Cargando…

Evaluation of Consistency of Treatment Response Across Regions—the LEADER Trial in Relation to the ICH E17 Guideline

The US Food and Drug Administration in 2008 required new type 2 diabetes (T2D) medications to be subject to cardiovascular outcomes safety requirements. Accordingly, the global LEADER trial investigated cardiovascular outcomes of T2D treatment with liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor ago...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Henrik K., DeChiaro, Stephanie, Goldman, Bryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136501
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.662775
_version_ 1783707895707205632
author Nielsen, Henrik K.
DeChiaro, Stephanie
Goldman, Bryan
author_facet Nielsen, Henrik K.
DeChiaro, Stephanie
Goldman, Bryan
author_sort Nielsen, Henrik K.
collection PubMed
description The US Food and Drug Administration in 2008 required new type 2 diabetes (T2D) medications to be subject to cardiovascular outcomes safety requirements. Accordingly, the global LEADER trial investigated cardiovascular outcomes of T2D treatment with liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. LEADER (NCT01179048) was a multiregional clinical trial (MRCT) conducted from 2010 to 2016, thus completed before publication of the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) E17 guideline on MRCTs in 2017. Novo Nordisk pre-specified analysis of regional cardiovascular outcomes of LEADER participants. This paper assesses the pre-specified regional outcomes based on the ICH E17 guidelines on consistency evaluation. Regional LEADER participant numbers were broadly aligned with ICH E17 guidance and equally balanced across Europe, Asia, North America, and rest of the world. Overall primary major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) composite outcome for the trial: hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) 0.87 (0.78; 0.97); regional results varied, ranging from HR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.37; 1.04) (Asia) to 1.01 (0.84; 1.22) (North America). However, pre-specified Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses did not show clear evidence of interaction between regions and primary outcome (p = 0.20). Furthermore, post hoc analysis of the US population in the North American region found that adjusting for extrinsic or intrinsic factors did not account for this difference [HR (95% CI) 1.03 (0.84; 1.25)]. LEADER data evaluation demonstrated general consistency in cardiovascular safety across regions, except for US participants. Discrepancies in the North American region may relate to drug exposure or chance, but, as these were post hoc findings, the overall primary result is valid, aligned with ICH E17 guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8201994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-82019942021-06-15 Evaluation of Consistency of Treatment Response Across Regions—the LEADER Trial in Relation to the ICH E17 Guideline Nielsen, Henrik K. DeChiaro, Stephanie Goldman, Bryan Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine The US Food and Drug Administration in 2008 required new type 2 diabetes (T2D) medications to be subject to cardiovascular outcomes safety requirements. Accordingly, the global LEADER trial investigated cardiovascular outcomes of T2D treatment with liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist. LEADER (NCT01179048) was a multiregional clinical trial (MRCT) conducted from 2010 to 2016, thus completed before publication of the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) E17 guideline on MRCTs in 2017. Novo Nordisk pre-specified analysis of regional cardiovascular outcomes of LEADER participants. This paper assesses the pre-specified regional outcomes based on the ICH E17 guidelines on consistency evaluation. Regional LEADER participant numbers were broadly aligned with ICH E17 guidance and equally balanced across Europe, Asia, North America, and rest of the world. Overall primary major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) composite outcome for the trial: hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) 0.87 (0.78; 0.97); regional results varied, ranging from HR (95% CI) 0.62 (0.37; 1.04) (Asia) to 1.01 (0.84; 1.22) (North America). However, pre-specified Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses did not show clear evidence of interaction between regions and primary outcome (p = 0.20). Furthermore, post hoc analysis of the US population in the North American region found that adjusting for extrinsic or intrinsic factors did not account for this difference [HR (95% CI) 1.03 (0.84; 1.25)]. LEADER data evaluation demonstrated general consistency in cardiovascular safety across regions, except for US participants. Discrepancies in the North American region may relate to drug exposure or chance, but, as these were post hoc findings, the overall primary result is valid, aligned with ICH E17 guidelines. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8201994/ /pubmed/34136501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.662775 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nielsen, DeChiaro and Goldman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Nielsen, Henrik K.
DeChiaro, Stephanie
Goldman, Bryan
Evaluation of Consistency of Treatment Response Across Regions—the LEADER Trial in Relation to the ICH E17 Guideline
title Evaluation of Consistency of Treatment Response Across Regions—the LEADER Trial in Relation to the ICH E17 Guideline
title_full Evaluation of Consistency of Treatment Response Across Regions—the LEADER Trial in Relation to the ICH E17 Guideline
title_fullStr Evaluation of Consistency of Treatment Response Across Regions—the LEADER Trial in Relation to the ICH E17 Guideline
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Consistency of Treatment Response Across Regions—the LEADER Trial in Relation to the ICH E17 Guideline
title_short Evaluation of Consistency of Treatment Response Across Regions—the LEADER Trial in Relation to the ICH E17 Guideline
title_sort evaluation of consistency of treatment response across regions—the leader trial in relation to the ich e17 guideline
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8201994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34136501
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.662775
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenhenrikk evaluationofconsistencyoftreatmentresponseacrossregionstheleadertrialinrelationtotheiche17guideline
AT dechiarostephanie evaluationofconsistencyoftreatmentresponseacrossregionstheleadertrialinrelationtotheiche17guideline
AT goldmanbryan evaluationofconsistencyoftreatmentresponseacrossregionstheleadertrialinrelationtotheiche17guideline