Cargando…

Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude

BACKGROUND: In-flight conditions are hypothesized to influence the timing and success of long-distance migration. Wind assistance and thermal uplift are thought to reduce the energetic costs of flight, humidity, air pressure and temperature may affect the migrants’ water balance, and clouds may impe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galtbalt, Batbayar, Lilleyman, Amanda, Coleman, Jonathan T., Cheng, Chuyu, Ma, Zhijun, Rogers, Danny I., Woodworth, Bradley K., Fuller, Richard A., Garnett, Stephen T., Klaassen, Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34120657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-021-00267-5
_version_ 1783707853608976384
author Galtbalt, Batbayar
Lilleyman, Amanda
Coleman, Jonathan T.
Cheng, Chuyu
Ma, Zhijun
Rogers, Danny I.
Woodworth, Bradley K.
Fuller, Richard A.
Garnett, Stephen T.
Klaassen, Marcel
author_facet Galtbalt, Batbayar
Lilleyman, Amanda
Coleman, Jonathan T.
Cheng, Chuyu
Ma, Zhijun
Rogers, Danny I.
Woodworth, Bradley K.
Fuller, Richard A.
Garnett, Stephen T.
Klaassen, Marcel
author_sort Galtbalt, Batbayar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In-flight conditions are hypothesized to influence the timing and success of long-distance migration. Wind assistance and thermal uplift are thought to reduce the energetic costs of flight, humidity, air pressure and temperature may affect the migrants’ water balance, and clouds may impede navigation. Recent advances in animal-borne long-distance tracking enable evaluating the importance of these factors in determining animals’ flight altitude. METHODS: Here we determine the effects of wind, humidity, temperature, cloud cover, and altitude (as proxy for climbing costs and air pressure) on flight altitude selection of two long-distance migratory shorebirds, far eastern curlew (Numenius madagascariensis) and whimbrel (Numenius phaeopus). To reveal the predominant drivers of flight altitude selection during migration we compared the atmospheric conditions at the altitude the birds were found flying with conditions elsewhere in the air column using conditional logistic mixed effect models. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that despite occasional high-altitude migrations (up to 5550 m above ground level), our study species typically forego flying at high altitudes, limiting climbing costs and potentially alleviating water loss and facilitating navigation. While mainly preferring migrating at low altitude, notably in combination with low air temperature, the birds also preferred flying with wind support to likely reduce flight costs. They avoided clouds, perhaps to help navigation or to reduce the risks from adverse weather. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the primary determinant of avian migrant’s flight altitude selection is a preference for low altitude, with wind support as an important secondary factor. Our approach and findings can assist in predicting climate change effects on migration and in mitigating bird strikes with air traffic, wind farms, power lines, and other human-made structures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40462-021-00267-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8201695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82016952021-06-15 Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude Galtbalt, Batbayar Lilleyman, Amanda Coleman, Jonathan T. Cheng, Chuyu Ma, Zhijun Rogers, Danny I. Woodworth, Bradley K. Fuller, Richard A. Garnett, Stephen T. Klaassen, Marcel Mov Ecol Research BACKGROUND: In-flight conditions are hypothesized to influence the timing and success of long-distance migration. Wind assistance and thermal uplift are thought to reduce the energetic costs of flight, humidity, air pressure and temperature may affect the migrants’ water balance, and clouds may impede navigation. Recent advances in animal-borne long-distance tracking enable evaluating the importance of these factors in determining animals’ flight altitude. METHODS: Here we determine the effects of wind, humidity, temperature, cloud cover, and altitude (as proxy for climbing costs and air pressure) on flight altitude selection of two long-distance migratory shorebirds, far eastern curlew (Numenius madagascariensis) and whimbrel (Numenius phaeopus). To reveal the predominant drivers of flight altitude selection during migration we compared the atmospheric conditions at the altitude the birds were found flying with conditions elsewhere in the air column using conditional logistic mixed effect models. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that despite occasional high-altitude migrations (up to 5550 m above ground level), our study species typically forego flying at high altitudes, limiting climbing costs and potentially alleviating water loss and facilitating navigation. While mainly preferring migrating at low altitude, notably in combination with low air temperature, the birds also preferred flying with wind support to likely reduce flight costs. They avoided clouds, perhaps to help navigation or to reduce the risks from adverse weather. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the primary determinant of avian migrant’s flight altitude selection is a preference for low altitude, with wind support as an important secondary factor. Our approach and findings can assist in predicting climate change effects on migration and in mitigating bird strikes with air traffic, wind farms, power lines, and other human-made structures. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40462-021-00267-5. BioMed Central 2021-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8201695/ /pubmed/34120657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-021-00267-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Galtbalt, Batbayar
Lilleyman, Amanda
Coleman, Jonathan T.
Cheng, Chuyu
Ma, Zhijun
Rogers, Danny I.
Woodworth, Bradley K.
Fuller, Richard A.
Garnett, Stephen T.
Klaassen, Marcel
Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude
title Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude
title_full Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude
title_fullStr Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude
title_full_unstemmed Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude
title_short Far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude
title_sort far eastern curlew and whimbrel prefer flying low - wind support and good visibility appear only secondary factors in determining migratory flight altitude
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34120657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40462-021-00267-5
work_keys_str_mv AT galtbaltbatbayar fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude
AT lilleymanamanda fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude
AT colemanjonathant fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude
AT chengchuyu fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude
AT mazhijun fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude
AT rogersdannyi fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude
AT woodworthbradleyk fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude
AT fullerricharda fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude
AT garnettstephent fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude
AT klaassenmarcel fareasterncurlewandwhimbrelpreferflyinglowwindsupportandgoodvisibilityappearonlysecondaryfactorsindeterminingmigratoryflightaltitude