Included studies are either before-after studies (8) or interrupted time series (2) and the overall quality of the evidence is rather low. However, most of the studies identified specific barriers in the implementation process. For planning an implementation strategy to reduce elective caesarean section before 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation, it is necessary to consider specific barriers and facilitators and take all obstetric personal into account. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017078231 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01718-1. BioMed Central 2021-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8201675/ /pubmed/34127077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01718-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Prediger, Barbara
Heu-Parvaresch, Anahieta
Polus, Stephanie
Bühn, Stefanie
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
Dawid, Pieper
A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation
title A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation
title_full A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation
title_fullStr A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation
title_short A systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation
title_sort systematic review on the effectiveness of implementation strategies to postpone elective caesarean sections to ≥ 39 + (0–6) weeks of gestation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34127077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01718-1
work_keys_str_mv AT predigerbarbara asystematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT heuparvareschanahieta asystematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT polusstephanie asystematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT buhnstefanie asystematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT neugebaueredmundam asystematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT dawidpieper asystematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT predigerbarbara systematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT heuparvareschanahieta systematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT polusstephanie systematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT buhnstefanie systematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT neugebaueredmundam systematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation
AT dawidpieper systematicreviewontheeffectivenessofimplementationstrategiestopostponeelectivecaesareansectionsto3906weeksofgestation