Cargando…

Predicting mortality in adult patients with sepsis in the emergency department by using combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Sepsis can be detected in an early stage in the emergency department (ED) by biomarkers and clinical scoring systems. A combination of multiple biomarkers or biomarker with clinical scoring system might result in a higher predictive value on mortality. The goal of this systematic review...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tong-Minh, Kirby, Welten, Iris, Endeman, Henrik, Hagenaars, Tjebbe, Ramakers, Christian, Gommers, Diederik, van Gorp, Eric, van der Does, Yuri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34120605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00461-z
_version_ 1783707852627509248
author Tong-Minh, Kirby
Welten, Iris
Endeman, Henrik
Hagenaars, Tjebbe
Ramakers, Christian
Gommers, Diederik
van Gorp, Eric
van der Does, Yuri
author_facet Tong-Minh, Kirby
Welten, Iris
Endeman, Henrik
Hagenaars, Tjebbe
Ramakers, Christian
Gommers, Diederik
van Gorp, Eric
van der Does, Yuri
author_sort Tong-Minh, Kirby
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sepsis can be detected in an early stage in the emergency department (ED) by biomarkers and clinical scoring systems. A combination of multiple biomarkers or biomarker with clinical scoring system might result in a higher predictive value on mortality. The goal of this systematic review is to evaluate the available literature on combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems on 1-month mortality in patients with sepsis in the ED. METHODS: We performed a systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar. Articles were included if they evaluated at least one biomarker combined with another biomarker or clinical scoring system and reported the prognostic accuracy on 28 or 30 day mortality by area under the curve (AUC) in patients with sepsis. We did not define biomarker cut-off values in advance. RESULTS: We included 18 articles in which a total of 35 combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems were studied, of which 33 unique combinations. In total, seven different clinical scoring systems and 21 different biomarkers were investigated. The combination of procalcitonin (PCT), lactate, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score-2 (SAPS-2) resulted in the highest AUC on 1-month mortality. CONCLUSION: The studies we found in this systematic review were too heterogeneous to conclude that a certain combination it should be used in the ED to predict 1-month mortality in patients with sepsis. Future studies should focus on clinical scoring systems which require a limited amount of clinical parameters, such as the qSOFA score in combination with a biomarker that is already routinely available in the ED. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00461-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8201689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82016892021-06-15 Predicting mortality in adult patients with sepsis in the emergency department by using combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems: a systematic review Tong-Minh, Kirby Welten, Iris Endeman, Henrik Hagenaars, Tjebbe Ramakers, Christian Gommers, Diederik van Gorp, Eric van der Does, Yuri BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Sepsis can be detected in an early stage in the emergency department (ED) by biomarkers and clinical scoring systems. A combination of multiple biomarkers or biomarker with clinical scoring system might result in a higher predictive value on mortality. The goal of this systematic review is to evaluate the available literature on combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems on 1-month mortality in patients with sepsis in the ED. METHODS: We performed a systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar. Articles were included if they evaluated at least one biomarker combined with another biomarker or clinical scoring system and reported the prognostic accuracy on 28 or 30 day mortality by area under the curve (AUC) in patients with sepsis. We did not define biomarker cut-off values in advance. RESULTS: We included 18 articles in which a total of 35 combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems were studied, of which 33 unique combinations. In total, seven different clinical scoring systems and 21 different biomarkers were investigated. The combination of procalcitonin (PCT), lactate, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score-2 (SAPS-2) resulted in the highest AUC on 1-month mortality. CONCLUSION: The studies we found in this systematic review were too heterogeneous to conclude that a certain combination it should be used in the ED to predict 1-month mortality in patients with sepsis. Future studies should focus on clinical scoring systems which require a limited amount of clinical parameters, such as the qSOFA score in combination with a biomarker that is already routinely available in the ED. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-021-00461-z. BioMed Central 2021-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8201689/ /pubmed/34120605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00461-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tong-Minh, Kirby
Welten, Iris
Endeman, Henrik
Hagenaars, Tjebbe
Ramakers, Christian
Gommers, Diederik
van Gorp, Eric
van der Does, Yuri
Predicting mortality in adult patients with sepsis in the emergency department by using combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems: a systematic review
title Predicting mortality in adult patients with sepsis in the emergency department by using combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems: a systematic review
title_full Predicting mortality in adult patients with sepsis in the emergency department by using combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems: a systematic review
title_fullStr Predicting mortality in adult patients with sepsis in the emergency department by using combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Predicting mortality in adult patients with sepsis in the emergency department by using combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems: a systematic review
title_short Predicting mortality in adult patients with sepsis in the emergency department by using combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems: a systematic review
title_sort predicting mortality in adult patients with sepsis in the emergency department by using combinations of biomarkers and clinical scoring systems: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34120605
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00461-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tongminhkirby predictingmortalityinadultpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentbyusingcombinationsofbiomarkersandclinicalscoringsystemsasystematicreview
AT welteniris predictingmortalityinadultpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentbyusingcombinationsofbiomarkersandclinicalscoringsystemsasystematicreview
AT endemanhenrik predictingmortalityinadultpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentbyusingcombinationsofbiomarkersandclinicalscoringsystemsasystematicreview
AT hagenaarstjebbe predictingmortalityinadultpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentbyusingcombinationsofbiomarkersandclinicalscoringsystemsasystematicreview
AT ramakerschristian predictingmortalityinadultpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentbyusingcombinationsofbiomarkersandclinicalscoringsystemsasystematicreview
AT gommersdiederik predictingmortalityinadultpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentbyusingcombinationsofbiomarkersandclinicalscoringsystemsasystematicreview
AT vangorperic predictingmortalityinadultpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentbyusingcombinationsofbiomarkersandclinicalscoringsystemsasystematicreview
AT vanderdoesyuri predictingmortalityinadultpatientswithsepsisintheemergencydepartmentbyusingcombinationsofbiomarkersandclinicalscoringsystemsasystematicreview